• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级急诊科刺伤攻击伤的评估:一项回顾性观察研究。

Evaluation of stabbing assault injuries in a tertiary emergency department: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Kartal Yeter Nil Deniz, Karaca Mehmet Ali, Yeter Ahmet Sefa, Öztürk İnce Elif, Erbil Bülent

机构信息

Vocational School of Health Services, First and Emergency Aid Program, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01077-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-024-01077-9
PMID:39285334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 458,000 victims were deceased from intentional violence in 2021. A stabbing assault causes 25% of homicides. The study aims to evaluate injury patterns, trauma scores, radiological findings, types of treatment, and outcomes of stab assault patients admitted to a tertiary emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of stabbing injury patients in the ED of Hacettepe University, Turkey. The sites and patterns of injury, radiological findings, treatment methods, consultations, and complications are acquired from the patient's files. Trauma scores and frequency of outcomes, such as the need for surgery, hospitalization, or mortality, were calculated for all patients.

RESULTS

Among the 648 patients, 564 (87%) were male. The median age was 28 (interquartile range [IQR]:13). The commonly injured body parts were the extremities (75%), thorax (21.9%), and abdomen (16.9%). The median RTS was 7,84 (IQR:0), and the median ISS was 2 (IQR:3). The fluid was detected in 13 of 88 patients by FAST, solid organ injuries in 21 patients, and gastric and intestinal injuries in 11 patients by abdominal CT. One hundred sixty-one patients underwent moderate and major surgery. Complications developed in 13 patients. 74,4% of the patients (n = 482) were treated in ED and 21.8% (n = 141) of patients were hospitalized in wards, 2.3% (n = 15) in intensive care unit and 1.5% (n = 10) patients died. GCS, RTS, and probability of survival (Ps) were significantly lower, and ISS was significantly higher in deceased patients and patients who needed erythrocyte replacement.

CONCLUSION

The majority of stab wounds were detected in extremities, but severe and lethal stabbing injuries were on the thorax and abdomen. In thoracoabdominal stabbing injuries, x-rays and FAST can be ineffective in detecting critical and fatal injuries. Therefore, thoracic and abdominal CT should be planned early to detect possible causes of death and make a timely and accurate diagnosis. Lower GCS, RTS, and Ps or higher ISS scores were related to the need for erythrocyte replacement.

摘要

背景

2021年约有45.8万名受害者死于故意暴力。刺伤导致25%的凶杀案。本研究旨在评估三级急诊科收治的刺伤患者的损伤模式、创伤评分、影像学检查结果、治疗类型及预后。

方法

这是一项对土耳其哈杰泰佩大学急诊科刺伤患者的回顾性观察研究。从患者病历中获取损伤部位和模式、影像学检查结果、治疗方法、会诊情况及并发症。计算所有患者的创伤评分及手术需求、住院情况或死亡率等预后频率。

结果

648例患者中,564例(87%)为男性。中位年龄为28岁(四分位间距[IQR]:13)。常见受伤身体部位为四肢(75%)、胸部(21.9%)和腹部(16.9%)。中位RTS为7.84(IQR:0),中位ISS为2(IQR:3)。88例患者中13例通过FAST检测到有积液,21例通过腹部CT检测到实质器官损伤,11例检测到胃肠道损伤。161例患者接受了中大型手术。13例患者出现并发症。74.4%的患者(n = 482)在急诊科接受治疗,21.8%(n = 141)的患者住院,2.3%(n = 15)入住重症监护病房,1.5%(n = 10)的患者死亡。死亡患者和需要红细胞置换的患者的GCS、RTS和生存概率(Ps)显著更低,而ISS显著更高。

结论

大多数刺伤发生在四肢,但严重和致命的刺伤发生在胸部和腹部。在胸腹刺伤中,X线和FAST可能无法有效检测到关键和致命损伤。因此,应尽早安排胸部和腹部CT检查,以发现可能的死亡原因并做出及时准确的诊断。较低的GCS、RTS和Ps评分或较高的ISS评分与红细胞置换需求相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c9c/11406762/7be1a3e0a364/12873_2024_1077_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c9c/11406762/7be1a3e0a364/12873_2024_1077_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c9c/11406762/7be1a3e0a364/12873_2024_1077_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of stabbing assault injuries in a tertiary emergency department: a retrospective observational study.三级急诊科刺伤攻击伤的评估:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01077-9.
2
Evaluation of gunshot wounds in the emergency department.急诊科枪伤评估
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Jul;21(4):248-55. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.64495.
3
The correlation between stabbing-related upper extremity wounds and survival of stabbing victims with abdominal and thoracic injuries.与刺伤相关的上肢伤口与腹部和胸部受伤刺伤受害者生存率之间的相关性。
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1522-1526. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 May 1.
4
Different Patterns in Abdominal Stab Wound in the Self-Inflicted and Assaulted Patients: An Observational Analysis of Single Center Experience.自我伤害和受攻击患者腹部刺伤的不同模式:单中心经验的观察性分析
Kobe J Med Sci. 2017 Jul 20;63(1):E17-E21.
5
Stab wounds in a Swiss emergency department: a series of 80 consecutive cases.瑞士急诊部的刺伤:80 连续病例系列。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Aug 24;140:w13058. doi: 10.4414/smw.2010.13058. eCollection 2010.
6
Penetrating stab injuries in Iceland: a whole-nation study on incidence and outcome in patients hospitalized for penetrating stab injuries.冰岛的穿透性刺伤:一项全国性研究,调查因穿透性刺伤而住院患者的发病率和结局。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 23;27(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0582-2.
7
Penetrating stab injuries at a single urban unit: are we missing the point?一个城市单元的穿透性刺伤:我们是否抓错重点了?
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Jun;184(2):449-55. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1141-0. Epub 2014 May 28.
8
Overview of stab injuries in Far North Queensland: A new insight into the demographics, injury patterns and management.
Injury. 2023 May;54(5):1386-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.031. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
9
Urgent thoracotomy for penetrating chest trauma: analysis of 158 patients of a single center.急诊开胸术治疗穿透性胸部创伤:单中心 158 例分析。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):900-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.004.
10
Predicting mortality in penetrating thoracic trauma in the emergency department: The prognostic value of the glucose-to-potassium ratio.急诊科穿透性胸部创伤患者死亡率的预测:血糖与血钾比值的预后价值
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Jan;31(1):40-46. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.96644.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Traumatic Injuries Associated with Subway Incidents at a Level 1 Trauma Center.一级创伤中心与地铁事故相关的创伤性损伤的临床结果及模式
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 3;15(1):51. doi: 10.3390/life15010051.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes in Pediatric Trauma Patients Who Receive Blood Transfusion.儿科创伤患者输血的结果。
J Surg Res. 2023 Feb;282:232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Mortality prediction by 'Life Threat Index' compared to widely used trauma scoring systems.生命威胁指数预测死亡率与广泛使用的创伤评分系统比较。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2022 Jun 24;29(2):258-263. doi: 10.26444/aaem/142182. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
3
Penetrating injuries in Germany - epidemiology, management and outcome an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.
德国的穿透性损伤 - 基于创伤登记处 DGU®的流行病学、处理和结局分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 13;29(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00895-1.
4
Assessment of blood consumption score for pediatrics predicts transfusion requirements for children with trauma.评估儿科血液消耗评分可预测创伤儿童的输血需求。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 5;100(9):e25014. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025014.
5
The rising burden of penetrating knife injuries.穿透性刀伤负担日益加重。
Inj Prev. 2021 Oct;27(5):467-471. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-044016. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Comparison of massive and emergency transfusion prediction scoring systems after trauma with a new Bleeding Risk Index score applied in-flight.创伤后大量和紧急输血预测评分系统的比较,应用了一种新的 Bleeding Risk Index 评分,在飞行中进行。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Feb 1;90(2):268-273. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003031.
7
Endovascular treatment of blunt injury of the extracranial internal carotid artery: the prospect and dilemma.血管内治疗颅外颈内动脉钝性损伤:前景与困境。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Jan 1;18(4):944-952. doi: 10.7150/ijms.50275. eCollection 2021.
8
Analysis of anatomical localization and severity of injury in patients with blood transfusion in urban terrain hospital.城市地形医院输血患者解剖定位和损伤严重程度分析。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Nov;26(6):937-942. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.94789.
9
A Comparative Study of Injury Severity Scales as Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients: Which Scale Is the Best?创伤患者损伤严重程度评分作为死亡率预测指标的比较研究:哪种评分最佳?
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Jan;8(1):27-33. doi: 10.29252/beat-080105.
10
Diagnostic laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma.穿透性腹部创伤的诊断性腹腔镜检查
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Apr;89(4):353-356. doi: 10.1111/ans.15140. Epub 2019 Mar 14.