• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童膀胱结石治疗的腔内开放性膀胱切开取石术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Endourological open cystolithotomy for bladder stone management among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fauzan Randy, Herman Hendra, Rachman Wendy, Sitompul Ardiansyah Periadi, Astram Ari

机构信息

Urology Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Raden Mattaher Hospital, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Jambi, 36121, Indonesia.

Urology Division, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universitas Jambi, Abdul Manap Hospital, Jambi, Jambi, 36129, Indonesia.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2023 Feb 2;12:124. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129270.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.129270.1
PMID:39291145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406119/
Abstract

The treatment of choice for bladder stones in children remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of endourological and open cystolithotomy for the management of bladder stones in children. The Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trial databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant English-language publications from 1 to 30 August 2022. Stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, length of stay, and procedure duration were compared. Children (male and female) <18 years of age of any ethnicity with bladder stones (single/multiple) were included. Patients with a history of bladder augmentation or diversion were excluded. The quality of studies included was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Assessment. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. Five articles (436 participants) that compared endourological open cystolithotomy were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses. Four were non-randomised, retrospective, and single centre studies. While the other one was a randomised controlled trial. Measure outcome characteristics included SFR, complications, procedure duration, and length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the SFR between transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCL) ( 0.22). There were also no significant differences in complications (TUCL PCCL, 0.18; TUCL open cystolithotomy [CL] and PCCL CL, 0.08). PCCL featured a longer procedure duration than TUCL ( 0.00001), while CL was shorter than TUCL and PCCL (both 0.00001). Finally, in terms of length of stay, TUCL was superior to PCCL and CL, while PCCL was better than CL (all 0.00001). Endourological and open surgical management of bladder stones in children showed comparable SFR and fewer complications. Open surgery offers a shorter procedure duration than endourological management, but PCCL features a shorter procedure duration than TUCL. In terms of length of stay, TUCL and PCCL were superior to CL, while TUCL was better than PCCL.

摘要

儿童膀胱结石的首选治疗方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较腔内泌尿外科手术和开放性膀胱切开取石术治疗儿童膀胱结石的效果。检索了Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验数据库和clinicaltrials.gov,以查找2022年8月1日至30日期间相关的英文出版物。比较了结石清除率(SFR)、并发症发生率、住院时间和手术时长。纳入了年龄<18岁、任何种族、患有膀胱结石(单发/多发)的儿童(男童和女童)。排除有膀胱扩大或改道病史的患者。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估对纳入研究的质量进行评估。使用RevMan进行荟萃分析。五项比较腔内泌尿外科手术和开放性膀胱切开取石术的文章(436名参与者)纳入了定性和定量分析。四项为非随机、回顾性、单中心研究。另一项为随机对照试验。测量的结果特征包括结石清除率、并发症、手术时长和住院时间。经尿道膀胱碎石术(TUCL)和经皮膀胱碎石术(PCCL)之间的结石清除率无显著差异(0.22)。并发症方面也无显著差异(TUCL与PCCL,0.18;TUCL与开放性膀胱切开取石术[CL]以及PCCL与CL,0.08)。PCCL的手术时长比TUCL长(0.00001),而CL比TUCL和PCCL短(均为0.00001)。最后,在住院时间方面,TUCL优于PCCL和CL,而PCCL优于CL(均为0.00001)。儿童膀胱结石的腔内泌尿外科手术和开放手术治疗显示出相当的结石清除率且并发症较少。开放手术的手术时长比腔内泌尿外科手术短,但PCCL的手术时长比TUCL短。在住院时间方面,TUCL和PCCL优于CL,而TUCL优于PCCL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/efe02a8f3eb4/f1000research-12-141941-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/9d83c507ac35/f1000research-12-141941-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/0570e27e12d8/f1000research-12-141941-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/41ecf43315a7/f1000research-12-141941-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/2f4e5ead4f0d/f1000research-12-141941-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/9f0f491eb3eb/f1000research-12-141941-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/f22ea9ea22d6/f1000research-12-141941-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/50531a477366/f1000research-12-141941-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/2dc8219b4231/f1000research-12-141941-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/135bc5d19c01/f1000research-12-141941-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/1d91d9b773e0/f1000research-12-141941-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/df21d5ea4cfd/f1000research-12-141941-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/efe02a8f3eb4/f1000research-12-141941-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/9d83c507ac35/f1000research-12-141941-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/0570e27e12d8/f1000research-12-141941-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/41ecf43315a7/f1000research-12-141941-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/2f4e5ead4f0d/f1000research-12-141941-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/9f0f491eb3eb/f1000research-12-141941-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/f22ea9ea22d6/f1000research-12-141941-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/50531a477366/f1000research-12-141941-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/2dc8219b4231/f1000research-12-141941-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/135bc5d19c01/f1000research-12-141941-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/1d91d9b773e0/f1000research-12-141941-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/df21d5ea4cfd/f1000research-12-141941-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/11406119/efe02a8f3eb4/f1000research-12-141941-g0011.jpg

相似文献

1
Endourological open cystolithotomy for bladder stone management among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童膀胱结石治疗的腔内开放性膀胱切开取石术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
F1000Res. 2023 Feb 2;12:124. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129270.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Treatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel.成人和儿童膀胱结石的治疗:代表欧洲泌尿外科学会结石病指南小组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):352-367. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
3
Treatment outcomes of bladder stones in children with intact bladders in developing countries: A systematic review of >1000 cases on behalf of the European Association of Urology Bladder Stones Guideline panel.发展中国家未行膀胱造瘘术的儿童膀胱结石的治疗结局:代表欧洲泌尿外科学会膀胱结石指南小组对>1000 例病例的系统评价。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Apr;18(2):132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
4
Endemic Bladder Stone Disease in Children, Pattern And Current Management: Experience From A Centre In Peri-Urban Setting In Pakistan.儿童地方性膀胱结石病的发病模式和当前治疗方法:来自巴基斯坦城郊中心的经验。
Urol J. 2024 Oct 12;21(5):325-330. doi: 10.22037/uj.v21i.8046.
5
Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children.比较两种不同的微创技术在学龄前儿童膀胱结石手术中的应用。
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;52(4):1274-1280. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5433. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Percutaneous versus transurethral cystolithotripsy.经皮与经尿道膀胱结石碎石术
J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):237-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0455.
7
Minimally Invasive Management of Bladder Stones in Children.儿童膀胱结石的微创治疗
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jan 26;8:618756. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.618756. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparison of three different modalities for the treatment of bladder calculi by size.比较三种不同方式治疗不同大小膀胱结石的疗效。
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):413-417. doi: 10.1177/03915603211020469. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Percutaneous versus transurethral cystolithotripsy and TURP for large prostates and large vesical calculi: refinement of technique and updated data.经皮与经尿道膀胱结石碎石术及经尿道前列腺电切术治疗大前列腺和大膀胱结石:技术改进与最新数据
Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(1):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-005-0247-8.
10
Comparison of endourological and open cystolithotomy in the management of bladder stones in children.小儿膀胱结石治疗中腔内泌尿外科手术与开放性膀胱切开取石术的比较。
J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2684-7; discussion 2687-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.040. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomised trial comparing transurethral to percutaneous cystolithotripsy in boys.经尿道与经皮膀胱结石碎石术治疗男孩膀胱结石的随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2022 Aug;130(2):254-261. doi: 10.1111/bju.15693. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Comparison of nephroscopy and cystoscopy used in the treatment of bladder stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮肾镜与膀胱镜治疗膀胱结石的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Dec 31;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01461-3.
3
Comparison of three different modalities for the treatment of bladder calculi by size.
比较三种不同方式治疗不同大小膀胱结石的疗效。
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):413-417. doi: 10.1177/03915603211020469. Epub 2021 May 31.
4
Mini-percutaneous cystolithotripsy (mPCCL) versus transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUC) in pre-school children: Prospective comparative non-randomized outcomes over 8 years.学龄前儿童经皮微造瘘膀胱结石碎石术(mPCCL)与经尿道膀胱结石碎石术(TUC)的比较:8年的前瞻性非随机对照研究结果
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Dec;16(6):782.e1-782.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.09.021. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Bladder stone following intravesical migration of surgical clip five years after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后五年,手术夹膀胱内迁移后出现膀胱结石。
Urol Case Rep. 2019 Oct 25;28:101060. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2019.101060. eCollection 2020 Jan.
6
Surgical Management of Vesical Stones in Children: A Comparison Between Open Cystolithotomy, Percutaneous Cystolithotomy and Transurethral Cystolithotripsy With Holmium-YAG Laser.儿童膀胱结石的手术治疗:开放性膀胱切开取石术、经皮膀胱取石术与钬激光经尿道膀胱结石碎石术的比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Summer;9(3):183-187. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.33. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
7
Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia with vesical calculi - A single-centre experience.经尿道前列腺电切联合膀胱镜下气压弹道碎石治疗良性前列腺增生合并膀胱结石——单中心经验
Arab J Urol. 2018 Jun 11;16(4):417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.004. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review.患者、干预措施、对照、结局(PICO)作为一种检索策略工具对文献检索质量的影响:一项系统评价。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):420-431. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.345. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
Endoscopic intact removal of medium-size- or multiple bladder stones with the use of transvesical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.经膀胱腹腔镜单部位手术完整切除中等大小或多发膀胱结石。
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):373-378. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2358-8. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Surgical management of bladder stones: literature review.膀胱结石的外科治疗:文献综述
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013 May-Jun;40(3):227-33. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912013000300011.