Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
JBJS Rev. 2024 Sep 16;12(9). doi: e24.00115. eCollection 2024 Sep 1.
Incisional dressings may decrease wound complications and joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA; TKA). However, there is no consensus on the superiority of a particular product. This study compared infection and wound complications among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across various dressing types after primary THA and TKA.
Scopus, Ovid/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried in May 2024. A frequentist model network meta-analysis of eligible prospective RCTs compared minor and major wound complications and dressing changes using P-scores.
Of 3,067 compiled studies, 12 RCTs of 1,939 patients with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 42 (382) days undergoing primary THA (n = 880, 45.4%) or TKA (n = 1,059, 54.6%) with alginate (n = 208; 10.7%), absorbent (n = 236; 12.2%), gauze (n = 474; 24.4%), or hydrofiber (n = 683; 35.2%) dressings or negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT; n = 338; 17.4%) were included for meta-analysis. Compared with gauze, alginate and hydrofiber dressings were associated with fewer postoperative changes (mean difference [MD], -12.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.08 to -9.09, p < 0.001; MD, -3.5; 95% CI, -6.30 to -0.74, p = 0.013, respectively). In a subanalysis, silver-ion hydrofiber also was associated with fewer changes (MD, -5.0; 95% CI, -5.70 to -4.39; p < 0.001). Overall, there was no statistically significant risk of increased minor nor major wound complications including superficial and deep infections among all dressing types and NPWT compared with gauze.
Despite no association between wound complications nor infection risk among various incisional dressings and NPWT vs. gauze, the alginate, hydrofiber, and silver hydrofiber dressings had statistically fewer mean postoperative changes. Future studies are required to assess whether these dressings confer reduced infection risk.
Therapeutic, Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
切口敷料可降低全髋关节和膝关节置换术后(THA;TKA)的伤口并发症和关节感染风险。然而,目前尚没有哪种特定产品具有优势的共识。本研究比较了不同类型敷料在初次 THA 和 TKA 后,随机对照试验(RCT)中感染和伤口并发症的情况。
2024 年 5 月,检索 Scopus、Ovid/MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。使用 P 评分对纳入的前瞻性 RCT 进行基于频率的模型网络荟萃分析,比较小切口和大切口并发症以及敷料更换情况。
在 3067 篇编译研究中,纳入了 12 项 RCT 共 1939 例患者,中位数(四分位距)随访时间为 42(382)天,行初次 THA(n=880,45.4%)或 TKA(n=1059,54.6%),采用藻酸盐(n=208,10.7%)、吸收剂(n=236,12.2%)、纱布(n=474,24.4%)或水胶体纤维(n=683,35.2%)敷料或负压伤口治疗(NPWT;n=338,17.4%)。荟萃分析纳入了与术后变化次数有关的研究(比较纱布组):与纱布组相比,藻酸盐和水胶体纤维敷料的术后变化次数更少(差值,-12.1;95%置信区间,-15.08 至-9.09,p<0.001;差值,-3.5;95%置信区间,-6.30 至-0.74,p=0.013)。在亚分析中,含银离子的水胶体纤维敷料的术后变化次数也更少(差值,-5.0;95%置信区间,-5.70 至-4.39;p<0.001)。总体而言,与纱布组相比,所有类型敷料和 NPWT 均未增加轻度或重度伤口并发症(包括浅表和深部感染)的风险。
尽管在各种切口敷料和 NPWT 与纱布之间,伤口并发症或感染风险之间没有关联,但藻酸盐、水胶体纤维和含银水胶体纤维敷料的术后平均变化次数更少。需要进一步研究评估这些敷料是否可以降低感染风险。
治疗性,I 级。请参见《作者须知》,以获取完整的证据水平描述。