Dinov Borislav, Henfling Carsten, Ebbinghaus Hans, Latuscynski Konrad, Paetsch Ingo, Jahnke Cosima, Sossalla Samuel, Laufs Ulrich, Ueberham Laura
1(st) Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Giessen, Germany.
Department of Electrophysiology, Helios Heart Center of Leipzig (HZL), Leipzig, Germany; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jun;22(6):1598-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.020. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
Atrioventricular block (AVB) is a frequent initial presentation of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but dangerous ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can occur. Despite the scarcity of data, guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) rather than a pacemaker implantation whenever a device is needed.
In this study, we aimed to establish predictors for sustained VA in patients with CS presenting with pacing indication because of an AVB.
We prospectively enrolled 112 patients with CS. Excluding those with VA, 82 patients remained and were divided into 2 groups: 34 individuals with AVB as initial presentation and 48 with other symptoms as first presentation (OSF). Both groups were compared for clinical characteristics, rates of VA, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, heart transplantation, and mortality.
During follow-up, VA was detected in 50% in the AVB and 10.4% in the OSF group (P = .001). Death, LVAD implantation, and heart transplantation occurred in 11.8% in AVB group vs 10.4% in the OSF group (P = .847). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was equally observed in both groups: 70% vs 70.5% (P = .966), whereas more patients in the AVB group exhibited abnormal positron emission tomography (PET) uptake: 86.2% vs 54.3% (P = .007). In multivariate analysis, AVB (hazard ratio [HR], 25.15), right ventricular (RV) LGE in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) (HR, 7.39) were predictors for VA occurrence, whereas the use of immunosuppressive therapy was associated with less VA (HR, 0.26).
Patients with CS presenting with AVB have a high risk of sustained VA. Although immunosuppressive drugs may reduce the occurrence of VA, ICD implantation is reasonable, especially in case of RV LGE.
房室传导阻滞(AVB)是心脏结节病(CS)常见的初始表现,但可能会发生危险的室性心律失常(VA)。尽管数据有限,但指南建议,在需要植入设备时,应植入植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)而非起搏器。
在本研究中,我们旨在确定因AVB而有起搏指征的CS患者发生持续性VA的预测因素。
我们前瞻性纳入了112例CS患者。排除有VA的患者后,剩余82例患者被分为2组:34例以AVB为初始表现,48例以其他症状为首发表现(OSF)。比较两组的临床特征、VA发生率、左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入率、心脏移植率和死亡率。
随访期间,AVB组中50%检测到VA,OSF组中10.4%检测到VA(P = .001)。AVB组的死亡、LVAD植入和心脏移植发生率为11.8%,而OSF组为10.4%(P = .847)。两组均同样观察到晚期钆增强(LGE):分别为70%和70.5%(P = .966),而AVB组更多患者表现出正电子发射断层扫描(PET)摄取异常:分别为86.2%和54.3%(P = .007)。多因素分析中,AVB(风险比[HR],25.15)、心血管磁共振(CMR)检查显示右心室(RV)LGE(HR,7.39)是VA发生的预测因素,而使用免疫抑制治疗与较少的VA相关(HR,0.26)。
以AVB为表现的CS患者发生持续性VA的风险很高。尽管免疫抑制药物可能会减少VA的发生,但植入ICD是合理的,尤其是在存在RV LGE的情况下。