• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泽布替尼与苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效果比较。

Cost-Effectiveness of Zanubrutinib Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.

College of Pharmacy, Shandong Medical College, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2024 Nov;46(11):877-882. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.016
PMID:39289059
Abstract

PURPOSE

Zanubrutinib, a potent and specific irreversible Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has proven to be effective in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), whether used alone or in combination with other therapies. Here, we compared the cost-effectiveness of zanubrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab (R-bendamustine) to determine its effectiveness as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients with untreated CLL.

METHODS

The evaluation utilized a partitioned survival model, constructed using TreeAge Pro 2011 software, incorporating data from SEQUOIA trial (NCT03336333). Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in trials using parametric survival modeling. In this analysis, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and lifetime cost were calculated from the Chinese health care system perspective. Sensitivity analyses, including 1-way analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were carried out to explore the uncertainty of the modeling results. Additionally, several scenario analyses, including different zanubrutinib price calculation and 20-year time horizon, were evaluated.

FINDINGS

The findings revealed that zanubrutinib had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $58,258.18 per additional QALYs gained compared with bendamustine-rituximab, with zanubrutinib being cost-effective only if its price was reduced by more than 30%. Research indicated that zanubrutinib achieved at least a 3.70% probability of cost-effectiveness at the threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressed disease.

IMPLICATIONS

The study highlighted the importance of considering the cost-effectiveness of zanubrutinib at its current price point for patients with untreated CLL in China, emphasizing the need for further assessment and potential pricing adjustments to enhance its economic viability in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

泽布替尼是一种有效的、特异性的、不可逆的布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,已被证明在未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中具有疗效,无论是单独使用还是与其他疗法联合使用。在这里,我们比较了泽布替尼与苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗(R-苯达莫司汀)的成本效益,以确定其作为未经治疗的中国 CLL 患者一线治疗的效果。

方法

本评估采用分区生存模型,使用 TreeAge Pro 2011 软件构建,纳入 SEQUOIA 试验(NCT03336333)的数据。使用参数生存模型从试验报告的生存概率中估计转移概率。在这项分析中,从中国医疗保健系统的角度计算了质量调整生命年(QALYs)、增量成本效果比和终生成本。进行了敏感性分析,包括单因素分析和概率敏感性分析,以探讨模型结果的不确定性。此外,还评估了几种情景分析,包括不同的泽布替尼价格计算和 20 年时间范围。

结果

结果表明,与苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗相比,泽布替尼每增加一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效果比为 58258.18 美元,只有当泽布替尼的价格降低 30%以上时,它才具有成本效益。研究表明,泽布替尼在 38223.34 美元/QALY 的阈值下至少有 3.70%的成本效果概率。单因素敏感性分析表明,结果对进展疾病的效用较为敏感。

结论

该研究强调了在中国,考虑到目前价格点的泽布替尼的成本效益对于未经治疗的 CLL 患者的重要性,需要进一步评估和潜在的定价调整,以提高其在临床实践中的经济可行性。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Zanubrutinib Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.泽布替尼与苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效果比较。
Clin Ther. 2024 Nov;46(11):877-882. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Health-related quality-of-life in treatment-naive CLL/SLL patients treated with zanubrutinib versus bendamustine plus rituximab.初治 CLL/SLL 患者采用泽布替尼与苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗治疗的健康相关生活质量。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Nov;39(11):1505-1511. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2262381. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
Zanubrutinib Versus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Median 5-Year Follow-Up of SEQUOIA.泽布替尼与苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗用于初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤患者:SEQUOIA研究的5年中位随访结果
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Mar;43(7):780-787. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-02265. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
4
Cost-effectiveness of BTK inhibitors vs bendamustine and rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的成本效益
Future Oncol. 2023 Dec;19(38):2525-2536. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0574. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
5
Generic ibrutinib a potential cost-effective strategy for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.通用型依鲁替尼是慢性淋巴细胞白血病一线治疗的一种潜在的具有成本效益的策略。
Ann Hematol. 2023 Nov;102(11):3125-3132. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05342-y. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
6
Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.泽布替尼与苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗治疗初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病和小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SEQUOIA):一项随机、对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Aug;23(8):1031-1043. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00293-5. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
7
A Prospective Economic Analysis of Early Outcome Data From the Alliance A041202/ CCTG CLC.2 Randomized Phase III Trial Of Bendamustine-Rituximab Compared With Ibrutinib-Based Regimens in Untreated Older Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.联盟 A041202/CCTG CLC.2 前瞻性经济分析:随机 III 期试验结果,比较苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗与伊布替尼方案治疗未经治疗的老年慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Nov;21(11):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
8
A Markov model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing zanubrutinib to ibrutinib for treating relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.基于马尔可夫模型的成本效益分析比较zanubrutinib 与 ibrutinib 治疗复发/难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Nov;24(9):1089-1096. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2288683. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
9
Number needed to treat and associated cost analysis of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.泽布替尼与伊布替尼治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病的需治疗人数及相关成本分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 May;31(5):482-490. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.24330. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
10
Cost-effectiveness of acalabrutinib monotherapy or with obinutuzumab versus chemoimmunotherapy for untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia in China.在中国,阿卡拉布替尼单药治疗或联合奥滨尤妥珠单抗与化学免疫疗法用于初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效益分析。
Ther Adv Hematol. 2024 Nov 8;15:20406207241295559. doi: 10.1177/20406207241295559. eCollection 2024.