Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Branch, Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Oct;10(5):e70002. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70002.
This study assessed the effect of the anodization of titanium abutments on the color parameters and color difference of lithium disilicate (LDS) all-ceramic crowns.
In this study, 19 straight abutments were divided into two groups: anodized (n = 9) and non-anodized control (n = 9), with one hybrid zirconia abutment as a reference. Anodization was achieved by applying 63 V energy using seven 9 V flat batteries in series, with an electrolyte solution comprising 1 g trisodium phosphate in 250 mL distilled water for 5 s, resulting in a gold-yellow color. Abutments were then scanned, and full-contour monolithic IPS e.max maxillary central incisor crowns were fabricated with 2 mm thickness and glazed. Reflectance was measured using a spectroradiometer, and color coordinates (L*, a*, b*, h*, and C*) were calculated using CS-10W software. Color differences of the crowns in both groups were quantified using the CIEDE2000 (ΔE) color difference formula and analyzed by t-test (α = 0.05) compared to the standard sample.
The L*, a*, b*, and c* parameters in anodized abutments were significantly higher than those in non-anodized abutments, while the h* parameter in anodized abutments was significantly lower than that in non-anodized abutments (p < 0.001 for all). There was a significant difference in ΔE of the two groups (p = 0.043).
Anodization of titanium abutments improved the color parameters of LDS all-ceramic crowns and significantly decreased their ΔE compared with non-anodized abutments.
本研究评估了钛基台阳极氧化对二硅酸锂(LDS)全瓷冠颜色参数和色差的影响。
本研究将 19 个直基台分为两组:阳极氧化组(n=9)和非阳极氧化对照组(n=9),并以一个混合氧化锆基台作为参照。阳极氧化采用 7 节 9V 扁电池串联施加 63V 能量,电解质溶液为 250ml 蒸馏水中含 1g 磷酸三钠,处理时间为 5s,处理后基台呈现金黄色。对基台进行扫描,采用 2mm 厚的 IPS e.max 全瓷压铸上颌中切牙冠进行全冠修复并上釉。采用分光光度计测量反射率,使用 CS-10W 软件计算颜色坐标(L*、a*、b*、h和 C)。采用 CIEDE2000(ΔE)色差公式对两组冠的色差进行量化,并通过 t 检验(α=0.05)与标准样本进行比较分析。
阳极氧化基台的 L*、a*、b和 c参数明显高于非阳极氧化基台,而阳极氧化基台的 h*参数明显低于非阳极氧化基台(p<0.001 )。两组间的 ΔE 有显著差异(p=0.043)。
与非阳极氧化基台相比,钛基台阳极氧化可改善 LDS 全瓷冠的颜色参数,并显著降低其 ΔE。