Zhong Justin C, Lerrer Shalom, Mor Adam
Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
John Hopkins University, Department of Biology, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bio Protoc. 2024 Sep 5;14(17):e5057. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5057.
PD-1 is an immune checkpoint on T cells. Antibodies to PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 are gaining popularity as a leading immunotherapy approach. In the US, 40% of all cancer patients will be treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies but, unfortunately, only 30% will respond, and many will develop immune-related adverse events. There are nine FDA-approved anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, and approximately 100 are in different stages of clinical development. It is a clinical challenge to choose the correct antibody for a given patient, and this is critical in advanced malignancies, which often do not permit a second-line intervention. To resolve that, an in vitro assay to compare the performance of the different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies is not only a critical tool for research purposes but also a possible tool for personalized medicine. There are some assays describing the binding affinity and function of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. However, a significant limitation of existing assays is that they need to consider the location of PD-1 in the immune synapse, the interface between the T cell and tumor cells, and, therefore, ignore a critical component in its biology. To address this, we developed and validated an imaging-based assay to quantify and compare the ability of different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies to remove PD-1 from the immune synapse. We correlated that with the same antibodies' ability to increase cytokine secretion from the targeted cells. The strong correlation between PD-1 location and its function in vitro and in vivo within the antibody treatment setting validates this assay's usability, which is easily recordable and straightforward. Key features • Live-cell imaging quantifies and compares how anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies disrupt PD-1 localization, causing the removal of PD-1 during immune synapse formation. • Hao et al. [1] validated the protocol, and the findings were extended to a live confocal microscopy method. • It requires a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope and appropriate imaging software and is optimized for the latest version of Zen Blue. • Anti-PD-1 antibodies are commonly used in cancer therapies, and this protocol optimizes the analysis of their effectiveness.
程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)是T细胞上的一种免疫检查点。针对PD-1或其配体程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)的抗体作为一种主要的免疫治疗方法正越来越受欢迎。在美国,所有癌症患者中有40%将接受抗PD-1或抗PD-L1抗体治疗,但不幸的是,只有30%的患者会有反应,而且许多患者会出现免疫相关不良事件。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了9种抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体,约100种正处于不同的临床开发阶段。为特定患者选择正确的抗体是一项临床挑战,这在晚期恶性肿瘤中至关重要,因为晚期恶性肿瘤通常不允许进行二线干预。为了解决这一问题,一种用于比较不同抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体性能的体外检测方法不仅是研究的关键工具,也是个性化医疗的一种可能工具。有一些检测方法描述了抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体的结合亲和力和功能。然而,现有检测方法的一个重大局限性在于,它们需要考虑PD-1在免疫突触(T细胞与肿瘤细胞之间的界面)中的位置,因此忽略了其生物学中的一个关键组成部分。为了解决这个问题,我们开发并验证了一种基于成像的检测方法,用于量化和比较不同抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体从免疫突触中清除PD-1的能力。我们将其与相同抗体增加靶细胞细胞因子分泌的能力相关联。在抗体治疗环境下,PD-1的定位与其在体内外功能之间的强相关性验证了该检测方法的可用性,该方法易于记录且操作简单。关键特性 • 活细胞成像可量化和比较抗PD-1和抗PD-L1抗体如何破坏PD-1的定位,导致其在免疫突触形成过程中被清除。 • 郝等人[1]验证了该方案,并将研究结果扩展到了活细胞共聚焦显微镜方法。 • 它需要一台蔡司LSM 900共聚焦显微镜和合适的成像软件,并针对最新版本的Zen Blue进行了优化。 • 抗PD-1抗体常用于癌症治疗,该方案优化了对其有效性的分析。