• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BE FAST 与 FAST:比较两种记忆技巧对中风症状保留的随机先导试验。

BE FAST Versus FAST: A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Retention of Stroke Symptoms Between 2 Mnemonics.

机构信息

Corpus Christi Medical Center Corpus Christi TX USA.

Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Aurora BayCare Medical Center, Advocate Health Green Bay WI USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e035696. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.035696. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.035696
PMID:39291473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11681435/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Balance, Eye, Face, Arm, Speech, Time (BE FAST) was proposed to increase the public's ability to recognize more signs of stroke by adding balance (B) and eyesight changes (E) to the stroke acronym FAST (Face, Arm, Speech, Time). Previous prospective studies suggested these additions did not result in increased stroke detection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A randomized, assessor blinded prospective pilot study assessed retention of BE FAST and FAST. The 174 participants were randomized to 1 of 2 education arms, educated similarly visually and auditorily, and retention was tested at 3 time points. Mnemonic recall was similar at 30 days (79.5% versus 69.8%, =0.104). Significantly lower retention was seen in the BE FAST group's ability to recall all symptoms at 3 to 5 minutes (75% versus 30.2%, <0.001), 60 minutes (70.5% versus 41.9%, <0.001), and 30 days (51.1% versus 24.4%, <0.001). Significantly higher retention was observed in the FAST group for partial recall at 3 to 5 minutes (94.3% versus 84.9%, =0.041), 60 minutes (86.4% versus 77.9%, =0.045), and 30 days (76.1% versus 59.3%, =0.012). For BE FAST, retention of more common symptoms at 30 days was lower for face (78.4% versus 60.5%, =0.010), speech (65.9% versus 47.7%, =0.015), and arm (63.6% versus 52.3%, =0.131).

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher retention and ability to recall stroke symptoms, fully or partially, was found with FAST. Adding B and E to FAST resulted in lower retention of more common symptoms.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06152016.

摘要

背景

平衡、眼睛、面部、手臂、言语、时间(BE FAST)是通过在 FAST(面部、手臂、言语、时间)中风首字母缩写词中添加平衡(B)和视力变化(E)来增加公众识别更多中风迹象的能力。先前的前瞻性研究表明,这些添加并没有导致中风检测率的提高。

方法和结果

一项随机、评估者盲法前瞻性试点研究评估了 BE FAST 和 FAST 的保留情况。174 名参与者被随机分配到 2 个教育组中的 1 个,以相同的视觉和听觉方式接受教育,并在 3 个时间点进行保留测试。30 天时的记忆术回忆相似(79.5%对 69.8%,=0.104)。在 3 至 5 分钟(75%对 30.2%,<0.001)、60 分钟(70.5%对 41.9%,<0.001)和 30 天(51.1%对 24.4%,<0.001)时,BE FAST 组回忆所有症状的能力明显较低。在 FAST 组中,3 至 5 分钟(94.3%对 84.9%,=0.041)、60 分钟(86.4%对 77.9%,=0.045)和 30 天(76.1%对 59.3%,=0.012)时部分回忆的保留率更高。对于 BE FAST,30 天时更常见症状的保留率更低:面部(78.4%对 60.5%,=0.010)、言语(65.9%对 47.7%,=0.015)和手臂(63.6%对 52.3%,=0.131)。

结论

FAST 可显著提高和保留对中风症状的记忆,无论是完全还是部分记忆。在 FAST 中添加 B 和 E 会导致更常见症状的保留率降低。

登记

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT06152016。

相似文献

1
BE FAST Versus FAST: A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Retention of Stroke Symptoms Between 2 Mnemonics.BE FAST 与 FAST:比较两种记忆技巧对中风症状保留的随机先导试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e035696. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.035696. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Stroke 120 or FAST (Face, Arm, Speech, Time): Which is Better in Stroke Awareness Promotion for Older Residents Living in Shanghai?脑卒中 120 或 FAST(面、臂、言语、时间):哪个更适合在上海居住的老年居民中提高脑卒中意识?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jul;31(7):106490. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106490. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
BE-FAST (Balance, Eyes, Face, Arm, Speech, Time): Reducing the Proportion of Strokes Missed Using the FAST Mnemonic.BE-FAST(平衡、眼睛、面部、手臂、言语、时间):减少使用FAST记忆法漏诊的中风比例。
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):479-481. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015169. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Personalized Video-Based Educational Platform to Improve Stroke Knowledge: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于个性化视频的脑卒中知识教育平台:一项随机临床试验
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 6;13(15):e035176. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035176. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Effect of an Educational Intervention for Primary Stroke Risk Reduction in Ghana and Nigeria: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.加纳和尼日利亚初级卒中风险降低教育干预的效果: 试点随机对照试验。
Stroke. 2023 Jun;54(6):1660-1664. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042618. Epub 2023 May 4.
6
Prognostic Value of BEFAST vs. FAST to Identify Stroke in a Prehospital Setting.在院前环境中,BEFAST与FAST用于识别中风的预后价值比较
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1490837. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Comparison of FAST and Stroke-112: A randomized study in Taiwan.FAST与Stroke-112的比较:台湾的一项随机研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Jan;121(1 Pt 1):187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
8
Speech Therapy Combined With Cerebrolysin in Enhancing Nonfluent Aphasia Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: ESCAS Randomized Pilot Study.言语治疗联合脑蛋白水解物促进急性缺血性卒中后非流利性失语恢复:ESCAS随机对照试验。
Stroke. 2025 Apr;56(4):937-947. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049834. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Combination Antithrombotic Therapy for Reduction of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.联合抗栓治疗降低颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病复发性缺血性卒中的发生率
Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):380-389. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047715. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A pilot comparison of the retention rates of FAST and BEFAST stroke warning-sign mnemonics.FAST和BEFAST中风预警信号记忆法留存率的初步比较。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1624800. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1624800. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of bilingual face, arm, speech, time (FAST) public awareness campaigns on emergency medical services (EMS) activation in a large Canadian metropolitan area.双语脸、臂、言语、时间(FAST)公众意识宣传活动对加拿大一个大型都市地区紧急医疗服务(EMS)启动的影响。
CJEM. 2023 May;25(5):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00482-6. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing FAST and BEFAST in Acute Stroke Patients.一项比较急性卒中患者中FAST和BEFAST的系统评价与Meta分析。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jan 28;12:765069. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.765069. eCollection 2021.
3
The Impact of Stroke Public Awareness Campaigns Differs Between Sociodemographic Groups.卒中公众宣传活动在不同社会人口群体之间的影响存在差异。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;49(2):231-238. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2021.76. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
BE-FAST: A Sensitive Screening Tool to Identify In-Hospital Acute Ischemic Stroke.BE-FAST:一种用于识别住院急性缺血性脑卒中的敏感筛查工具。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jul;29(7):104821. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104821. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Time Trends in Survival Following First Hemorrhagic or Ischemic Stroke Between 1991 and 2015 in the Rotterdam Study.1991 年至 2015 年间,鹿特丹研究中首次出血性或缺血性卒中后的生存时间趋势。
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):STROKEAHA119027198. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027198. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Impact of the national public 'FAST' campaigns.国家公共“FAST”运动的影响。
N Z Med J. 2019 Dec 13;132(1507):48-56.
7
Prognostic Value of BEFAST vs. FAST to Identify Stroke in a Prehospital Setting.在院前环境中,BEFAST与FAST用于识别中风的预后价值比较
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1490837. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
Impact of the Act FAST stroke campaign delivered by student pharmacists on the primary prevention of stroke.学生药剂师开展的“FAST 行动中风防治运动”对中风一级预防的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):326-332.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
BE-FAST (Balance, Eyes, Face, Arm, Speech, Time): Reducing the Proportion of Strokes Missed Using the FAST Mnemonic.BE-FAST(平衡、眼睛、面部、手臂、言语、时间):减少使用FAST记忆法漏诊的中风比例。
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):479-481. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015169. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Comparison of stroke recognition and stroke severity scores for stroke detection in a single cohort.单队列中用于卒中检测的卒中识别和卒中严重程度评分比较。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;86(9):1021-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309260. Epub 2014 Dec 2.