• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在斑马线上,有人驾驶和自动驾驶车辆应该如何行驶?确定可接受的停车距离和出发时间。

How should human-driven and autonomous vehicles behave at a zebra crossing? Determining acceptable stopping distances and setting-off times.

机构信息

Arden University, Birmingham, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

University of Hull, Hull, UK.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Dec;208:107783. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107783. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107783
PMID:39288452
Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) offer a range of substantial safety and mobility benefits. However, successful deployment of AVs will involve interacting with other road users, such as pedestrians and other human-driven vehicles. While previous research has focused on factors that influence perceptions of AVs, less work has addressed how specific interactions with other road users influence acceptability from multiple perspectives. Accordingly, we conducted six studies examining how vehicles, either human-driven or autonomous, should behave at a zebra crossing in terms of stopping distance from the crossing, how long a vehicle should wait before setting off, and the influence of traffic context. Using computer-generated videos we found that: the optimal stopping distance was just before the stop line; participants were generally accepting of a vehicle that waited until a pedestrian had fully cleared the crossing before setting off, and sometime earlier; the presence of other vehicles, context and observer viewpoint can affect judgements of vehicle behaviour; autonomous vehicles were judged more harshly than human drivers with learner drivers judged less harshly in some circumstances, and that vehicle size appeared to have little influence over the acceptability of vehicle behaviours. The results are important for informing the design of autonomous vehicle manoeuvres from the viewpoints of vehicle occupants and other road users.

摘要

自动驾驶汽车(AV)提供了一系列实质性的安全和机动性优势。然而,要成功部署自动驾驶汽车,就必须与其他道路使用者(如行人和其他人力驾驶车辆)进行交互。虽然之前的研究重点是影响对自动驾驶汽车的看法的因素,但很少有研究涉及与其他道路使用者的具体交互如何从多个角度影响可接受性。因此,我们进行了六项研究,探讨了在斑马线上,无论是人力驾驶还是自动驾驶的车辆,在停车距离、等待时间以及交通环境等方面应该如何表现。我们使用计算机生成的视频发现:最佳停车距离就在停车线前;参与者普遍接受车辆在行人完全穿过路口后再出发的做法,而且有时更早出发也可以接受;其他车辆的存在、环境和观察者视角会影响对车辆行为的判断;自动驾驶汽车比人力驾驶汽车受到更严厉的评判,而在某些情况下,学习驾驶的司机受到的评判则不那么严厉,而且车辆大小似乎对车辆行为的可接受性影响不大。这些结果对于从车辆乘员和其他道路使用者的角度为自动驾驶汽车的操纵设计提供了重要信息。

相似文献

1
How should human-driven and autonomous vehicles behave at a zebra crossing? Determining acceptable stopping distances and setting-off times.在斑马线上,有人驾驶和自动驾驶车辆应该如何行驶?确定可接受的停车距离和出发时间。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Dec;208:107783. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107783. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.决定何时在自动驾驶车前穿行:儿童和成人行人对 eHMI 计时和车辆运动学的反应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jul;202:107567. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107567. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.人类驾驶车辆如何在互动环境中避开行人?一项自然驾驶研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 16;22(20):7860. doi: 10.3390/s22207860.
4
Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.行人为配备 eHMI 的自动驾驶车辆在分隔和混合交通条件下的过街行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107115. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107115. Epub 2023 May 18.
5
A game-theoretic approach for modelling pedestrian-vehicle conflict resolutions in uncontrolled traffic environments.一种用于在无控制交通环境中建模行人和车辆冲突解决方案的博弈论方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107604. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107604. Epub 2024 May 10.
6
What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space?当与共享空间中的全自动道路运输系统交互时,VRU 需要哪些外部呈现的信息?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
7
Sharing roads with automated vehicles: A questionnaire investigation from drivers', cyclists' and pedestrians' perspectives.与自动驾驶车辆共享道路:来自驾驶员、骑车者和行人视角的问卷调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107093. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107093. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.安全措施对驾驶员在行人横道处的速度行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
9
Who goes first? A distributed simulator study of vehicle-pedestrian interaction.谁先过?车辆-行人交互的分布式模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jun;186:107050. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107050. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
10
Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.年轻和年长的成年行人在传统汽车和自动驾驶汽车前过马路时的行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106256. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106256. Epub 2021 Jun 17.