Zhang Wupeng, Xu Cheng, Jia Zhengfeng, Wang Daofeng, Gao Weilu, Li Jiantao, Zhang Licheng, Tang Peifu
School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024 Sep 16:1-10. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2024.2399036.
Posteromedial tibial plateau fracture is one of the most challenging traumatic fractures. We aimed to compare and explain the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of the posteromedial split fracture fragment in tibial plateau fractures. Finite element models of the tibial plateau fracture were constructed. Three different internal fixations were developed to treat the posteromedial split fracture fragment in tibial plateau fractures finite element models: (a) the novel anatomic locking plate fixation model, (b) the common anatomic locking plate fixation model, and (c) the reconstruction plate fixation model. We applied the same loading conditions to each model: 320 N axial compression. Under the same condition, the von Mises stress (VMS) and displacement distribution of the three internal fixations and tibia plateau were studied. The stress values of the novel anatomic locking plate are lower than the common anatomic locking plate and the reconstruction plate. Additionally, the novel anatomic locking plate fixation system exhibits smaller maximum displacement. In conclusion, our study indicated that the novel anatomic locking plate resulted in a lower stress distribution in the plate and screws, and better stability than the common anatomic locking plate and the reconstruction plate for the posteromedial split fracture fragment in tibial plateau fractures fixation under the same loading conditions. Thus, for the posteromedial split fracture fragment in tibial plateau fractures, the use of the novel anatomic locking plate internal fixation is recommended.
胫骨平台后内侧骨折是最具挑战性的创伤性骨折之一。我们旨在比较和解释不同内固定方法治疗胫骨平台骨折后内侧劈裂骨折块的生物力学优缺点。构建了胫骨平台骨折的有限元模型。针对胫骨平台骨折有限元模型中的后内侧劈裂骨折块,开发了三种不同的内固定方法:(a)新型解剖锁定钢板固定模型,(b)普通解剖锁定钢板固定模型,以及(c)重建钢板固定模型。我们对每个模型施加相同的加载条件:320 N轴向压缩。在相同条件下,研究了三种内固定和胫骨平台的von Mises应力(VMS)和位移分布。新型解剖锁定钢板的应力值低于普通解剖锁定钢板和重建钢板。此外,新型解剖锁定钢板固定系统的最大位移较小。总之,我们的研究表明,在相同加载条件下,对于胫骨平台骨折后内侧劈裂骨折块的固定,新型解剖锁定钢板在钢板和螺钉中的应力分布更低,稳定性优于普通解剖锁定钢板和重建钢板。因此,对于胫骨平台骨折的后内侧劈裂骨折块,建议使用新型解剖锁定钢板内固定。