Bai Yaowei, Liu Jiacheng, Wu Wenlong, Zhou Binqian, Sun Bo, Yao Wei, Liu Xiaoming, Zhao Hu, Guo Yusheng, Jiang Xin, Liang Bin, Yang Lian, Zheng Chuansheng
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China.
Department of Ultrasound, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tong ji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Dec;181:111740. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111740. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
The consensus on whether Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) should be combined with variceal embolization in the treatment of portal hypertension-induced bleeding has not yet been reached. This study aimed to compare the difference in rebleeding incidence between TIPS and TIPS combined with variceal embolization and to analyze the optimal population for variceal embolization.
Clinical data of 721 patients undergoing TIPS were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups: TIPS alone (n = 155) and TIPS with embolization (TIPS+E, n = 251). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to analyze prognostic differences between the two groups, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (PPG) exceeding 12 mmHg.
After TIPS placement, the mean PPG significantly decreased for all patients. A total of 51 patients (12.6 %) experienced rebleeding, with 24 cases (15.9 %) in the TIPS group and 27 cases (10.6 %) in the TIPS+E group. There was no significant difference in cumulative rebleeding incidence between the TIPS+E and TIPS groups. In the subgroup with post-TIPS PPG greater than 12 mmHg, the cumulative rebleeding incidence was significantly lower in the TIPS+E group compared to the TIPS group (HR = 0.47, 95 %CI = 0.24-0.93, Log rank P = 0.026). No significant difference was found in patients with a post-TIPS PPG less than 12 mmHg.
For patients with post-TIPS PPG exceeding 12 mmHg, simultaneous variceal embolization with TIPS placement significantly reduces the risk of rebleeding.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗门静脉高压症出血时是否应联合曲张静脉栓塞术尚未达成共识。本研究旨在比较TIPS与TIPS联合曲张静脉栓塞术再出血发生率的差异,并分析曲张静脉栓塞术的最佳适用人群。
回顾性收集721例行TIPS患者的临床资料。患者分为两组:单纯TIPS组(n = 155)和TIPS联合栓塞组(TIPS+E,n = 251)。采用Kaplan-Meier(KM)曲线分析两组预后差异,并根据TIPS后门静脉压力梯度(PPG)超过12 mmHg进行亚组分析。
TIPS术后,所有患者的平均PPG均显著降低。共有5 ...全文