State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Geriatric Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Int Endod J. 2024 Dec;57(12):1700-1716. doi: 10.1111/iej.14140. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Postoperative endodontic pain (PEP) is crucial in clinical practice. Recently, the effects of various laser adjuvant therapies in endodontic treatments have been widely evaluated. However, as a virtually side-effect-free treatment, its effect on postoperative pain management during endodontic treatment remains controversial.
This review aimed to compare the efficacy of laser adjuvant therapy for pain management after endodontic treatment.
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for articles published until 12 February 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Data on continuous outcomes of visual analogue scale pain scores are expressed as standard mean difference (SMD) and dichotomous outcomes of pain prevalence as relative risk (RR).
We included 22 studies, of which 15 enrolled 892 patients with visual analogue scale pain scores and 7 enrolled 422 patients with pain prevalence. Of the 22 studies, seven studies had a low risk of bias, 10 had a moderate risk of bias and 5 had a high risk of bias. For pain level, the pooled outcomes indicated reduced pain scores in all laser adjuvant therapy, including low-level laser therapy (SMD = -0.86 [95% CI: -1.16, -0.55] in 24 h and SMD = -0.64 [95% CI: -0.84, -0.43] in 48 h), diode laser therapy (SMD = -0.27 [95% CI: -0.50, -0.04] in 48 h) and photodynamic therapy (SMD = -1.12 [95% CI: -2.18, -0.05] in 24 h). For postoperative pain incidence, a significant correlation was observed with reduced pain incidence rates in the photodynamic therapy group (pooled RR = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.72]) but not in the low-level laser therapy group (RR = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.30, 2.70] at 12 h and RR = 0.57 [95% CI: 0.09, 3.72] at 24 h).
High-quality evidence suggests that laser adjuvant therapies such as low-level laser therapy, diode laser therapy and photodynamic therapy have a positive impact on reducing postoperative endodontic pain intensity. However, the differences in PEP management effects between laser therapies are unknown, and no significant differences were observed among the subgroups.
CRD 42023402872 (PROSPERO).
术后根管治疗疼痛(PEP)在临床实践中至关重要。最近,各种激光辅助疗法在根管治疗中的效果已被广泛评估。然而,作为一种几乎没有副作用的治疗方法,其在根管治疗中对术后疼痛管理的影响仍存在争议。
本综述旨在比较激光辅助疗法在根管治疗后疼痛管理方面的疗效。
系统检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中截至 2023 年 2 月 12 日发表的文章。根据 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。连续结局的视觉模拟评分疼痛数据表示为标准均数差(SMD),二分类结局的疼痛发生率表示为相对风险(RR)。
我们纳入了 22 项研究,其中 15 项研究纳入了 892 名接受视觉模拟评分疼痛的患者,7 项研究纳入了 422 名疼痛发生率的患者。22 项研究中,7 项研究的偏倚风险较低,10 项研究的偏倚风险为中度,5 项研究的偏倚风险较高。对于疼痛程度,汇总结果表明所有激光辅助治疗均降低了疼痛评分,包括低水平激光治疗(24 小时 SMD = -0.86 [95%CI:-1.16,-0.55];48 小时 SMD = -0.64 [95%CI:-0.84,-0.43])、二极管激光治疗(48 小时 SMD = -0.27 [95%CI:-0.50,-0.04])和光动力治疗(24 小时 SMD = -1.12 [95%CI:-2.18,-0.05])。对于术后疼痛发生率,光动力治疗组的疼痛发生率显著降低(汇总 RR = 0.47 [95%CI:0.31,0.72]),但低水平激光治疗组(12 小时 RR = 0.89 [95%CI:0.30,2.70];24 小时 RR = 0.57 [95%CI:0.09,3.72])则没有显著差异。
高质量证据表明,低水平激光治疗、二极管激光治疗和光动力治疗等激光辅助疗法对减轻术后根管治疗疼痛强度具有积极影响。然而,激光治疗在 PEP 管理效果方面的差异尚不清楚,且各亚组之间未观察到显著差异。
CRD 42023402872(PROSPERO)。