Sigfridsson Jonathan, Baron Tomasz, Bergsten Johannes, Harms Hendrik J, Nordström Jonny, Kero Tanja, Svanström Patrik, Lindström Elin, Appel Lieuwe, Jonasson My, Lubberink Mark, Flachskampf Frank A, Sörensen Jens
Molecular Imaging and Medical Physics, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cardiology and Clinical Physiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
EJNMMI Res. 2024 Sep 18;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13550-024-01150-1.
Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) offers non-invasive assessment of perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function from a single dynamic scan. However, no prior assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by PET has been presented. Application of indicator dilution techniques and gated image analyses to PET data enables calculation of forward stroke volume and total LV stroke volume. We aimed to evaluate a combination of these methods for measurement of regurgitant volume (RegVol) and fraction (RegF) using dynamic O-water and C-acetate PET in comparison to cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
Twenty-one patients with severe primary mitral valve regurgitation underwent same-day dynamic PET examinations (O-water and C-acetate) and CMR. PET data were reconstructed into dynamic series with short time frames during the first pass, gated O-water blood pool images, and gated C-acetate myocardial uptake images. PET-based RegVol and RegF correlated strongly with CMR (RegVol: O-water r = 0.94, C-acetate r = 0.91 and RegF: O-water r = 0.88, C-acetate r = 0.84, p < 0.001). A systematic underestimation (bias) was found for PET (RegVol: O-water - 11 ± 13 mL, p = 0.002, C-acetate - 28 ± 16 mL, p < 0.001 and RegF: O-water - 4 ± 6%, p = 0.01, C-acetate - 10 ± 7%, p < 0.001). PET measurements in patients were compared to healthy volunteers (n = 18). Mean RegVol and RegF was significantly lower in healthy volunteers compared to patients for both tracers. The accuracy of diagnosing moderately elevated regurgitant volume (> 30mL) was 95% for O-water and 92% for C-acetate.
LV regurgitation severity quantified using cardiac PET correlated with CMR and showed high accuracy for discriminating patients from healthy volunteers.
心脏正电子发射断层扫描(PET)可通过单次动态扫描对灌注和左心室(LV)功能进行无创评估。然而,此前尚未有关于PET评估二尖瓣反流严重程度的报道。将指示剂稀释技术和门控图像分析应用于PET数据,能够计算出前向搏出量和左心室总搏出量。我们旨在评估这些方法的组合,通过动态氧-水和碳-醋酸盐PET测量反流容积(RegVol)和反流分数(RegF),并与心血管磁共振(CMR)进行比较。
21例重度原发性二尖瓣反流患者在同一天接受了动态PET检查(氧-水和碳-醋酸盐)及CMR检查。PET数据被重建为首次通过期间具有短时间帧的动态序列、门控氧-水血池图像和门控碳-醋酸盐心肌摄取图像。基于PET的RegVol和RegF与CMR具有强烈相关性(RegVol:氧-水r = 0.94,碳-醋酸盐r = 0.91;RegF:氧-水r = 0.88,碳-醋酸盐r = 0.84,p < 0.001)。发现PET存在系统性低估(偏差)(RegVol:氧-水 -11±13 mL,p = 0.002,碳-醋酸盐 -28±16 mL,p < 0.001;RegF:氧-水 -4±6%,p = 0.01,碳-醋酸盐 -10±7%,p < 0.001)。将患者的PET测量结果与健康志愿者(n = 18)进行比较。对于两种示踪剂,健康志愿者的平均RegVol和RegF均显著低于患者。诊断反流容积中度升高(> 30mL)时,氧-水的准确率为95%,碳-醋酸盐为92%。
使用心脏PET定量的左心室反流严重程度与CMR相关,并且在区分患者与健康志愿者方面具有较高的准确性。