• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders.两种非侵入性神经刺激方法对颞下颌关节紊乱症所致肌筋膜疼痛的治疗效果
Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42584. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42584. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study.经皮神经电刺激(TENS)与微电流神经刺激(MENS)治疗咀嚼肌疼痛的比较:一项对照研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2019 Nov 23;2019:8291624. doi: 10.1155/2019/8291624. eCollection 2019.
3
The efficacy of microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation in treating masticatory myofascial pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微电流神经电刺激治疗咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cranio. 2024 Sep;42(5):555-561. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.2020006. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation in bruxism associated with masticatory muscle pain--a comparative study.经皮电刺激神经疗法和微电流电刺激神经疗法在与咀嚼肌疼痛相关的磨牙症中的有效性——一项对比研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):104-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.62816.
5
Evaluation of Efficacy of Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Subjects with Myositis and Myofascial Pain.超声检查在评估肌炎和肌筋膜疼痛患者经皮电神经刺激疗效中的应用
Korean J Pain. 2016 Jan;29(1):12-7. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.12. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Immediate Effect of Masticatory Muscle Activity with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Muscle Pain of Temporomandibular Disorders Patients.经皮电神经刺激咀嚼肌活动对颞下颌关节紊乱症患者肌肉疼痛的即时影响。
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 16;9(10):3330. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103330.
7
Ultra-Low Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain Modulation in a Rat Model with Myogenous Temporomandibular Dysfunction.肌源性颞下颌功能紊乱大鼠模型中经皮超低频电神经刺激对疼痛调节的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 14;22(18):9906. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189906.
8
Evaluation of microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation (MENS) effectiveness on muscle pain in temporomandibular disorders patients.微电流电神经刺激(MENS)对颞下颌关节紊乱症患者肌肉疼痛的疗效评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Jan;14(1):61-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000100012.
9
Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in symptomatic Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomised Control Trial.低水平激光治疗与经皮电神经刺激治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病症状的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Nov;50(11):1185-1193. doi: 10.1111/joor.13555. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
10
Comparative effectiveness of Low Level Laser therapy and Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.低强度激光疗法与经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的疗效比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Summer;8(Suppl 1):S27-S31. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.s6. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the therapeutic efficacy of microcurrent therapy: a narrative review.微电流疗法的治疗效果研究:一项叙述性综述
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Aug 15;16:20406223251361677. doi: 10.1177/20406223251361677. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of adding electro-massage to manual therapy for the treatment of individuals with myofascial temporomandibular pain: a randomized controlled trial.电按摩联合手法治疗肌筋膜性颞下颌疼痛的随机对照试验
J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Sep 16;32:e20240109. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0109. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A prospective, randomized-controlled study.脉冲电磁场疗法对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者疼痛、功能状态及生活质量的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May 18;66(2):140-146. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5169. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Comparison of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Microcurrent Nerve Stimulation (MENS) in the Management of Masticatory Muscle Pain: A Comparative Study.经皮神经电刺激(TENS)与微电流神经刺激(MENS)治疗咀嚼肌疼痛的比较:一项对照研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2019 Nov 23;2019:8291624. doi: 10.1155/2019/8291624. eCollection 2019.
3
The treatment modalities of masticatory muscle pain a network meta-analysis.咀嚼肌疼痛的治疗方式:一项网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017934.
4
Management of temporomandibular disorders with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: A systematic review.经皮电神经刺激治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的系统评价。
Cranio. 2022 May;40(3):217-228. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1687986. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Therapy on the Upper Trapezius in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study.经皮电神经刺激与干扰电疗法治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征中上斜方肌的疗效比较:一项随机对照研究
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;95(9):663-72. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000461.
6
Effectiveness of a home exercise program in combination with ultrasound therapy for temporomandibular joint disorders.家庭锻炼计划联合超声治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的有效性。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1847-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1847. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
7
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
8
The efficacy of frequency specific microcurrent therapy on delayed onset muscle soreness.频率特异性微电流疗法对延迟性肌肉酸痛的疗效。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
9
Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation in bruxism associated with masticatory muscle pain--a comparative study.经皮电刺激神经疗法和微电流电刺激神经疗法在与咀嚼肌疼痛相关的磨牙症中的有效性——一项对比研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):104-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.62816.
10
Pathophysiology of TMD pain--basic mechanisms and their implications for pharmacotherapy.颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛的病理生理学——基础机制及其对药物治疗的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 May;37(6):391-410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02074.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

两种非侵入性神经刺激方法对颞下颌关节紊乱症所致肌筋膜疼痛的治疗效果

Efficacy of Two Types of Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Myofascial Pain Caused by Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders.

作者信息

Jha Awanindra K, Gupta Sweta, Sinha Abhishek, Tanna Medha, Priya Leena, Singh Shailee, Gore Navmi R

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Ranchi, IND.

Departmental of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42584. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42584. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.42584
PMID:37637545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10460256/
Abstract

Background A range of diseases affecting the jaw muscles and/or temporomandibular joint are referred to as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Nearly 80% of the general population is affected by TMDs, and 48% of those people have trouble opening their mouths and have painful muscles. Aim To compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and microcurrent nerve stimulation (MENS) for the relief of masticatory muscle discomfort. Methods Groups I and II were further separated into two groups of 30 persons each (A and B), as well as subgroups C and D. Subjects in Group I received TENS treatment for 20 minutes at frequencies of 0-5 and 5-5 for subgroups A and B, and with visual analog scale (VAS) scores of 1-5 and 6-10 for subgroups C and D, respectively. Subjects in Group II received MENS for 20 minutes, with subgroups C and D receiving the same frequency and VAS score as subgroups A and B, respectively. All individuals underwent treatment with a comparable frequency and length of time every day for five days. Results For subgroup D treated with MENS, there was a considerable reduction in pain; however, for subgroups A and C, there was a comparable reduction in the VAS score for both groups treated with MENS and TENS therapy. Conclusion Compared to TENS, MENS provides quicker and more effective pain relief. Paresthesia and tingling are two adverse effects of TENS that are not present with MENS. However, MENS and TENS are equally helpful at treating masticatory muscle discomfort that is both acute and chronic, as well as improving mouth opening.

摘要

背景

一系列影响颌面部肌肉和/或颞下颌关节的疾病被称为颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)。近80%的普通人群受到TMDs的影响,其中48%的人张口困难且肌肉疼痛。目的:比较经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和微电流神经刺激疗法(MENS)缓解咀嚼肌不适的效果。方法:第一组和第二组又各自分为两组,每组30人(A组和B组),以及C亚组和D亚组。第一组的受试者接受TENS治疗20分钟,A亚组和B亚组的频率分别为0 - 5和5 - 5,C亚组和D亚组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)分别为1 - 5和6 - 10。第二组的受试者接受MENS治疗20分钟,C亚组和D亚组分别与A亚组和B亚组接受相同的频率和VAS评分。所有个体每天以相当的频率和时长接受治疗,持续五天。结果:接受MENS治疗的D亚组疼痛明显减轻;然而,对于A亚组和C亚组,接受MENS和TENS治疗的两组VAS评分均有类似程度的降低。结论:与TENS相比,MENS能更快、更有效地缓解疼痛。TENS有感觉异常和刺痛这两种不良反应,而MENS没有。然而,MENS和TENS在治疗急慢性咀嚼肌不适以及改善张口方面同样有效。