Suppr超能文献

患者因素和医院因素会影响急性胆囊炎治疗中的手术方式。

Patient and hospital factors influence surgical approach in treatment of acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

Huy Tess C, Shenoy Rivfka, Russell Marcia M, Girgis Mark, Tomlinson James S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave 72-227 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6904, USA.

Veterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7531-7537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11227-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive (MIS) cholecystectomies have become standard due to patient and hospital advantages; however, this approach is not always achievable. Acute and gangrenous cholecystitis increase the likelihood of conversion from MIS to open cholecystectomy. This study aims to examine patient and hospital factors underlying differential utilization of MIS vs open cholecystectomies indicated for acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent a cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 identified from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze patient, geographic, and hospital variables as well as surgical approach.

RESULTS

Our total cohort included 53,503 patients of which 98.4% (n = 52,673) underwent an initial minimally invasive approach and with a conversion rate of 3.3% (n = 1,759). On multivariable analysis advancing age increased the likelihood of either primary open (age 40 to < 65 aOR 2.17; ≥ 65 aOR 3.00) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (age 40 to < 65 aOR 2.20; ≥ 65 aOR 3.15). Similarly, male sex had higher odds of either primary open (aOR 1.70) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (aOR 1.84). Hospital characteristics increasing the likelihood of either primary open or conversion to open cholecystectomy included teaching hospitals (aOR 1.37 and 1.28, respectively) and safety-net hospitals (aOR 1.46 and 1.33, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to cholecystectomy, it is well-established that a minimally invasive surgical approach is associated with superior patient outcomes. Our study focused on the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and identified increasing age as well as male sex as significant factors associated with open surgery. Teaching and safety-net hospital status were also associated with differential utilization of open, conversion-to-open, and MIS. These findings suggest the potential to create and apply strategies to further minimize open surgery in the setting of acute cholecystitis.

摘要

背景

由于对患者和医院均有益处,微创胆囊切除术已成为标准术式;然而,这种方法并非总能实现。急性坏疽性胆囊炎会增加从微创胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的可能性。本研究旨在探讨因急性胆囊炎而行微创与开腹胆囊切除术使用差异背后的患者和医院因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象为2016年至2018年间从加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室数据库中识别出的接受胆囊切除术的急性胆囊炎患者。采用单因素分析和多变量逻辑回归模型分析患者、地理和医院变量以及手术方式。

结果

我们的总队列包括53503例患者,其中98.4%(n = 52673)采用了初始微创方法,转换率为3.3%(n = 1759)。多变量分析显示,年龄增长会增加初次开腹手术(40岁至<65岁,调整后比值比为2.17;≥65岁,调整后比值比为3.00)或转为开腹胆囊切除术(40岁至<65岁,调整后比值比为2.20;≥65岁,调整后比值比为3.15)的可能性。同样,男性进行初次开腹手术(调整后比值比为1.70)或转为开腹胆囊切除术(调整后比值比为1.84)的几率更高。增加初次开腹手术或转为开腹胆囊切除术可能性的医院特征包括教学医院(分别为调整后比值比1.37和1.28)和安全网医院(分别为调整后比值比1.46和1.33)。

结论

关于胆囊切除术,微创外科手术方法与更好的患者预后相关,这一点已得到充分证实。我们的研究聚焦于急性胆囊炎的诊断,并确定年龄增长和男性是与开腹手术相关的重要因素。教学医院和安全网医院的状况也与开腹手术、转为开腹手术和微创胆囊切除术的差异使用有关。这些发现表明,有可能制定并应用策略,以在急性胆囊炎的情况下进一步减少开腹手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验