• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康专业人员对电子健康记录系统的看法:加纳的一项混合方法研究。

Health professionals' perceptions of electronic health records system: a mixed method study in Ghana.

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02672-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02672-3
PMID:39285423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403855/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic Health Record systems (EHRs) offer significant benefits and have transformed healthcare in developed countries. However, their implementation and adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains low due to challenges and competing interests. Health professionals' perception of EHRs can influence their adoption and continued use. The objectives of this study are to explore the perception of health professionals regarding implemented EHR systems in three hospitals in Ghana and identify factors influencing their perception and satisfaction.

METHODS

In this study, we employed a concurrent mixed method design to collect data from study participants from May to June 2023. The quantitative part employed a descriptive-survey and the qualitative (in-depth interview) techniques was applied. After obtaining written informed consent from each respondent, a structured survey questionnaire was filled out by the health professionals from three hospitals. An a priori power calculation was used to determine the sample size for the quantitative component. Two hundred and sixty-three (263) health professionals completed the questionnaire from the three facilities. A purposive sampling technique was used to select fifteen [1] participants for the interviews. A semi-structured interview guide was used for the in-depth interviews. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded into themes using QSR Nvivo 12 software before thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that 213 (80.99%) health professionals perceived the EHRs as beneficial to patients and were generally satisfied. An overwhelming majority, 197 (74.90%) of the health professionals, were satisfied with its use and expressed interest in continuing to use the system. The majority of health professionals viewed the EHRs to have improved their work and workflow processes and provided the desired results. However, few other health professionals were dissatisfied with the system because they viewed the EHRs as frustrating due to unstable internet connectivity and power supply. Other concerns were related to the privacy and confidentiality of patient information. They believe access to patient information should be on a need-to-know basis, and patient information should not be accessible to all other clinicians except those involved directly in their care processes.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that health professionals have a positive perception of the implemented EHRs, are highly satisfied with them, and are interested in continuing to use them. However, health professionals' concerns about the unstable power supply, poor internet connectivity, security, and confidentiality of patient's information need attention, to mitigate their frustrations and boost their confidence in the system.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录系统(EHRs)在发达国家带来了显著的益处,并改变了医疗保健方式。然而,由于挑战和利益冲突,它们在中低收入国家(LMICs)的实施和采用仍然很低。卫生专业人员对 EHRs 的看法会影响他们的采用和持续使用。本研究的目的是探讨加纳三家医院卫生专业人员对已实施的 EHR 系统的看法,并确定影响他们看法和满意度的因素。

方法

在这项研究中,我们采用了同时进行的混合方法设计,从 2023 年 5 月至 6 月从研究参与者那里收集数据。定量部分采用描述性调查,定性(深入访谈)技术。在每位受访者书面同意后,从三家医院的卫生专业人员填写了一份结构化的调查问卷。使用事先的功效计算来确定定量部分的样本量。263 名卫生专业人员完成了来自三家医疗机构的问卷。采用目的抽样技术从 15 名参与者中选择了[1]名进行访谈。使用半结构化访谈指南进行深入访谈。访谈内容被录音、转录,并使用 QSR Nvivo 12 软件编码为主题,然后进行主题内容分析。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,213 名(80.99%)卫生专业人员认为 EHRs 对患者有益,并普遍感到满意。绝大多数,197(74.90%)卫生专业人员对其使用感到满意,并表示有兴趣继续使用该系统。大多数卫生专业人员认为 EHRs 改善了他们的工作和工作流程,并提供了预期的结果。然而,也有少数卫生专业人员对系统不满意,因为他们认为 EHRs 由于不稳定的网络连接和电源供应而令人沮丧。其他问题与患者信息的隐私和保密性有关。他们认为,只有需要了解患者信息的人才可以访问患者信息,并且患者信息不应被所有其他临床医生访问,除非他们直接参与患者的护理过程。

结论

该研究表明,卫生专业人员对已实施的 EHRs 有积极的看法,对其高度满意,并有兴趣继续使用。然而,卫生专业人员对电力供应不稳定、网络连接差、安全性和患者信息保密性的担忧需要引起关注,以减轻他们的挫败感并增强他们对系统的信心。

相似文献

1
Health professionals' perceptions of electronic health records system: a mixed method study in Ghana.健康专业人员对电子健康记录系统的看法:加纳的一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02672-3.
2
Electronic health records post-implementation challenges in selected hospitals: A qualitative study in the Central Region of southern Ghana.加纳南部中部地区部分医院电子健康记录实施后的挑战:一项定性研究
Health Inf Manag. 2023 Sep;52(3):204-211. doi: 10.1177/18333583221096899. Epub 2022 May 15.
3
Perceived impact of digital health technology on health professionals and their work: A qualitative study in Southern Ghana.数字健康技术对卫生专业人员及其工作的感知影响:加纳南部的一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 6;9:20552076231218838. doi: 10.1177/20552076231218838. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Usability evaluation of electronic health records at the trauma and emergency directorates at the Komfo Anokye teaching hospital in the Ashanti region of Ghana.加纳阿散蒂地区科姆福·安诺耶教学医院创伤和急诊部门电子病历的可用性评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02636-7.
5
Perceptions of healthcare professionals about the adoption and use of EHR in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a systematic review.海湾合作委员会国家医疗保健专业人员对电子健康记录采用和使用的看法:一项系统综述
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100099.
6
Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.公众和医生对电子健康记录的期望和伦理关注:除了信息安全外,好处大于风险。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Adoption of Electronic Personal Health Records in Canada: Perceptions of Stakeholders.加拿大电子个人健康记录的采用:利益相关者的看法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jul 1;5(7):425-433. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.36.
8
Satisfied or not satisfied? Electronic health records system implementation in Ghana: Health leaders' perspective.满意还是不满意?加纳电子健康记录系统的实施:卫生领导人的观点。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01998-0.
9
Mental Health Care Professionals' Appraisal of Patients' Use of Web-Based Access to Their Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study.精神健康护理专业人员对患者使用其电子健康记录的网络访问的评估:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e28045. doi: 10.2196/28045.
10
Health providers' readiness for electronic health records adoption: A cross-sectional study of two hospitals in northern Ghana.卫生提供者对电子健康记录采用的准备情况:加纳北部两家医院的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0231569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231569. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
A decade of designing and implementing electronic health records in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区十年电子健康记录设计与实施情况:一项范围综述
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2492913. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2492913. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
3
The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.电子健康记录设计对可用性和用药安全的影响:系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived impact of digital health technology on health professionals and their work: A qualitative study in Southern Ghana.数字健康技术对卫生专业人员及其工作的感知影响:加纳南部的一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 6;9:20552076231218838. doi: 10.1177/20552076231218838. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Satisfied or not satisfied? Electronic health records system implementation in Ghana: Health leaders' perspective.满意还是不满意?加纳电子健康记录系统的实施:卫生领导人的观点。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01998-0.
3
Electronic health records post-implementation challenges in selected hospitals: A qualitative study in the Central Region of southern Ghana.加纳南部中部地区部分医院电子健康记录实施后的挑战:一项定性研究
Health Inf Manag. 2023 Sep;52(3):204-211. doi: 10.1177/18333583221096899. Epub 2022 May 15.
4
Performance, Barriers, and Satisfaction of Healthcare Workers Toward Electronic Medical Records in Saudi Arabia: A National Multicenter Study.沙特阿拉伯医护人员对电子病历的绩效、障碍及满意度:一项全国多中心研究
Cureus. 2022 Feb 4;14(2):e21899. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21899. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Implementation challenges and perception of care providers on Electronic Medical Records at St. Paul's and Ayder Hospitals, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚的圣保罗医院和阿德尔医院,电子病历的实施挑战和医护人员的认知。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01670-z.
6
The impact on health outcomes of implementing electronic health records to support the care of older people in residential aged care: A scoping review.实施电子健康记录以支持老年人在养老院中的护理对健康结果的影响:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jul;151:104471. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104471. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Use of multifunctional electronic health records and burnout among primary care nurse practitioners.多功能电子健康记录的使用与基层医疗护理从业者的倦怠。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021 Jan 27;33(12):1182-1189. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000533.
8
Clinicians perceptions of a telemedicine system: a mixed method study of Makassar City, Indonesia.印度尼西亚望加锡市的一项混合方法研究:临床医生对远程医疗系统的看法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01234-7.
9
Education and Training on Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) for health care professionals and students: A Scoping Review.医疗卫生专业人员和学生的电子病历(EMR)教育和培训:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Oct;142:104238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104238. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Analysis of end-user satisfaction with electronic health records in college/university healthcare.高校医疗中终端用户对电子健康记录的满意度分析。
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Apr;70(3):717-723. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1762610. Epub 2020 Jun 12.