Department of Population Health, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
Department of Population Health, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio.
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Nov-Dec;34(6):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Adequate prenatal care is vital for positive maternal, fetal, and child health outcomes; however, differences in prenatal care utilization exist, particularly among rural populations. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth in prenatal care, but its impact on the adequacy of care remains unclear.
Using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data, this study examined prenatal care adequacy during the early-pandemic year (2020) and pre-pandemic years (2016-2019) and investigated rural-urban inequities. Logistic regression models assessed the association between the pandemic year and prenatal care adequacy, and considered barriers to virtual care as a covariate.
The sample consisted of 163,758 respondents in 2016-2019 and 42,314 respondents in 2020. Overall, the study participants were 12% less likely to receive adequate prenatal visits during the early-pandemic year (2020) compared with 2016-2019 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.86, 0.91]). Respondents in rural areas had lower odds of receiving adequate prenatal care compared with those in urban areas during both pre-pandemic years (aOR = 0.90; 95% CI [0.88, 0.93]) and the early-pandemic year (aOR = 0.94; 95% CI [0.88, 0.99]). However, after adjusting for barriers to virtual care, the difference between rural and urban areas in the early-pandemic year became nonsignificant (aOR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.78, 1.11]). Barriers to virtual care, including lack of phones, data, computers, internet access, and private space, were significantly associated with inadequate prenatal care.
During the early-pandemic year, PRAMS respondents experienced reduced adequacy of prenatal care. Although rural-urban inequities persisted, our results suggest that existing barriers to virtual care explained these inequities. Telehealth interventions that minimize these barriers could potentially enhance health care utilization among pregnant people.
充足的产前保健对于母婴和儿童健康结果具有重要意义;然而,产前保健的利用存在差异,尤其是在农村人口中。COVID-19 大流行加速了远程医疗在产前保健中的应用,但它对保健充足性的影响尚不清楚。
本研究使用妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)数据,考察了大流行早期年份(2020 年)和大流行前年份(2016-2019 年)的产前保健充足性,并调查了城乡不平等现象。逻辑回归模型评估了大流行年份与产前保健充足性之间的关联,并将虚拟护理障碍作为协变量进行考虑。
样本由 2016-2019 年的 163758 名受访者和 2020 年的 42314 名受访者组成。总体而言,与 2016-2019 年相比,大流行早期年份(2020 年)接受充分产前检查的研究参与者比例低 12%(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 0.88;95%置信区间[CI] [0.86, 0.91])。与城市地区相比,农村地区在大流行前年份(aOR = 0.90;95%CI [0.88, 0.93])和大流行早期年份(aOR = 0.94;95%CI [0.88, 0.99])获得充分产前保健的可能性均较低。然而,在调整虚拟护理障碍后,大流行早期年份城乡之间的差异不再具有统计学意义(aOR = 0.93;95%CI [0.78, 1.11])。虚拟护理障碍,包括缺乏电话、数据、电脑、互联网接入和私人空间,与产前保健不足显著相关。
在大流行早期年份,PRAMS 受访者的产前保健充足性有所下降。尽管城乡不平等现象仍然存在,但我们的研究结果表明,虚拟护理障碍解释了这些不平等现象。可以最大限度减少这些障碍的远程医疗干预措施可能会提高孕妇的医疗保健利用率。