Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Terapéutica Médico Quirúrgica, Badajoz, España.
Universidad de Sevilla, Instituto de Biomedicina (IBiS) de Sevilla, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Sevilla, España.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Sep 16;32:e20240109. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0109. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the effect of the addition of dynamic cervical electrical stimulation (electro-massage, ES) to manual therapy (MT), compared to MT by itself, in individuals with myofascial temporomandibular pain.
A total of 46 participants with bilateral myofascial temporomandibular pain for at least three months were distributed into two groups. Group 1 (n=21) received local MT consisting of soft tissue mobilization and release techniques over the neck and temporomandibular regions. Group 2 (n=25) received an ES procedure in the cervical region combined with the same intervention as group 1. All participants underwent a 2-week protocol. The primary outcomes were pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the masseter and upper trapezius muscles (algometer), and pain-free vertical mouth opening (manual gauge). The secondary outcome was active cervical range-of-movement. Measurements were taken at baseline, immediately after intervention, and at a 4-week follow-up.
The ANOVA revealed significant changes over group*time, with better results for group 2 (large effect sizes) regarding pain intensity (p< 0.001; η2>0.14), pressure pain sensitivity and mouth opening (p<0.001; η2>0.14). Similar findings were observed for active cervical range-of-movement in all directions (p<0.001; η2>0.14), except rotation (p≥0.05).
Electrical stimulation therapy over the cervical region combined with a MT protocol over the neck and temporomandibular joint shows better clinical benefits than MT by itself in subjects with myofascial temporomandibular pain. Registration code: NCT04098952.
评估在患有肌筋膜颞下颌疼痛的个体中,与单独进行手动治疗(MT)相比,添加动态颈椎电刺激(电按摩,ES)对 MT 的影响。
共有 46 名双侧肌筋膜颞下颌疼痛至少持续三个月的参与者被分配到两组。组 1(n=21)接受局部 MT,包括颈部和颞下颌区域的软组织动员和松解技术。组 2(n=25)接受颈椎区域的 ES 程序,同时进行与组 1 相同的干预。所有参与者均接受为期 2 周的方案。主要结局是疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)、咀嚼肌和上斜方肌的压痛阈值(压力计)和无痛垂直张口度(手动量规)。次要结局是主动颈椎活动范围。在基线、干预后立即和 4 周随访时进行测量。
方差分析显示组*时间存在显著变化,组 2 的疼痛强度(p<0.001;η2>0.14)、压痛敏感性和张口度(p<0.001;η2>0.14)的结果更好(大效应量)。在所有方向的主动颈椎活动范围(p<0.001;η2>0.14)中观察到类似的发现,除了旋转(p≥0.05)。
颈椎区域的电刺激疗法结合颈部和颞下颌关节的 MT 方案在肌筋膜颞下颌疼痛患者中比单独进行 MT 具有更好的临床疗效。注册号:NCT04098952。