Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany.
Psychology with focus on Quantitative Methods, Universität Hamburg, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 1;368:615-632. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.055. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
While the efficacy of digital interventions for the treatment of depression is well established, comprehensive knowledge on how therapeutic changes come about is still limited. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of research on change mechanisms in digital interventions for depression and meta-analytically evaluate indirect effects of potential mediators.
The databases CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating mediators of digital interventions for adults with depression. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and categorized potential mediators. Indirect effects were synthesized with a two-stage structural equation modeling approach (TSSEM).
Overall, 25 trials (8110 participants) investigating 84 potential mediators were identified, of which attentional (8 %), self-related (6 %), biophysiological (6 %), affective (5 %), socio-cultural (2 %) and motivational (1 %) variables were the scope of this study. TSSEM revealed significant mediation effects for combined self-related variables (ab = -0.098; 95 %-CI: [-0.150, -0.051]), combined biophysiological variables (ab = -0.073; 95 %-CI: [-0.119, -0.025]) and mindfulness (ab = -0.042; 95 %-CI: [-0.080, -0.015]). Meta-analytical evaluations of the other three domains were not feasible.
Methodological shortcomings of the included studies, the considerable heterogeneity and the small number of investigated variables within domains limit the generalizability of the results.
The findings further the understanding of potential change mechanisms in digital interventions for depression and highlight recommendations for future process research, such as the consideration of temporal precedence and experimental manipulation of potential mediators, as well as the application of network approaches.
虽然数字干预措施治疗抑郁症的疗效已得到充分证实,但对于治疗变化的发生机制仍知之甚少。本系统评价旨在概述数字干预措施治疗抑郁症的研究变化机制,并对潜在中介因素进行元分析评估间接效应。
系统检索 CENTRAL、Embase、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 数据库,以调查针对患有抑郁症的成年人的数字干预措施的中介因素的随机对照试验。两名评审员独立筛选研究纳入情况,评估研究质量并对潜在中介因素进行分类。使用两阶段结构方程建模方法(TSSEM)综合间接效应。
总体而言,共确定了 25 项研究(8110 名参与者),涉及 84 个潜在的中介因素,其中注意力(8%)、自我相关(6%)、生物生理(6%)、情感(5%)、社会文化(2%)和动机(1%)变量是本研究的范围。TSSEM 显示综合自我相关变量(ab=-0.098;95%-CI:[-0.150,-0.051])、综合生物生理变量(ab=-0.073;95%-CI:[-0.119,-0.025])和正念(ab=-0.042;95%-CI:[-0.080,-0.015])存在显著的中介效应。其他三个领域的元分析评估不可行。
纳入研究的方法学缺陷、相当大的异质性以及各个领域内被调查变量的数量有限,限制了结果的普遍性。
这些发现进一步了解了数字干预措施治疗抑郁症的潜在变化机制,并强调了对未来过程研究的建议,例如考虑潜在中介因素的时间优先顺序和实验操纵,以及应用网络方法。