Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Sep;33(9):e5849. doi: 10.1002/pds.5849.
Following the mass recall of valsartan products with nitrosamine impurities in July 2018, the number of patients exposed to these products, the duration of exposure, and the potential for cancer remains unknown. Therefore, we assessed the extent and duration of use of valsartan products with a nitrosamine impurity in the United States, Canada, and Denmark.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative healthcare data from the US FDA Sentinel System, four Canadian provinces that contribute to the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients, 18 years and older between May 2012 and December 2020 with a valsartan dispensing were identified in each database. Patients were followed from the date of valsartan dispensing until discontinuation. We defined four valsartan exposure categories based on nitrosamine impurity status; recalled generic products with confirmed NDMA/NDEA levels (recalled-tested); recalled generic products that were not tested (recalled); non-recalled generic and non-recalled branded products. In Denmark, the recalled-tested category was not included due to absence of testing data. The proportion and duration of use of valsartan episodes stratified by nitrosamine-impurity status was calculated.
We identified 3.3 and 2.8 million (United States) and 51.3 and 229 thousand (Canada) recalled-tested and recalled valsartan exposures. In Denmark, where valsartan exposure was generally low, there were 10 747 recalled exposures. Immediately after the recall notices were issued, there was increased rates of switching to a non-valsartan ARB. The mean duration of use of the recalled-tested products was 167 (±223.1) and 146 (±255.8) days in the United States and Canada respectively. For the recalled products, mean cumulative duration of use was 178 (±249.6), 269 (±397.3) and 166 (±251.0) days in the United States, Canada, and Denmark, respectively.
In this cohort study, despite widespread use of recalled generic valsartan between 2012 and 2018, the duration of use was relatively short and probably did not pose an elevated risk of nitrosamine-induced cancer. However, since products with nitrosamine impurity could have been on the market over a 6-year period, patients exposed to these products for longer durations could have a potentially different risk of cancer.
2018 年 7 月缬沙坦产品因含有亚硝胺杂质被大规模召回后,暴露于这些产品的患者数量、暴露时间以及致癌的潜在风险仍不得而知。因此,我们评估了美国、加拿大和丹麦含有亚硝胺杂质的缬沙坦产品的使用范围和时长。
我们在美国 FDA 监测系统、四个参与加拿大观察性药物效应研究网络(CNODES)的加拿大省份以及丹麦国家处方登记处使用行政医疗保健数据进行了回顾性队列研究。每个数据库中均识别出了 2012 年 5 月至 2020 年 12 月期间 18 岁及以上接受缬沙坦配药的患者。患者从接受缬沙坦配药之日起开始随访,直至停药。我们根据亚硝胺杂质状况将缬沙坦暴露分为四个类别:含有已确认 NDMA/NDEA 水平的召回测试通用产品(召回测试);未经测试的召回通用产品(召回);非召回通用和非召回品牌产品。由于缺乏测试数据,丹麦未包括召回测试类别。按亚硝胺杂质状态分层计算缬沙坦发作的比例和时长。
在美国和加拿大分别确定了 330 万和 280 万例(美国)和 51.3 万和 22.9 万例(加拿大)的召回测试和召回缬沙坦暴露。在丹麦,由于缬沙坦的暴露通常较低,因此有 10747 例召回暴露。在召回通知发布后,立即有更多人转而使用非缬沙坦 ARB。召回测试产品的平均使用时长分别为 167(±223.1)和 146(±255.8)天,在美国和加拿大。对于召回产品,在美国、加拿大和丹麦的累计使用时间分别为 178(±249.6)、269(±397.3)和 166(±251.0)天。
在这项队列研究中,尽管在 2012 年至 2018 年间广泛使用了含有亚硝胺杂质的通用缬沙坦,但使用时间相对较短,可能不会增加亚硝胺引起癌症的风险。然而,由于含有亚硝胺杂质的产品可能已经在市场上存在了 6 年,因此暴露于这些产品的患者的潜在风险可能不同。