Suppr超能文献

两种非侵入性神经刺激方法对颞下颌关节紊乱症所致肌筋膜疼痛的治疗效果

Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders.

作者信息

Jha Awanindra K, Gupta Sweta, Sinha Abhishek, Tanna Medha, Priya Leena, Singh Shailee, Gore Navmi R

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Ranchi, IND.

Departmental of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42584. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42584. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background A range of diseases affecting the jaw muscles and/or temporomandibular joint are referred to as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Nearly 80% of the general population is affected by TMDs, and 48% of those people have trouble opening their mouths and have painful muscles. Aim To compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and microcurrent nerve stimulation (MENS) for the relief of masticatory muscle discomfort. Methods Groups I and II were further separated into two groups of 30 persons each (A and B), as well as subgroups C and D. Subjects in Group I received TENS treatment for 20 minutes at frequencies of 0-5 and 5-5 for subgroups A and B, and with visual analog scale (VAS) scores of 1-5 and 6-10 for subgroups C and D, respectively. Subjects in Group II received MENS for 20 minutes, with subgroups C and D receiving the same frequency and VAS score as subgroups A and B, respectively. All individuals underwent treatment with a comparable frequency and length of time every day for five days. Results For subgroup D treated with MENS, there was a considerable reduction in pain; however, for subgroups A and C, there was a comparable reduction in the VAS score for both groups treated with MENS and TENS therapy. Conclusion Compared to TENS, MENS provides quicker and more effective pain relief. Paresthesia and tingling are two adverse effects of TENS that are not present with MENS. However, MENS and TENS are equally helpful at treating masticatory muscle discomfort that is both acute and chronic, as well as improving mouth opening.

摘要

背景

一系列影响颌面部肌肉和/或颞下颌关节的疾病被称为颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)。近80%的普通人群受到TMDs的影响,其中48%的人张口困难且肌肉疼痛。目的:比较经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和微电流神经刺激疗法(MENS)缓解咀嚼肌不适的效果。方法:第一组和第二组又各自分为两组,每组30人(A组和B组),以及C亚组和D亚组。第一组的受试者接受TENS治疗20分钟,A亚组和B亚组的频率分别为0 - 5和5 - 5,C亚组和D亚组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)分别为1 - 5和6 - 10。第二组的受试者接受MENS治疗20分钟,C亚组和D亚组分别与A亚组和B亚组接受相同的频率和VAS评分。所有个体每天以相当的频率和时长接受治疗,持续五天。结果:接受MENS治疗的D亚组疼痛明显减轻;然而,对于A亚组和C亚组,接受MENS和TENS治疗的两组VAS评分均有类似程度的降低。结论:与TENS相比,MENS能更快、更有效地缓解疼痛。TENS有感觉异常和刺痛这两种不良反应,而MENS没有。然而,MENS和TENS在治疗急慢性咀嚼肌不适以及改善张口方面同样有效。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验