Neris Rubén, Kimyaghalam Ali, Singh Kuldeep
Vascular Surgery, Trumbull Regional Medical Center, Warren, USA.
Vascular Surgery, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):e69327. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69327. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Background Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is readily available and often used as the first diagnostic test for patients with peripheral artery diseases (PADs). PAD is a disease that affects the general population but more commonly affects diabetics. To date, the role of DUS in the assessment of tibial vessel disease is inconclusive at best. The goal of our study is to assess the validity of DUS in characterizing the presence and severity of tibial diseases via comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study analyzing three arterial segments (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and fibular arteries) in patients who received a duplex study followed by DSA within a 30-day period. All arterial segments were graded from normal (Grade 0) to occluded (Grade 4), based on duplex interpretation and directly compared to direct visualization findings from DSA. Using statistical methods, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DUS were determined. Results A total of 171 tibial vessel segments from 57 enrolled subjects with critical limb ischemia symptoms were analyzed in this study. The agreement between both modalities was poor (Kappa=0.19, p < 0.05), with DUS demonstrating a significant underestimation of vessel pathologies. This is also reflected by the overall sub-optimal sensitivity (23%), specificity (84%), PPV (69%), and NPV (41%) in DUS when compared to DSA results as the gold standard. Conclusion Significant disagreements were noted in this study between DUS and DSA findings, primarily significant underestimation of tibial vessel disease by the DUS when compared with the DSA. Caution is advised in the clinical application of DUS in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) symptoms and multi-segment tibial vessels due to its demonstrated limitations in this study.
背景 双功超声检查(DUS)易于获得,常被用作外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的首选诊断检查。PAD是一种影响普通人群但更常见于糖尿病患者的疾病。迄今为止,DUS在评估胫血管疾病方面的作用充其量是不确定的。我们研究的目的是通过与数字减影血管造影(DSA)结果比较,评估DUS在表征胫血管疾病的存在和严重程度方面的有效性。方法 这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,分析了在30天内接受双功检查后又进行DSA检查的患者的三个动脉节段(胫前动脉、胫后动脉和腓动脉)。根据双功超声解读,所有动脉节段从正常(0级)到闭塞(4级)进行分级,并直接与DSA直接可视化结果进行比较。使用统计方法确定DUS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。结果 本研究共分析了57名有严重肢体缺血症状的入选受试者的171个胫血管节段。两种检查方法之间的一致性较差(Kappa=0.19,p<0.05),DUS对血管病变有明显低估。与作为金标准的DSA结果相比,DUS的总体敏感性(23%)、特异性(84%)、PPV(69%)和NPV(41%)欠佳也反映了这一点。结论 本研究发现DUS和DSA结果之间存在显著差异,主要是与DSA相比,DUS对胫血管疾病有明显低估。鉴于本研究中显示的局限性,对于有慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)症状和多节段胫血管的患者,在临床应用DUS时建议谨慎。