Balram Vibha, Ingleton Rhianna, Parsons Dave, George Stacey, Van Den Berg Maayken
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Department of Occupational Therapy, St. John of God Midland Public and Private Hospitals, Perth, WA, Australia.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2025 Mar;32(2):188-207. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2384325. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
Stroke survivors face high rates of depression, anxiety, and pseudobulbar affect. Clinicians report lack of clarity on effective non-pharmacological interventions due to uncertainty about treatment options as barriers to evidence-based treatment. No systematic review has investigated the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on the conditions of depression, anxiety, and pseudo-bulbar affect.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on the outcomes of depression, anxiety, and pseudobulbar affect in post-stroke individuals.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases Medline, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PsycINFO for randomized controlled trials in English, within 2012-2023, evaluating the effect of a non-pharmacological intervention on depression, anxiety, and/or pseudobulbar affect. Two researchers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. One researcher extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were synthesized narratively.
Forty-two studies were included. Intervention types included education ( = 9), psychological therapy ( = 8), and physical exercise ( = 8). Intervention types reporting positive outcomes for depression were psychological therapy ( = 6), physical exercise ( = 3) and robot-assisted therapy ( = 3). Intervention types effective in improving anxiety were physical exercise ( = 2), psychological therapy ( = 3) and multi-modal therapy approaches ( = 2). No studies explored the impact on pseudobulbar affect.
Non-pharmacological interventions may be effective in improving mood in stroke survivors. Robot-assisted therapy and physical exercise were seen to improve multiple outcome measures. Patient education should be delivered alongside rehabilitation and directed to both stroke-survivor and caregiver.
中风幸存者面临着较高的抑郁、焦虑和假性延髓情绪发生率。临床医生报告称,由于治疗选择的不确定性,缺乏关于有效非药物干预措施的明确指导,这成为循证治疗的障碍。尚无系统评价研究非药物干预对抑郁、焦虑和假性延髓情绪状况的有效性。
本研究旨在评估非药物干预对中风后个体抑郁、焦虑和假性延髓情绪结局的有效性。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们检索了Medline、Scopus、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引(CINAHL)和PsycINFO数据库,查找2012年至2023年期间以英文发表的随机对照试验,评估非药物干预对抑郁、焦虑和/或假性延髓情绪的影响。两名研究人员筛选标题、摘要和全文。一名研究人员提取数据并评估偏倚风险。对数据进行叙述性综合分析。
纳入42项研究。干预类型包括教育(9项)、心理治疗(8项)和体育锻炼(8项)。报告对抑郁有积极效果的干预类型有心理治疗(6项)、体育锻炼(3项)和机器人辅助治疗(3项)。对改善焦虑有效的干预类型有体育锻炼(2项)、心理治疗(3项)和多模式治疗方法(2项)。没有研究探讨对假性延髓情绪的影响。
非药物干预可能对改善中风幸存者的情绪有效。机器人辅助治疗和体育锻炼被认为能改善多种结局指标。患者教育应与康复同时进行,并针对中风幸存者及其照料者。