Zheng X, Wang L, Zhang B, Bai X, Qin Ke, Tian Y, Zhao R, Liu S, Wang J, Zhao Z
Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Orthodontic Department, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510140, Guangdong, China.
Orthodontic Department, Stomatological Hospital of Dandong, Dandong 118002, Liaoning, China.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;56(7):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of two midsagittal planes (MSP) to provide a better reference plane for studying the 3-dimensional structural symmetry in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation. Thirty adult patients with facial asymmetry were admitted to the Department of Orthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, between January 2015 and 2017. The DICOM data were collected and reconstructed using ProPlan CMF 2.0 (Materialise). Two sets of reference planes were set up. In the orbital margin plane group, the plane crossing the nasion (N) point and perpendicular to the frontozygomatic (FZ) suture line was used as the MSP. In the skull base plane group, the MSP was established using the sella turcica (S), N, and basion (Ba). The distances from the craniofacial skeletal and soft tissue midline landmarks to the two MSP were separately measured, and the significance of differences between measurements corresponding to two reference planes were assessed using the paired t test. Except for the posterior nasal spine (PNS)-MSP, the distances from other soft and hard tissue landmarks to the MSP in the orbital margin plane group were significantly shorter than those in the skull base plane group. In the 3-dimensional measurement analysis, the skeletal and soft tissue anatomical midline landmarks were closer to the MSP in the orbital margin plane group. The MSP crossing point N, perpendicular to the FZ suture line, was more accurate and suitable.
我们的目的是评估两个矢状中平面(MSP)的准确性,以便为研究下颌骨骨骼偏斜患者的三维结构对称性提供更好的参考平面。2015年1月至2017年期间,30名面部不对称的成年患者被收治于口腔医院正畸科。使用ProPlan CMF 2.0(Materialise)收集并重建DICOM数据。设置了两组参考平面。在眶缘平面组中,将穿过鼻根(N)点并垂直于额颧(FZ)缝线的平面用作MSP。在颅底平面组中,使用蝶鞍(S)、N和颅底点(Ba)建立MSP。分别测量颅面骨骼和软组织中线标志点到两个MSP的距离,并使用配对t检验评估对应于两个参考平面的测量值之间差异的显著性。除后鼻棘(PNS)-MSP外,眶缘平面组中其他软硬组织标志点到MSP的距离明显短于颅底平面组。在三维测量分析中,眶缘平面组中骨骼和软组织解剖学中线标志点更靠近MSP。穿过点N且垂直于FZ缝线的MSP更准确且合适。