Herron Robert, Dhamija Ankit, Shumar Jenna, Kakuturu Jahnavi, Hayanga J W Awori, Lamb Jason, Toker Alper
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Sep 4;39(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae155.
There are little data within the literature regarding tracheobronchoplasty in the setting of the acute and chronically ill, morbidly obese or ventilator-dependent patients with tracheobronchomalacia. Short- and long-term outcomes are studied.
The series represents 12 tracheobronchomalacia patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores of 3-5. Candidacy was based on bronchoscopic findings during spontaneous respirations with >90% collapse of the trachea and both mainstem bronchi. We used dynamic computed tomography scan as an adjunct in those not mechanically ventilated. Our operative approach was a complete portal robotic approach for those outpatients (wheelchair dependent) and right thoracotomy for those who were already mechanically ventilated with 100% fraction of inspired oxygen with high pressure. Extracorporeal support was used in 2 patients.
Patients who underwent robotic repair were discharged without complications. Two patients who were critically ill and required extracorporeal support for their surgeries were separated from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on postoperative day 2. Three patients died at the follow-up. In 1 patient, the prolene mesh migrated into trachea and caused obstruction of the trachea and required removal with endobronchial techniques.
The repair of tracheobronchomalacia in patients with multiple comorbidities and with severe life-threatening problems in or outside the intensive care unit may have improvement due to the ability to wean from positive pressure ventilation. Surgical technique and the utilization of mesh support in tracheobronchoplasty operations may need to be debated due to duration of the surgery in patients with severe comorbidities.
关于在急性和慢性病、病态肥胖或依赖呼吸机的气管软化患者中进行气管支气管成形术的文献资料很少。研究了短期和长期结果。
该系列包括12例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况评分为3 - 5分的气管软化患者。入选标准基于自主呼吸时支气管镜检查结果,气管及双侧主支气管塌陷>90%。对于未机械通气的患者,我们使用动态计算机断层扫描作为辅助检查。对于门诊患者(依赖轮椅),我们采用完全经胸壁机器人手术入路;对于已经在100%高压吸氧下机械通气的患者,采用右开胸手术入路。2例患者使用了体外支持。
接受机器人修复的患者出院时无并发症。2例病情危重、手术需要体外支持的患者在术后第2天脱离体外膜肺氧合。3例患者在随访时死亡。1例患者,聚丙烯网片移入气管,导致气管阻塞,需要通过支气管内技术取出。
由于能够脱离正压通气,对于患有多种合并症且在重症监护病房内外存在严重危及生命问题的气管软化患者,气管支气管成形术的修复效果可能会有所改善。由于重症合并症患者手术时间长,气管支气管成形术中手术技术和网片支持的应用可能需要进一步探讨。