• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷冻消融与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾肿瘤的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, No. 1 Maoyuan South Road, Shunqing district, Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, P.R. China.

Department of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, No. 234 Fujiang Road Shunqing, Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000, P.R. China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1150. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12917-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-12917-z
PMID:39285347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403780/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study utilizes a meta-analytic approach to investigate the effects of cryoablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy on perioperative outcomes, postoperative renal function, and oncological results in patients.

METHODS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database) were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published in English up to November 2023. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, postoperative renal function and oncologic outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 10 studies comprising 2,011 patients. Compared to RAPN (Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy), the CA (Cryoablation) group had a shorter hospital stay [MD -1.76 days; 95% CI -3.12 to -0.41; p = 0.01], less blood loss [MD -104.60 ml; 95% CI -152.58 to -56.62; p < 0.0001], and fewer overall complications [OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; p = 0.004], but a higher recurrence rate [OR 7.83; 95% CI 4.32 to 14.19; p < 0.00001]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2), major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-5), changes in renal function at 12 months post-operation, RFS (Recurrence-Free Survival), and OS (Overall Survival).

CONCLUSION

The evidence provided by this meta-analysis indicates that the therapeutic effects of Cryoablation (CA) are similar to those of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function. However, the recurrence rate of tumors treated with CA is significantly higher.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The study has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023465846).

摘要

目的

本研究采用荟萃分析方法,探讨冷冻消融和机器人辅助部分肾切除术对患者围手术期结局、术后肾功能和肿瘤学结果的影响。

方法

本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。系统检索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库),以确定截至 2023 年 11 月发表的英文相关研究。主要结局是围手术期结果、并发症、术后肾功能和肿瘤学结果。使用 Review Manager 5.4 进行分析。

结果

本研究共纳入 10 项研究,共计 2011 例患者。与 RAPN(机器人辅助部分肾切除术)相比,CA(冷冻消融)组的住院时间更短[MD -1.76 天;95%CI -3.12 至 -0.41;p=0.01],出血量更少[MD -104.60ml;95%CI -152.58 至 -56.62;p<0.0001],总体并发症更少[OR 0.62;95%CI 0.45 至 0.86;p=0.004],但复发率更高[OR 7.83;95%CI 4.32 至 14.19;p<0.00001]。两组在手术时间、轻度并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级 1-2)、重度并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级 3-5)、术后 12 个月肾功能变化、RFS(无复发生存率)和 OS(总体生存率)方面无显著差异。

结论

本荟萃分析提供的证据表明,冷冻消融(CA)的治疗效果在围手术期结果和肾功能方面与机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)相似,但 CA 治疗的肿瘤复发率明显更高。

系统评价注册

该研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO:CRD42023465846)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/ff3cf682aac4/12885_2024_12917_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/60721f682ac8/12885_2024_12917_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/8fdec1510100/12885_2024_12917_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/65c9ef4ab68c/12885_2024_12917_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/ff3cf682aac4/12885_2024_12917_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/60721f682ac8/12885_2024_12917_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/8fdec1510100/12885_2024_12917_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/65c9ef4ab68c/12885_2024_12917_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/942e/11403780/ff3cf682aac4/12885_2024_12917_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冷冻消融与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾肿瘤的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1150. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12917-z.
2
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹腔与后腹腔途径治疗后外侧肾肿瘤的围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 29;18(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01963-1.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结果比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
4
Single-Port Multiport Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Meta-Analysis.单端口多端口机器人辅助部分肾切除术:荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2024 Mar;38(3):253-261. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0505. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
Percutaneous ablation versus robotic‑assisted partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.经皮消融与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 cT1 期肾细胞癌:比较结局的循证分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 30;18(1):301. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02037-y.
6
Comparison of single-port versus multi-port robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes.单孔与多孔机器人辅助部分肾切除术的比较:围手术期和肿瘤学结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 13;18(1):321. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02066-7.
7
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 7): an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助与开放部分肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿瘤(RENAL 评分≥7)的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果:基于证据的分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1247-1258. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01565-3. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
8
Percutaneous Ablation Versus Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in the Treatment of cT1b Renal Tumors: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of a Propensity Score-weighted Analysis.经皮消融与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗 cT1b 期肾肿瘤:倾向评分匹配分析的肿瘤学和功能结局。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Apr;18(2):138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic cryoablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal tumors.腹腔镜冷冻消融术与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗小肾肿瘤的围手术期及肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
Focal therapy versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the management of clinical T1 renal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.聚焦治疗与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗临床T1期肾肿块的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(45):e13102. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013102.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional virtual model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis with a contemporary control group.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的三维虚拟模型:与当代对照组的倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2024 May 20;42(1):338. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05043-9.
2
Morbidity of elective surgery for localized renal masses among elderly patients: A contemporary multicenter study.老年患者局限性肾肿块择期手术的发病率:一项当代多中心研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;49(10):107014. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107014. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Impact of Surgical Experience Before Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Surgical Outcomes: A Multicenter Analysis of 2500 Patients.
机器人辅助部分肾切除术之前的手术经验对手术结果的影响:一项对2500例患者的多中心分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Oct 26;46:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.10.003. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Cryoablation in Elderly Patients with Renal Cancer.老年肾癌患者机器人辅助部分肾切除术与冷冻消融术临床结局的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;14(23):5843. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235843.
5
Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update.肾细胞癌的流行病学:2022 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2022 Nov;82(5):529-542. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.019. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
6
Differential efficacy of ablation therapy versus partial nephrectomy between clinical T1a and T1b renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.临床 T1a 和 T1b 期肾肿瘤消融治疗与部分肾切除术疗效的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Jul;40(7):315-330. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 May 11.
7
Screening programs for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review by the EAU young academic urologists renal cancer working group.筛查肾细胞癌的方案:EAU 青年学术泌尿外科学家肾癌工作组的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2023 Apr;41(4):929-940. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03993-6. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会肾癌指南:2022 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
9
Impact of Trifecta definition on rates and predictors of "successful" robotic partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses: results from the Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score International Consortium.三因素定义对局部肾肿瘤行机器人辅助部分肾切除术“成功”的发生率和预测因素的影响:来自表面-中间-基底切缘评分国际联盟的结果。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):186-193. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04601-2.
10
Recent progress in cryoablation cancer therapy and nanoparticles mediated cryoablation.冷冻消融癌症治疗和纳米颗粒介导的冷冻消融的最新进展。
Theranostics. 2022 Feb 14;12(5):2175-2204. doi: 10.7150/thno.67530. eCollection 2022.