Suppr超能文献

格林-巴利综合征临床和电生理诊断标准的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Correlation of Clinical and Electrophysiological Criteria in the Diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Resident, Department of Neurology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Corresponding Author.

Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Sep;72(9):e14-e18. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0691.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are many criteria for diagnosing Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and the yield of these diagnostic criteria varies. Each criterion requires some laboratory data and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Although supportive laboratory data are reassuring when present in suspected cases of GBS, when absent, they can potentially cause further delay in diagnosis and treatment. There is no gold standard test for the diagnosis of GBS, and there are multiple diagnostic criteria for GBS to date. The aim of the study is to know the sensitivity of different criteria, clinical and electrophysiological, for the diagnosis of GBS and to study the clinical spectrum and electrophysiological spectrum of GBS in our cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied a total of 43 cases who presented with one or more of the following symptoms: relatively symmetrical and progressive flail-type weakness of more than one limb, with or without ataxia and/or ophthalmoplegia, and were diagnosed with GBS according to clinical criteria at the time of admission to Government Stanley Medical College Hospital. GBS mimics were ruled out. In all patients, the demographic data, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis (if done), and electrophysiological findings fitting into the diagnostic criteria of National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Dutch, and Brighton criteria were recorded. The need for assisted mechanical ventilation, neurology intensive care unit (NICU) stay, any complications, and treatment outcome details were recorded in a structured proforma.

RESULTS

Most of the patients in our study were in their fourth decade of life, with a mean age of 41.37 years, similar to previous studies from India. Men are more frequently affected compared to women, similar to what has been observed in most studies done previously worldwide. In our study, electrophysiological criteria by Dutch criteria (87.5%), Brighton criteria (87.5%), and NINDS criteria (85.6%) had low sensitivity compared to the clinical criteria.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, electrophysiological criteria proposed by the NINDS, Dutch, and Brighton criteria are less sensitive compared to clinical criteria in diagnosing GBS at early stages. Clinical criteria alone may be useful in resource-poor countries and at peripheral healthcare systems where NCS are not always readily available.

摘要

简介

诊断格林-巴利综合征(GBS)有许多标准,这些标准的检出率各不相同。每个标准都需要一些实验室数据和神经传导研究(NCS)。虽然在疑似 GBS 病例中出现支持性实验室数据时令人安心,但当这些数据缺失时,可能会进一步延误诊断和治疗。目前还没有用于诊断 GBS 的金标准测试,而且迄今为止已经有多种 GBS 诊断标准。本研究的目的是了解不同标准(临床和电生理)对 GBS 的诊断敏感性,并研究我们的患者队列中 GBS 的临床谱和电生理谱。

材料和方法

我们共研究了 43 例患者,这些患者表现为以下一种或多种症状:四肢无力呈非对称性进展性弛缓性瘫痪,伴或不伴共济失调和/或眼肌瘫痪,并且根据入院时政府斯坦利医学院医院的临床标准诊断为 GBS。排除 GBS 类似物。在所有患者中,记录了人口统计学数据、脑脊液(CSF)分析(如果进行)以及符合国家神经病学与卒中研究所(NINDS)、荷兰和布赖顿标准的电生理发现。记录了需要辅助机械通气、神经重症监护病房(NICU)入住、任何并发症以及治疗结果的详细信息。

结果

我们的研究中大多数患者处于第四个十年,平均年龄为 41.37 岁,与印度以前的研究相似。男性比女性更容易受影响,与以前全球大多数研究观察到的情况相似。在我们的研究中,荷兰标准(87.5%)、布赖顿标准(87.5%)和 NINDS 标准(85.6%)的电生理标准与临床标准相比敏感性较低。

结论

在本研究中,与临床标准相比,NINDS、荷兰和布赖顿标准提出的电生理标准在早期诊断 GBS 时敏感性较低。在资源匮乏的国家和在神经传导研究并不总是容易获得的外围医疗保健系统中,仅使用临床标准可能会更有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验