• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习方法解耦和预测天然气偏差因子

Decoupling and predicting natural gas deviation factor using machine learning methods.

作者信息

Geng Shaoyang, Zhai Shuo, Ye Jianwen, Gao Yajie, Luo Hao, Li Chengyong, Liu Xianshan, Liu Shudong

机构信息

Chengdu University of Technology, College of Energy, Chengdu, 610059, China.

Sinopec Southwest Oil and Gas Company, Chengdu, 611930, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72499-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-72499-5
PMID:39285210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11405880/
Abstract

Accurately predicting the deviation factor (Z-factor) of natural gas is crucial for the estimation of natural gas reserves, evaluation of gas reservoir recovery, and assessment of natural gas transport in pipelines. Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks (BiLSTM), often lack accuracy and robustness in various situations due to their inability to generalize across different gas components and temperature-pressure conditions. To address this limitation, we propose a novel and efficient machine learning framework for predicting natural gas Z-factor. Our approach first utilizes a signal decomposition algorithm like Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), Empirical Fourier Decomposition (EFD) and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) to decouple the Z-factor into multiple components. Subsequently, traditional machine learning algorithms is employed to predict each decomposed Z-factor component, where combination of SVM and VMD achieved the best performance. Decoupling the Z-factors firstly and then predicting the decoupled components can significantly improve prediction accuracy of all traditional machine learning algorithms. We thoroughly evaluate the impact of the decoupling method and the number of decomposed components on the model's performance. Compared to traditional machine learning models without decomposition, our framework achieves an average correlation coefficient exceeding 0.99 and an average mean absolute percentage error below 0.83% on 10 datasets with different natural gas components, high temperatures, and pressures. These results indicate that hybrid model effectively learns the patterns of Z-factor variations and can be applied to the prediction of natural gas Z-factors under various conditions. This study significantly advances methodologies for predicting natural gas properties, offering a unified and robust solution for precise estimations, thereby benefiting the natural gas industry in resource estimation and reservoir management.

摘要

准确预测天然气的偏差因子(Z 因子)对于天然气储量估算、气藏采收率评估以及管道天然气输送评估至关重要。传统机器学习算法,如支持向量机(SVM)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、轻量级梯度提升机(LightGBM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和双向长短期记忆神经网络(BiLSTM),由于无法在不同气体成分和温度 - 压力条件下进行泛化,在各种情况下往往缺乏准确性和鲁棒性。为解决这一局限性,我们提出了一种新颖且高效的用于预测天然气 Z 因子的机器学习框架。我们的方法首先利用诸如变分模态分解(VMD)、经验傅里叶分解(EFD)和集合经验模态分解(EEMD)等信号分解算法将 Z 因子解耦为多个分量。随后,采用传统机器学习算法预测每个解耦后的 Z 因子分量,其中 SVM 和 VMD 的组合表现最佳。首先对 Z 因子进行解耦,然后预测解耦后的分量,可以显著提高所有传统机器学习算法的预测准确性。我们全面评估了解耦方法和分解分量数量对模型性能的影响。与未进行分解的传统机器学习模型相比,我们的框架在 10 个具有不同天然气成分、高温和高压的数据集上实现了平均相关系数超过 0.99,平均平均绝对百分比误差低于 0.83%。这些结果表明,混合模型有效地学习了 Z 因子变化的模式,可应用于各种条件下天然气 Z 因子的预测。本研究显著推进了预测天然气性质的方法,为精确估计提供了统一且稳健的解决方案,从而使天然气行业在资源估计和油藏管理方面受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/959351d362ec/41598_2024_72499_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/0eae3d55c3be/41598_2024_72499_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/22188c30ab40/41598_2024_72499_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/21dfe8c2b497/41598_2024_72499_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/c2736483b2ea/41598_2024_72499_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/e1ca5c89e5e2/41598_2024_72499_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/167c4fd549ab/41598_2024_72499_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/09df85f5d5ee/41598_2024_72499_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/83f4957d2c69/41598_2024_72499_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/c1494c7905d7/41598_2024_72499_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/3ed82a6fe264/41598_2024_72499_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/959351d362ec/41598_2024_72499_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/0eae3d55c3be/41598_2024_72499_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/22188c30ab40/41598_2024_72499_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/21dfe8c2b497/41598_2024_72499_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/c2736483b2ea/41598_2024_72499_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/e1ca5c89e5e2/41598_2024_72499_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/167c4fd549ab/41598_2024_72499_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/09df85f5d5ee/41598_2024_72499_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/83f4957d2c69/41598_2024_72499_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/c1494c7905d7/41598_2024_72499_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/3ed82a6fe264/41598_2024_72499_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6878/11405880/959351d362ec/41598_2024_72499_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Decoupling and predicting natural gas deviation factor using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法解耦和预测天然气偏差因子
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72499-5.
2
A novel hybrid model based on two-stage data processing and machine learning for forecasting chlorophyll-a concentration in reservoirs.基于两阶段数据处理和机器学习的水库叶绿素-a 浓度预测新型混合模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(1):262-279. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31148-6. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
A Novel Hybrid Data-Driven Model for Daily Land Surface Temperature Forecasting Using Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition.基于集成经验模态分解的长短时记忆神经网络的新型混合数据驱动日地表面温度预测模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 21;15(5):1032. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051032.
4
Improving the prediction accuracy of river inflow using two data pre-processing techniques coupled with data-driven model.结合两种数据预处理技术和数据驱动模型提高河流流量预测精度。
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 6;7:e8043. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8043. eCollection 2019.
5
Design and implementation of a hybrid model based on two-layer decomposition method coupled with extreme learning machines to support real-time environmental monitoring of water quality parameters.基于两层分解方法与极限学习机相结合的混合模型的设计与实现,以支持水质参数的实时环境监测。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 15;648:839-853. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.221. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
6
Ensemble streamflow forecasting based on variational mode decomposition and long short term memory.基于变分模态分解和长短时记忆的集合流预测。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):518. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03725-7.
7
A new hybrid prediction model of air quality index based on secondary decomposition and improved kernel extreme learning machine.一种基于二次分解和改进核极限学习机的空气质量指数混合预测模型。
Chemosphere. 2022 Oct;305:135348. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135348. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Least square support vector machine-based variational mode decomposition: a new hybrid model for daily river water temperature modeling.基于最小二乘支持向量机的变分模态分解:一种用于日河流水温建模的新混合模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71555-71582. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20953-0. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.我们是否需要不同的机器学习算法来进行定量构效关系建模?对 16 种机器学习算法在 14 个定量构效关系数据集上的综合评估。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Jul 20;22(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa321.
10
Short-term natural gas load forecasting based on EL-VMD-Transformer-ResLSTM.基于EL-VMD-Transformer-ResLSTM的短期天然气负荷预测
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70384-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Spectral envelope-based adaptive empirical Fourier decomposition method and its application to rolling bearing fault diagnosis.基于谱包络的自适应经验傅里叶分解方法及其在滚动轴承故障诊断中的应用。
ISA Trans. 2022 Oct;129(Pt B):476-492. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.02.049. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Toolkits and Libraries for Deep Learning.深度学习的工具包和库。
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):400-405. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9965-6.