College of Social Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Centre for Global Health Research, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Sep 16;18(9):e0012507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012507. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Assessing how interventions are implemented is essential to understanding why interventions may or may not achieve their intended outcomes. There is little evidence about how interventions against Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) are being implemented. Guided by the Context and Implementation of Complex Intervention (CICI) framework, we evaluated an ongoing intervention against the NTD podoconiosis to examine the implementation process and its effectiveness in terms of improving shoe wearing practices, increasing knowledge and reducing stigmatizing attitudes towards podoconiosis in rural Ethiopia.
We employed an exploratory mixed methods approach, qualitative followed by quantitative, between April and July 2022 to assess implementation agents, theory, strategy, process and outcomes of the intervention. We conducted document analysis, observations, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and key informant interviews for the qualitative phase. We administered a survey to 369 rural residents, of whom 42 were affected by podoconiosis.
The implementers utilized government healthcare centers in a bid to mainstream podoconiosis services within local healthcare structures. The implementers provided training for health professionals and the public and distributed supplies to patients over a three-month period. The intervention reached 62% of patients, but female patients were less likely to participate than male patients. Only 18% of community members had participated in health education campaigns linked to the intervention. Involvement in the intervention resulted in improved shoe wearing practice and holding fewer stigmatizing attitudes. However, internalized stigma among patients was still rife; and the plan to utilize community assets to extend the intervention activities was not effective.
Implementers must monitor the fidelity and progression of programs on a constant basis to make corrections. They also need to expand health education, provide psychosocial support and design economic empowerment programs for patients to reduce stigma. They must also collaborate with policy makers and international partners to sustain program activities at intervention delivery points.
评估干预措施的实施情况对于理解干预措施为何可能实现或无法实现预期结果至关重要。关于针对被忽视热带病(NTDs)的干预措施的实施情况,证据甚少。本研究以复杂干预措施的背景和实施(CICI)框架为指导,评估了正在进行的针对 NTD 象皮病的干预措施,以检查实施过程及其在改善穿鞋习惯、增加知识和减少对埃塞俄比亚农村象皮病的污名化态度方面的有效性。
我们采用探索性混合方法,先进行定性研究,再进行定量研究,于 2022 年 4 月至 7 月间评估干预措施的实施者、理论、策略、过程和结果。我们进行了文件分析、观察、焦点小组讨论、深入访谈和关键知情人访谈,以进行定性研究。我们对 369 名农村居民进行了调查,其中 42 人患有象皮病。
实施者利用政府医疗中心,将象皮病服务纳入当地医疗结构的主流。实施者为卫生专业人员和公众提供了培训,并在三个月的时间内向患者发放了用品。该干预措施覆盖了 62%的患者,但女性患者参与度低于男性患者。只有 18%的社区成员参加了与干预措施相关的健康教育活动。参与干预措施后,患者的穿鞋习惯有所改善,对疾病的污名化态度有所减少。然而,患者内化的污名化态度仍然普遍存在;利用社区资产扩大干预活动的计划并未奏效。
实施者必须定期监测项目的一致性和进展情况,以便及时进行调整。他们还需要扩大健康教育,为患者提供心理社会支持和经济赋权计划,以减少污名化。他们还必须与决策者和国际合作伙伴合作,以维持干预措施在实施点的活动。