Lao Jiahong, Jian Feitong, Ge Rongrong, Wu Shuo
E.N.T. Department, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Laryngoscope. 2025 Feb;135(2):529-539. doi: 10.1002/lary.31776. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
To evaluate the potential of tonsillotomy (TT) as an alternative to tonsillectomy (TE) for treating children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB).
Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and additional sources to identify controlled studies comparing TT versus TE in pediatric patients with oSDB.
We evaluated post-surgery symptom relief, and short- and long-term postoperative benefits for children. Fixed-effect meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted.
In our analysis of 32 studies with 9,430 children, the analysis revealed TT group had a similar therapeutic effect on improvement of OSA-18 as TE group (MD = 5.20, 95% CI: -32.67 to 43.07, p = 0.96). In terms of short-term outcome, the days to return to normal diet for TT group were shorter than that for TE group (MD = -2.49, 95%CI: -3.57 to -1.28; p < 0.001), less analgesics use (MD = -3.19, 95% CI = -3.44 to -2.93, p < 0.001), and lower postoperative secondary bleeding (RR = 0.33; 95%CI: 0.23 to 0.47; p < 0.001). But the risk of reoperation (OR = 8.28; 95%CI: 2.66 to 12.64; p < 0.001), oSDB recurrence (OR = 2.16; 95%CI: 1.20-3.86; p = 0.01), and postoperative infection (OR = 1.82; 95%CI: 1.34 to 2.47; p < 0.001) in TT group was significantly higher than that in TE group.
Tonsillotomy reduces postoperative pain and bleeding, speeding up recovery for children with oSDB, and improving their quality of life. Yet, the risk of recurrent infections from residual tonsil tissue, which may require reoperation, calls for a careful evaluation of the procedure's short-term gains against its long-term risks.
NA Laryngoscope, 135:529-539, 2025.
评估扁桃体切除术(TT)作为扁桃体摘除术(TE)的替代方法治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸障碍(oSDB)患儿的潜力。
两名独立评审员检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase及其他来源,以确定比较TT与TE治疗小儿oSDB的对照研究。
我们评估了术后症状缓解情况以及儿童术后的短期和长期获益。进行了固定效应荟萃分析、敏感性分析和亚组分析。
在我们对32项研究(共9430名儿童)的分析中,结果显示TT组在改善OSA-18方面与TE组具有相似的治疗效果(MD = 5.20,95%CI:-32.67至43.07,p = 0.96)。在短期结果方面,TT组恢复正常饮食的天数比TE组短(MD = -2.49,95%CI:-3.57至-1.28;p < 0.001),使用的镇痛药更少(MD = -3.19,95%CI = -3.44至-2.93,p < 0.001),术后继发性出血更低(RR = 0.33;95%CI:0.23至0.47;p < 0.001)。但TT组再次手术的风险(OR = 8.28;95%CI:2.66至12.64;p < 0.001)、oSDB复发风险(OR = 2.16;95%CI:1.20 - 3.86;p = 0.01)和术后感染风险(OR = 1.82;95%CI:1.34至2.47;p < 0.001)均显著高于TE组。
扁桃体切除术可减轻术后疼痛和出血,加快oSDB患儿的恢复并改善其生活质量。然而,残留扁桃体组织反复感染的风险(这可能需要再次手术)要求仔细权衡该手术的短期获益与其长期风险。
NA 《喉镜》,135:529 - 539,2025年