Occupational Stress and Health Management Research Group, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Kawasaki, Japan.
Research Center for Overwork-Related Disorders, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Kawasaki, Japan.
J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae054.
This study aimed to prospectively investigate the association between work environment improvements and multiple mental health outcomes in a large sample of Japanese employees.
A web-based longitudinal study surveyed 20 000 Japanese employees, 7970 of whom completed a follow-up after 1 year. Various types of work environment improvements experienced by workers were assessed using a 24-item checklist. Three mental health outcomes (poor mental health, presenteeism, and high psychosocial stress) were assessed and defined using standardized questionnaires.
Overall, as the total number of work environment improvements increased, the odds ratio for mental health outcomes in the follow-up survey decreased by several percentage points, even after adjusting for demographic and occupational factors. Analysis of the types of work environment improvements showed that mutual support improvements were particularly effective in reducing mental health issues. The subgroup analyses also showed that the effectiveness of workplace environment improvements might vary between secondary and tertiary industry workers depending on the types of improvements and mental health outcomes.
The study suggests that workplace improvements can significantly affect mental health. The effectiveness of these improvements may vary according to the type of intervention, industry of the targeted workers, and mental health outcomes. This study provides basic data on the effectiveness of workplace environment improvements that can be used for future intervention trials.
本研究旨在前瞻性调查日本大型员工样本中工作环境改善与多种心理健康结果之间的关联。
一项基于网络的纵向研究调查了 20000 名日本员工,其中 7970 名员工在 1 年后完成了随访。使用 24 项清单评估工人经历的各种类型的工作环境改善。使用标准化问卷评估三种心理健康结果(心理健康状况不佳、出勤和高心理社会压力)。
总体而言,随着工作环境改善数量的增加,即使在调整了人口统计学和职业因素后,随访调查中心理健康结果的优势比也会降低几个百分点。对工作环境改善类型的分析表明,相互支持的改善对减少心理健康问题特别有效。亚组分析还表明,工作场所环境改善的效果可能因改善的类型和心理健康结果而异,取决于第二产业和第三产业工人。
本研究表明,工作场所改善可以显著影响心理健康。这些改善的效果可能因干预类型、目标工人所在行业以及心理健康结果而异。本研究提供了可用于未来干预试验的工作场所环境改善效果的基本数据。