Iqbal Zaheen A, Hung Kevin, Gu Jialiang, Chow Daniel H
Department of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2025 Feb;65(2):188-200. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16120-8. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Treadmills have been used in laboratories to assess various measures related to walking and running. However, there has been some skepticism regarding their reliability as a representation of outdoor running. While marathon running has gained popularity as a form of physical activity, there have been few studies examining stride-to-stride variability after distance running, especially in relation to the duration and surface of running. This study compared stride time and lower limb joint angles during distance treadmill running and running over-ground. The hypothesis was that stride-to-stride variability would be influenced by running duration and surface, with greater variability observed during outdoor running.
Eleven runners participated in the study, running on a treadmill and over-ground for 31 minutes at their preferred speed. Inertial measurement units were used to measure stride time, total range of motion, and joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle in different phases of the gait cycle in the sagittal plane movements. Mean and coefficient of variation of each parameter were compared between the initial and final 5 minutes of running on the treadmill and over-ground.
There were no significant differences in stride time or its variability based on running duration or surface. However, mean and variability of certain lower limb joint angles were higher during outdoor running, supporting the hypothesis. Variability was higher in the initial duration of running as compared to final phase of running.
These findings suggest that treadmill may not fully reflect the dynamics of running over-ground. It is important to consider variability in gait analysis and research, as well as the potential impact on training and clinical practice.
跑步机已在实验室中用于评估与步行和跑步相关的各种指标。然而,对于其作为户外跑步代表的可靠性存在一些质疑。虽然马拉松跑步作为一种体育活动形式越来越受欢迎,但很少有研究考察长跑后的步幅间变异性,特别是与跑步持续时间和路面的关系。本研究比较了在跑步机上长跑和户外跑步时的步幅时间和下肢关节角度。假设是步幅间变异性会受到跑步持续时间和路面的影响,户外跑步时变异性更大。
11名跑步者参与了该研究,分别在跑步机上和户外以其偏好的速度跑31分钟。使用惯性测量单元测量矢状面运动中步态周期不同阶段的步幅时间、总运动范围以及髋、膝和踝关节的关节角度。比较了在跑步机上和户外跑步最初5分钟和最后5分钟各参数的平均值和变异系数。
基于跑步持续时间或路面,步幅时间或其变异性没有显著差异。然而,户外跑步时某些下肢关节角度的平均值和变异性更高,支持了该假设。与跑步最后阶段相比,跑步初始阶段的变异性更高。
这些发现表明跑步机可能无法完全反映户外跑步的动力学。在步态分析和研究中考虑变异性以及对训练和临床实践的潜在影响很重要。