How Accurate Is Frameless Fiducial-Free Deep Brain Stimulation?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Frameless deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers advantages in terms of patient comfort and reduced operative time. However, the need for bony fiducial markers for localization remains a drawback due to the time-consuming and uncomfortable procedure. An alternative localization method involves the direct tracking of an intraoperative 3-dimensional scanner. This study aims to assess the accuracy of the NexFrame frameless DBS system in conjunction with the O-Arm (Medtronic Inc.), both with and without fiducial markers.

METHODS

The locations of 100 DBS leads were determined, with 50 cases using fiducial-free localization and 50 involving fiducial markers. The coordinates were compared with the expected intraoperative targets. Absolute errors in the X, Y, and Z coordinates (ΔX, ΔY, and ΔZ) were calculated, along with the vector error (Euclidean) (vector error ).

RESULTS

The vector error averaged 1.61 ± 0.49 mm (right) and 1.52 ± 0.60 mm (left) for the group without fiducial bone markers and 1.66 ± 0.69 (right) and 1.44 ± 0.65 mm (left) for the other cohort (P = .76 right; P = .67 left). Absolute errors in the X, Y, and Z coordinates for the fiducial-free group were 0.88 ± 0.55, 0.79 ± 0.45, and 0.79 ± 0.57 mm (right) and 0.72 ± 0.37, 0.78 ± 0.56, and 0.77 ± 0.71 mm (left). For the group with fiducial markers, these errors were 0.87 ± 0.72, 0.92 ± 0.39, and 0.86 ± 0.50 mm (right) and 0.75 ± 0.33, 0.80 ± 0.51, and 0.73 ± 0.64 mm (left) with no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of the accuracy of NexFrame DBS, both with and without fiducial markers, using an intraoperative navigable cone-beam computed tomography, demonstrates that both techniques provide sufficient and equivalent 3-dimensional accuracy.