• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在现实世界中实现卓越诊断:应对复杂性、不确定性和临床责任。

Enabling diagnostic excellence in the real world: Managing complexity, uncertainty and clinical responsibility.

作者信息

Cunningham Nicola, Cook Helmy, Harrison Julia

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2025 Mar;47(3):404-406. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2402032. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2402032
PMID:39285517
Abstract

Diagnostic error is a significant category within preventable patient harm, and it takes many years of effort to develop proficiency in diagnostic reasoning. One of the key challenges medical schools must address is preparing students for the complexity, uncertainty and clinical responsibility in going from student to doctor. Recognising the importance of both cognitive and systems-related factors in diagnostic accuracy, we designed the QUID Prompt (Questions to Use for Improving Diagnosis) for students to refer to at the bedside. This set of questions prompts careful consideration, analysis, and signposting of decision-making processes, to assist students in transitioning from medical school to the real-world of work and achieving diagnostic excellence in clinical settings.

摘要

诊断错误是可预防的患者伤害中的一个重要类别,培养诊断推理能力需要多年的努力。医学院校必须应对的关键挑战之一是让学生为从学生转变为医生过程中的复杂性、不确定性和临床责任做好准备。认识到认知因素和系统相关因素在诊断准确性中的重要性,我们设计了QUID提示(用于改进诊断的问题)供学生在床边参考。这组问题促使对决策过程进行仔细思考、分析并指明方向,以帮助学生从医学院过渡到实际工作环境,并在临床环境中实现卓越诊断。

相似文献

1
Enabling diagnostic excellence in the real world: Managing complexity, uncertainty and clinical responsibility.在现实世界中实现卓越诊断:应对复杂性、不确定性和临床责任。
Med Teach. 2025 Mar;47(3):404-406. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2402032. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Clinical reasoning-the essentials for teaching medical students, trainees and non-medical healthcare professionals.临床推理——医学学生、受训者和非医疗保健专业人员教学必备。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Jul 30;85(7):1-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0052. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Personality traits predict the need for cognitive closure in advanced undergraduate medical students.人格特质预测医科大学生对认知闭合的需求。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 8;24(1):1280. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06283-4.
4
Reliability, validity and acceptability of an online clinical reasoning simulator for medical students: An international pilot.在线医学生临床推理模拟工具的信度、效度和可接受性:一项国际试点研究。
Med Teach. 2024 Sep;46(9):1220-1227. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2308082. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Fostering medical students' clinical reasoning by learning from errors in clinical case vignettes: effects and conditions of additional prompting procedures to foster self-explanations.从临床病例情景中学习错误来培养医学生的临床推理能力:促进自我解释的额外提示程序的效果和条件。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 May;24(2):331-351. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-09870-5. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education: A Primer for Medical Students.医学教育中的临床推理:医学生入门。
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Aug-Sep;36(4):547-555. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2230201. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
7
Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students.医学知识和团队合作可预测病例总结陈述的质量,而病例总结陈述是本科医学生临床推理的一项指标。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Nov 15;36(6):Doc83. doi: 10.3205/zma001291. eCollection 2019.
8
Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact.学习临床推理:虚拟患者病例格式和先验知识如何相互作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y.
9
Clerkship Students' Use of Clinical Reasoning Concepts After a Pre-clinical Reasoning Course.临床实习前推理课程后见习学生对临床推理概念的运用
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1359-1366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09279-4. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
10
The Assessment of Reasoning Tool (ART): structuring the conversation between teachers and learners.推理评估工具(ART):构建教师与学习者之间的对话
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Nov 27;5(4):197-203. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0052.