• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证皮肤护理和水胶体敷料预防鼻胃管相关压力性损伤的效果:一项随机对照临床试验。

The effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric tube-related pressure injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Yeşilyurt Maide, Yüksel Serpil, Yosunkaya Alper

机构信息

Aksaray University, Health Services Vocational School, Aksaray, Turkey.

Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Nursing, Department of Surgical Nursing, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2024 Nov;33(4):889-894. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2024.09.001
PMID:39289093
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric (NG) tube-related pressure injuries (PIs).

DESIGN

This study was a three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04682925).

METHODS

The study was conducted with 102 patients who underwent NG tube insertion immediately after admission to the anesthesiology and reanimation intensive care unit of a university hospital in Turkey. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: a control arm (n = 34), a hydrocolloid dressing arm (n = 34), and a skin care arm (n = 34). Patients in the hydrocolloid dressing arm received daily application of hydrocolloid dressing to the nasal mucosa and alae nasi where the NG tube was inserted. Patients in the skin care arm received skin care interventions in preventing PIs twice daily. No interventions were administered to the control group.

RESULTS

No NG tube-related PIs occurred in any patients in the hydrocolloid dressing arm. However, PIs occurred in 97.1 % of patients in the control arm and 94.1 % of patients in the skin care arm. According to the results of regression analysis, failure to apply hydrocolloid dressing increased the risk of NG tube-related PIs by 20.3 times [OR = 20.301, 95 % CI = 6.335-65.053, p < 0.001]. Additionally, a one-unit increase in the duration of ventilation days reduced the risk of NG tube-related PIs by 17.7 % (1-0.823) [OR = 0.823 (95 % CI = 0.684-0.989), p = 0.038].

CONCLUSION

Results revealed that hydrocolloid dressing is effective in preventing of NG tube-related PIs, whereas skin care did not demonstrate the same effectiveness.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定循证皮肤护理和水胶体敷料在预防鼻胃管相关压力性损伤中的作用。

设计

本研究是一项三臂平行组随机对照临床试验,已在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04682925)上注册。

方法

该研究对土耳其一家大学医院麻醉与复苏重症监护病房入院后立即接受鼻胃管插入术的102例患者进行。患者被随机分为三组:对照组(n = 34)、水胶体敷料组(n = 34)和皮肤护理组(n = 34)。水胶体敷料组患者每天在插入鼻胃管的鼻黏膜和鼻翼处应用水胶体敷料。皮肤护理组患者每天接受两次预防压力性损伤的皮肤护理干预。对照组不进行任何干预。

结果

水胶体敷料组的任何患者均未发生鼻胃管相关压力性损伤。然而,对照组97.1%的患者和皮肤护理组94.1%的患者发生了压力性损伤。根据回归分析结果,未应用水胶体敷料使鼻胃管相关压力性损伤的风险增加了20.3倍[比值比(OR)= 20.301,95%置信区间(CI)= 6.335 - 65.053,p < 0.001]。此外,通气天数每增加1天,鼻胃管相关压力性损伤的风险降低17.7%(1 - 0.823)[OR = 0.823(95% CI = 0.684 - 0.989),p = 0.038]。

结论

结果显示,水胶体敷料在预防鼻胃管相关压力性损伤方面有效,而皮肤护理未显示出相同的效果。

相似文献

1
The effect of evidence-based skin care and hydrocolloid dressing in the prevention of nasogastric tube-related pressure injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial.循证皮肤护理和水胶体敷料预防鼻胃管相关压力性损伤的效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Tissue Viability. 2024 Nov;33(4):889-894. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Investigating the Efficacy of Hydrocolloid Dressing for Preventing Nasotracheal Tube-Related Pressure Injury in the PICU.研究水胶体敷料预防小儿重症监护病房经鼻气管插管相关性压力性损伤的效果。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;21(9):e752-e758. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002494.
3
[Preventing Facial Pressure Injuries in Patients Who Use Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilators: The Efficiency of Dressings].[预防使用无创正压通气患者面部压力性损伤:敷料的有效性]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2016 Oct;63(5):86-94. doi: 10.6224/JN.63.5.86.
4
Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.预防压疮的敷料和外用制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 6;12(12):CD009362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub3.
5
[A comparison of the efficacy of different wound dressing management techniques in preventing pressure ulcers].不同伤口敷料管理技术在预防压疮方面的疗效比较
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;60(4):65-75. doi: 10.6224/JN.60.3.65.
6
Hydrocellular Foam Versus Hydrocolloid Plate in the Prevention of Pressure Injuries.水细胞泡沫与水胶体敷料预防压力性损伤的比较
Wounds. 2019 Aug;31(8):193-199. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Effectiveness of using hydrocolloid dressing combined with 3M Cavilon No-Sting Barrier Film to prevent facial pressure injury on medical staff in a COVID-19 designated hospital in China: a self-controlled study.在中国的一家 COVID-19 定点医院中,使用水胶体敷料联合 3M Cavilon No-Sting 屏障膜预防医务人员面部压力性损伤的效果:一项自身对照研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):3-9. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1615. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers.用于治疗压疮的泡沫敷料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 12;10(10):CD011332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011332.pub2.
9
A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes.一项多中心、随机、临床试验,比较初级保健和养老院中 II 级压力性溃疡患者使用粘性聚氨酯泡沫敷料和粘性水胶体敷料的效果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Dec 21;14:196. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-196.
10
Evaluation of effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressing vs ceramide containing dressing against pressure ulcers.水胶体敷料与含神经酰胺敷料治疗压疮的效果评估。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(6):936-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.预防压疮的敷料和外用制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 3;12(12):CD009362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub4.