Böhm Stefanie, Fingerle Volker, Beyerlein Andreas, Wildner Manfred, Böhmer Merle M
Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), 80636 Munich, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
National Reference Centre for Borrelia, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2025 Jan;16(1):102396. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102396. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease (TBD) in Germany. In Bavaria, the average annual incidence of reported cases was 34.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants between 2013 and 2020, although case numbers were presumed to be substantially higher. Since no vaccine against LB is currently available, prevention focuses on individual protection measures. This study aims to address knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among LB cases, a population group at increased exposure to ticks, tick bites and repeated infections. We invited Bavarian LB cases reported between weeks 23 and 35 in 2019 to participate in a questionnaire study. Questions included socio-demographic characteristics, experiences with TBDs, potential tick exposures, details of the recent episode of LB, and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours regarding TBDs and protection measures. Among the 377 participants, 300 were adults/adolescents, 77 were children (<14 years). Two third resided in rural areas. Although mostly well informed, a significant proportion of participants did not know or were misinformed about availability of repellents (48.5 %), risk of LB in their district (24.9 %), ticks not falling from trees (22.1 %) and non-availability of vaccination against LB (20.9 %). Even though a majority perceived checking for ticks after spending time outdoors, wearing long clothes, wearing closed shoes and tucking pants in socks as effective protection measures against tick bites, a much lower proportion applied those measures frequently (proportions perceived vs. applied: 99.2 % vs. 72.1%; 93.8 % vs. 40.2 %, 88.8 % vs. 51.1 % and 85.4 % vs. 16.8 %, respectively). Identified lack of knowledge or misconception regarding risk factors, availability of protection measures and tick behaviour may hamper application of recommended protection measures. There appeared to be a discrepancy between perceived effectiveness and frequency of application of protection measures. Addressing identified gaps in education campaigns, specifically targeting people living in rural areas, and utilising physician-patient interactions for education are promising entry points to increase awareness and prevent TBDs. Moreover, motivators and barriers for the application of preventive behaviour should be subject of future studies.
莱姆病(LB)是德国最常见的蜱传疾病(TBD)。在巴伐利亚州,2013年至2020年间报告病例的年平均发病率为每10万居民34.3例,不过实际病例数可能要高得多。由于目前尚无针对莱姆病的疫苗,预防工作重点在于个人防护措施。本研究旨在了解莱姆病患者(这一蜱虫暴露、蜱虫叮咬及反复感染风险增加的人群)的知识、态度和行为。我们邀请了2019年第23至35周期间报告的巴伐利亚州莱姆病患者参与一项问卷调查研究。问题包括社会人口学特征、蜱传疾病经历、潜在蜱虫暴露情况、近期莱姆病发作的细节,以及关于蜱传疾病和防护措施的知识、态度和行为。在377名参与者中,300人为成年人/青少年,77人为儿童(<14岁)。三分之二的人居住在农村地区。尽管大多数人了解情况,但仍有相当一部分参与者不知道或被错误告知驱虫剂的可用性(48.5%)、所在地区莱姆病的风险(24.9%)、蜱虫不会从树上掉落(22.1%)以及没有针对莱姆病的疫苗(20.9%)。尽管大多数人认为在户外活动后检查蜱虫、穿长袖衣服、穿封闭式鞋子以及把裤子塞进袜子里是预防蜱虫叮咬的有效措施,但经常采取这些措施的比例要低得多(认为有效与实际采取措施的比例分别为:99.2%对72.1%;93.8%对40.2%,88.8%对51.1%,85.4%对16.8%)。已发现的对风险因素、防护措施可用性以及蜱虫行为的知识缺乏或误解可能会妨碍推荐防护措施的应用。在防护措施的认知有效性和应用频率之间似乎存在差异。针对教育活动中已发现的差距,特别是针对农村地区居民,并利用医患互动进行教育,是提高认识和预防蜱传疾病的有希望的切入点。此外,预防行为应用的动机和障碍应成为未来研究的主题。