Suppr超能文献

医学教育者元认知实践的探索。

An exploration of metacognitive practices in medical educators.

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology, & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2024 Oct;17(7):1485-1494. doi: 10.1002/ase.2503. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

Abstract

Metacognition is the ability to monitor and evaluate one's thoughts about learning and has been shown in some studies to improve the effectiveness of instructors. With dissection-based gross anatomy, instructors dynamically use their metacognition to monitor student learning and adapt their teaching at tableside. This study explored the metacognition of instructors as they taught in an anatomy course for allied health students. All instructors in a doctoral-level gross anatomy course at a single institution, including faculty, associate instructors (AIs), and teaching assistants (TAs), were invited to participate. At the start and end of the course, participating instructors completed pre- and post-questionnaires, which included the Teacher Metacognition Inventory (TMI), a 28-item survey that assesses metacognition as it relates to teaching. After labs, instructors completed reflective journals to provide deeper insight into their metacognition. Reflective journals were then thematically analyzed. Thirteen (52%) instructors participated in this study, including five faculty, three AI, and five TAs. Between the start and end of the course, total TMI score increased from 108.8 to 114.3 (p = 0.046). TAs exhibited the greatest change in total TMI score (Δ = +11.4) followed by faculty (Δ = +3.2) and AIs (Δ = -0.7). Several themes were also identified. For example, TAs were more internally focused on content mastery, whereas faculty were externally focused on interpersonal factors (e.g., inclusive language). These insights into the metacognition of anatomy instructors, though limited in reliability and generalizability, may inform how to best support their professional development. Novices may benefit from content reviews, while experienced instructors may benefit from inclusivity or communications training.

摘要

元认知是监控和评估自身学习思维的能力,一些研究表明,元认知可以提高教师的教学效果。在基于解剖的大体解剖学中,教师在桌旁教学时会动态运用元认知来监控学生的学习情况,并调整教学方法。本研究探讨了教师在为辅助健康学生教授解剖学课程时的元认知。邀请了一家机构的博士级大体解剖学课程中的所有教师(包括教员、副教授和助教)参与。在课程开始和结束时,参与的教师完成了预测试卷和后测试卷,其中包括教师元认知量表(TMI),这是一项 28 项的调查,评估与教学相关的元认知。在实验课后,教师完成了反思性日志,以更深入地了解他们的元认知。然后对反思性日志进行主题分析。共有 13 位(52%)教师参与了这项研究,包括 5 位教员、3 位副教授和 5 位助教。在课程开始和结束之间,TMI 总分从 108.8 分增加到 114.3 分(p=0.046)。助教的 TMI 总分变化最大(Δ=+11.4),其次是教员(Δ=+3.2)和副教授(Δ=-0.7)。还确定了几个主题。例如,助教更关注内容掌握的内在因素,而教员则更关注人际因素(例如,包容性语言)。这些对解剖学教师元认知的见解虽然在可靠性和普遍性方面存在限制,但可能会为如何最好地支持他们的专业发展提供信息。新手可能受益于内容复习,而有经验的教师可能受益于包容性或沟通培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验