Lecomte Raphaël, Deschanvres Colin, Le Bourgeois Amandine, Bart Géraldine, Mahieu Rafaël, Le Moal Gwénaël, Ansart Séverine, Asseray Nathalie, Ruffier d'Epenoux Louise, Corvec Stéphane, Boutoille David
Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Unité d'Investigation Clinique 1413 INSERM, CHU Nantes, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Dec 2;79(12):3109-3115. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae328.
Co-trimoxazole could be an alternative antibiotic to treat device-related bone and joint infection (BJI) but there are few published data about its efficacy and safety in this complex scenario to treat infection. The objective was to compare the outcome of patients with device-related BJI treated with an antibiotic regimen including co-trimoxazole versus a regimen without co-trimoxazole.
This multicentre case-control study included consecutive adult patients diagnosed with device-related BJI. Each patient receiving co-trimoxazole was included in the co-trimoxazole group and was matched with two control patients, with stratification on microbial aetiology and age. The primary outcome was composite and defined by death or treatment failure during the follow-up.
In this study, 150 patients were included, 50 in the co-trimoxazole group and 100 in the control group. The rate of reaching the primary endpoint was 18% in the co-trimoxazole group (9/50 cases) versus 21% in the control group (21/100) (P = 0.66). Co-trimoxazole use was not associated with an unfavourable outcome in the multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.31-2.06, P = 0.64). Although no significant difference was observed in premature discontinuation of treatment due to an adverse event between both groups (14 versus 12%, P = 0.73), treatment-related adverse events were significantly more frequently reported in patients of the co-trimoxazole group than the control group [34% (17/50) versus 18% (18/100), P = 0.03].
Co-trimoxazole appears to be an effective alternative for the treatment of BJI, even when it occurs on a device, but the safety profile requires close monitoring of adverse effects.
复方新诺明可能是治疗与器械相关的骨和关节感染(BJI)的一种替代抗生素,但在这种复杂的感染治疗情况下,关于其疗效和安全性的已发表数据很少。目的是比较接受含复方新诺明抗生素方案治疗的与器械相关BJI患者与未接受复方新诺明方案治疗的患者的结局。
这项多中心病例对照研究纳入了连续诊断为与器械相关BJI的成年患者。接受复方新诺明治疗的每位患者纳入复方新诺明组,并与两名对照患者匹配,根据微生物病因和年龄进行分层。主要结局是复合结局,定义为随访期间的死亡或治疗失败。
本研究共纳入150例患者,复方新诺明组50例,对照组100例。复方新诺明组达到主要终点的比例为18%(9/50例),而对照组为21%(21/100)(P = 0.66)。在多变量分析中,使用复方新诺明与不良结局无关(调整后的比值比为0.8,95%置信区间为0.31 - 2.06,P = 0.64)。尽管两组因不良事件导致治疗提前停药的情况无显著差异(14%对12%,P = 0.73),但复方新诺明组患者报告的与治疗相关的不良事件明显多于对照组[34%(17/50)对18%(18/100),P = 0.03]。
复方新诺明似乎是治疗BJI的一种有效替代药物,即使是发生在有植入器械的情况下,但安全性方面需要密切监测不良反应。