• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于综合征性颅缝早闭患儿CT扫描参考测定的4个正中矢状平面的三维形态计量分析

A 3-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of 4 Midsagittal Planes for CT Scan Reference Determination in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

作者信息

Zheng Lantian, Ramli Norlisah, Abdullah Norli Anida, Hariri Firdaus

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Sep 19:10556656241286309. doi: 10.1177/10556656241286309.

DOI:10.1177/10556656241286309
PMID:39295317
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the suitable and practical midsagittal plane (MSP) reference for computed tomography (CT) scan skull analysis in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 19 full skull CT scans of syndromic craniosynostosis patients.

METHODS

Seven craniofacial landmarks located on the midline and 4 MSPs that was previously published and clinically recognized (Planes: SPBaS, SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP) were constructed from the CT images. The absolute distance of every plane from 7 landmarks were then calculated. These distances were subsequently subjected to statistical analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The absolute distance of different MSPs from 7 landmarks.

RESULTS

The distances of landmarks measured to SPBaS were the highest, with the most prominent fluctuation. The fluctuation of the SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP had similar direction changes, with the latter being the closest. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated statistical differences (< .008 using the Bonferroni correction) between the measured distances of A point (M = 0.25, SD = 0.16) and B point (M = 2.21, SD = 1.6) to SPNSANS. There were statistical significances between distances of B point (M = 1.68, SD = 1.07) and CG point (M = 0.55, SD = 0.37) to SPZFTP plane. There was no statistical significance on each landmark to SPLOrPo.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that SPBaS is not recommended for MSP reference. While SPNSANS should be carefully selected, the application of SPLOrPo and SPZFTP are interchangeable, with the SPZFTP plane slightly exaggerating the mandible deviation relative to the superior and posterior of the midface.

摘要

目的

确定综合征性颅缝早闭患者计算机断层扫描(CT)颅骨分析中合适且实用的正中矢状面(MSP)参考标准。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

三级转诊医院。

患者和参与者

共19例综合征性颅缝早闭患者的全颅骨CT扫描。

方法

从CT图像构建位于中线的7个颅面标志点以及先前发表且临床认可的4个MSP(平面:SPBaS、SPNSANS、SPLOrPo和SPZFTP)。然后计算每个平面到7个标志点的绝对距离。随后对这些距离进行统计分析。

主要观察指标

不同MSP到7个标志点的绝对距离。

结果

测量到SPBaS的标志点距离最高,波动最显著。SPNSANS、SPLOrPo和SPZFTP的波动具有相似的方向变化,其中SPZFTP最接近。两两比较显示,A点(M = 0.25,SD = 0.16)和B点(M = 2.21,SD = 1.6)到SPNSANS的测量距离之间存在统计学差异(使用Bonferroni校正,P < 0.008)。B点(M = 1.68,SD = 1.07)和CG点(M = 0.55,SD = 0.37)到SPZFTP平面的距离之间存在统计学意义。每个标志点到SPLOrPo没有统计学意义。

结论

该研究表明不推荐将SPBaS作为MSP参考标准。虽然应谨慎选择SPNSANS,但SPLOrPo和SPZFTP的应用可互换,相对于面中部的上部和后部,SPZFTP平面会稍微夸大下颌骨偏差。

相似文献

1
A 3-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of 4 Midsagittal Planes for CT Scan Reference Determination in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.用于综合征性颅缝早闭患儿CT扫描参考测定的4个正中矢状平面的三维形态计量分析
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Sep 19:10556656241286309. doi: 10.1177/10556656241286309.
2
Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study.三维分析中两个正中矢状面的准确性及其在骨骼性下颌偏斜患者中的测量:一项比较研究。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;56(7):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
3
Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial CT evaluation.在三维面部CT评估中,根据建立参考平面的方法确定标志点的偏差。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Sep;44(3):207-12. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.207. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
4
Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.基于统计形状分析确定用于评估面部不对称的最佳正中矢状参考平面。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.01.017.
5
Preliminary Study to Determine the Reference Plane of Patients With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.确定单侧唇腭裂患者参考平面的初步研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Nov;54(6):707-714. doi: 10.1597/16-026. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.基于CBCT分析断层扫描的面部对称和不对称患者的基于地标点的正中矢状面分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Nov;79(6):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0151-3. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
Comparison of three midsagittal planes for three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation.用于三维锥形束计算机断层扫描头部重新定位的三个正中矢状面的比较
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):3-12. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.3. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.一种简单且准确的颅面矢状中平面定义。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Sep;152(3):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.025.
9
A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.颅面部不对称的形态计量学与传统头影测量正中矢状面的三维比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):285-94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0512-4. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
10
[Evaluation of three methods for constructing craniofacial mid-sagittal plane based on the cone beam computed tomography].[基于锥形束计算机断层扫描评估三种构建颅面正中矢状面的方法]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Apr 18;48(2):330-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Palatal symmetry analysis of surgical protocols for oral clefts by 3D stereophotogrammetry.通过三维立体摄影测量法对腭裂手术方案进行腭部对称性分析。
Odontology. 2025 Jul;113(3):1288-1295. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-01048-3. Epub 2025 Jan 3.