Lee Joshua, Snell Elizabeth A, Brown Joanne, Booth Charlotte E, Banks Rosamonde E, Turner Daniel J, Vasudev Naveen S, Lagos Dimitris
Hull York Medical School, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Genome Res. 2024 Nov 20;34(11):1849-1864. doi: 10.1101/gr.278801.123.
The use of long-read direct RNA sequencing (DRS) and PCR cDNA sequencing (PCS) in clinical oncology remains limited, with no direct comparison between the two methods. We used DRS and PCS to study clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), focusing on new transcript and gene discovery. Twelve primary ccRCC archival tumors, six from patients who went on to relapse, were analyzed. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 20 patients by qRT-PCR and compared to DRS analysis of RCC4 cells. In archival clinical samples and due to the long-term storage, the average read length was lower (400-500 nt) than that achieved through DRS of RCC4 cells (>1100 nt). Still, deconvolution analysis showed a loss of immune infiltrate in primary tumors of patients who relapse as reported by others. Differentially expressed genes in patients who went on to relapse were determined with good overlap between DRS and PCS, identifying and the T-cell exhaustion marker as novel candidate recurrence-associated genes. Novel transcript analysis revealed over 10,000 candidate novel transcripts detected by both methods and in ccRCC cells in vitro, including a novel () transcript encoding for the soluble version of the protein with a longer 3' UTR and lower stability than the annotated transcript. Both methods identified 414 novel genes, also detected in RCC4 cells, including a novel noncoding gene overexpressed in patients who relapse. Overall, we showcase the use of PCS and DRS in archival tumor samples to uncover unmapped features of cancer transcriptomes, linked to disease progression and immune evasion.
长读长直接RNA测序(DRS)和PCR cDNA测序(PCS)在临床肿瘤学中的应用仍然有限,且这两种方法之间没有直接比较。我们使用DRS和PCS研究透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC),重点是新转录本和基因的发现。分析了12例原发性ccRCC存档肿瘤,其中6例来自后来复发的患者。通过qRT-PCR在20例患者的独立队列中验证了结果,并与RCC4细胞的DRS分析进行了比较。在存档临床样本中,由于长期保存,平均读长(400 - 500 nt)低于通过RCC4细胞DRS获得的读长(>1100 nt)。尽管如此,去卷积分析显示,如其他人所报道,复发患者原发性肿瘤中的免疫浸润有所丧失。通过DRS和PCS确定了复发患者中差异表达的基因,二者有良好的重叠,确定了 和T细胞耗竭标志物 为新的候选复发相关基因。新转录本分析揭示了两种方法以及体外ccRCC细胞中检测到的超过10,000个候选新转录本,包括一种新的 ()转录本,其编码的蛋白质可溶性版本具有比注释转录本更长的3'UTR和更低的稳定性。两种方法都鉴定出414个新基因,在RCC4细胞中也检测到,包括一个在复发患者中过表达的新非编码基因。总体而言,我们展示了PCS和DRS在存档肿瘤样本中的应用,以揭示与疾病进展和免疫逃逸相关的癌症转录组未映射特征。