Zheng Lantian, Ramli Norlisah, Abdullah Norli Anida, Hariri Firdaus
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Sep 19:10556656241286309. doi: 10.1177/10556656241286309.
To identify the suitable and practical midsagittal plane (MSP) reference for computed tomography (CT) scan skull analysis in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Retrospective study.
Tertiary referral hospital.
A total of 19 full skull CT scans of syndromic craniosynostosis patients.
Seven craniofacial landmarks located on the midline and 4 MSPs that was previously published and clinically recognized (Planes: SPBaS, SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP) were constructed from the CT images. The absolute distance of every plane from 7 landmarks were then calculated. These distances were subsequently subjected to statistical analysis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The absolute distance of different MSPs from 7 landmarks.
The distances of landmarks measured to SPBaS were the highest, with the most prominent fluctuation. The fluctuation of the SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP had similar direction changes, with the latter being the closest. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated statistical differences (< .008 using the Bonferroni correction) between the measured distances of A point (M = 0.25, SD = 0.16) and B point (M = 2.21, SD = 1.6) to SPNSANS. There were statistical significances between distances of B point (M = 1.68, SD = 1.07) and CG point (M = 0.55, SD = 0.37) to SPZFTP plane. There was no statistical significance on each landmark to SPLOrPo.
The study demonstrates that SPBaS is not recommended for MSP reference. While SPNSANS should be carefully selected, the application of SPLOrPo and SPZFTP are interchangeable, with the SPZFTP plane slightly exaggerating the mandible deviation relative to the superior and posterior of the midface.
确定综合征性颅缝早闭患者计算机断层扫描(CT)颅骨分析中合适且实用的正中矢状面(MSP)参考标准。
回顾性研究。
三级转诊医院。
共19例综合征性颅缝早闭患者的全颅骨CT扫描。
从CT图像构建位于中线的7个颅面标志点以及先前发表且临床认可的4个MSP(平面:SPBaS、SPNSANS、SPLOrPo和SPZFTP)。然后计算每个平面到7个标志点的绝对距离。随后对这些距离进行统计分析。
不同MSP到7个标志点的绝对距离。
测量到SPBaS的标志点距离最高,波动最显著。SPNSANS、SPLOrPo和SPZFTP的波动具有相似的方向变化,其中SPZFTP最接近。两两比较显示,A点(M = 0.25,SD = 0.16)和B点(M = 2.21,SD = 1.6)到SPNSANS的测量距离之间存在统计学差异(使用Bonferroni校正,P < 0.008)。B点(M = 1.68,SD = 1.07)和CG点(M = 0.55,SD = 0.37)到SPZFTP平面的距离之间存在统计学意义。每个标志点到SPLOrPo没有统计学意义。
该研究表明不推荐将SPBaS作为MSP参考标准。虽然应谨慎选择SPNSANS,但SPLOrPo和SPZFTP的应用可互换,相对于面中部的上部和后部,SPZFTP平面会稍微夸大下颌骨偏差。