Suppr超能文献

石器工具制造的能量消耗在新手和熟练工匠之间有所不同。

Stone toolmaking energy expenditure differs between novice and expert toolmakers.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York, USA.

Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Am J Biol Anthropol. 2024 Dec;185(4):e25026. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.25026. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the energetic costs associated with Oldowan-style flake production and how skill differences influence these costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine adult participants, including novice and expert toolmakers, underwent a 2-h experimental session where we measured energy expenditure and flaking outcomes. We measured body mass (kg), percent body fat, and fat-free mass (kg) and used open-circuit indirect calorimetry to quantify energy expenditure. The lithic analysis used standard linear and mass measurements on the resulting cores and flakes. Qualitative observations from the video recordings provide insight into the subject's body positions and hand grips.

RESULTS

Results reveal significant differences in energy expenditure between novice and expert toolmakers, with experts demonstrating lower overall energy expenditure. Additionally, experts produced more flakes, reduced greater core mass per unit of energy expenditure, and exhibited distinct body positions, hand grips, and core/flake morphologies compared with novices.

DISCUSSION

The study provides novel insights into the bio-cultural impacts of stone toolmaking skill acquisition, suggesting that skilled performance reduces the metabolic costs of stone tool production. These findings contribute to debates surrounding the origins of human cultural capacities and highlight the importance of including energy expenditure measures in knapping experiments. Moreover, the results suggest that the presence or absence of expertise in the Paleolithic would have fundamentally altered selective pressures and the reliability of skill reproduction. This study enhances our understanding of differences in stone toolmaking skill and their implications for human energy allocation strategies during early technological evolution.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了与奥杜威式石片制作相关的能量成本,以及技能差异如何影响这些成本。

材料与方法

9 名成年参与者,包括新手和熟练工具制造者,参加了 2 小时的实验,在此期间我们测量了能量消耗和剥落结果。我们测量了体重(kg)、体脂百分比和去脂体重(kg),并使用开路间接量热法来量化能量消耗。石器分析使用标准线性和质量测量方法对得到的核心和石片进行测量。视频记录中的定性观察提供了关于主体身体姿势和手握持的见解。

结果

结果表明,新手和熟练工具制造者之间的能量消耗存在显著差异,熟练者的总能量消耗较低。此外,与新手相比,熟练者生产的石片更多,单位能量消耗下减少的核心质量更大,并且表现出明显不同的身体姿势、手握持方式以及核心/石片形态。

讨论

该研究为石器制作技能习得的生物文化影响提供了新的见解,表明熟练的表现降低了石器制作的代谢成本。这些发现为有关人类文化能力起源的争论做出了贡献,并强调了在石器实验中纳入能量消耗测量的重要性。此外,结果表明,在旧石器时代是否具有专业知识从根本上改变了选择压力和技能再现的可靠性。本研究增进了我们对石器制作技能差异的理解及其对早期技术进化过程中人类能量分配策略的影响。

相似文献

2
Kinetics of stone tool production among novice and expert tool makers.新手和熟练工匠制造石器工具的动力学研究。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Apr;174(4):714-727. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24159. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
7
A primate model for the origin of flake technology.石器技术起源的灵长类动物模型。
J Hum Evol. 2022 Oct;171:103250. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103250. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
9
Technology, expertise and social cognition in human evolution.人类进化中的技术、专业知识和社会认知。
Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Apr;33(7):1328-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07619.x. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
10
Coordination strategies used in stone knapping.石器加工中的协同策略。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Apr;150(4):539-50. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22224. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Skill and efficiency in Acheulian giant core reduction.阿舍利文化巨型石核加工的技能与效率。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 25;12(6):250695. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250695. eCollection 2025 Jun.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验