• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康护理领域职业治疗师对自然环境的利用特征:一项范围综述

Characteristics of natural environment use by occupational therapists working in mental health care: a scoping review.

作者信息

Bishop Ruth, Underwood Frazer, Fraser Fiona, Burrows Lisa, Shawe Jill

机构信息

Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK.

South West Clinical School in Cornwall, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Dec 1;22(12):2518-2558. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00437.

DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00437
PMID:39295463
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to identify and characterize the use of the natural environment/outdoor space by occupational therapists working in mental health care. This included consideration of the characteristics of the environment used, interventions, mental health conditions being treated, and the outcomes being considered.

INTRODUCTION

Research has demonstrated that there is a link between human health and the environment. The benefits appear to be particularly relevant to people with mental health conditions. Occupational therapists already consider the environment when assessing and developing interventions, and therefore are well placed to consider and use the natural environment in mental health practice. However, the use of the natural environment by occupational therapists working in mental health is unclear.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The scoping review included any publication relating to the use of the natural environment/outdoor space in mental health occupational therapy practice. All forms of the natural environment or outdoor space were included, such as hospital gardens and local parks. There were no geographical, gender, or age restrictions. All mental health diagnoses were eligible for inclusion.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched: Embase (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (ProQuest), AMED (Ovid), Trip Database, and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Gray literature was also searched using a selection of websites and digital repositories. Papers written in English were searched, with no time limit set on publication. Titles and abstracts were screened by 2 independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria, followed by a full-text review and data extraction. Data were extracted using the data extraction tool developed by the authors. Findings were presented in a tabular format, accompanied by a narrative summary describing how the results relate to the review objectives and question.

RESULTS

Of peer-reviewed publications, 7 papers used qualitative methods and 7 used mixed methodology. The remaining sources included conference abstracts, unpublished works, a book chapter, and a website article. The environments used included forests, beaches, gardens, and parks. A variety of interventions were delivered in these environments, including gardening and nature-based activities, physical activities, and animal-assisted interventions. Such activity-focused interventions are largely delivered in a group context, thus providing a social element. A diverse range of mental health conditions were treated. Several methods were used to consider the outcomes on the individual, including both qualitative measures and quantitative outcome measurement tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The review highlights many characteristics of how the natural environment is being used across mental health services by occupational therapists. A variety of conditions are targeted for such interventions, and several outcome measures have been used to understand impact. This review can support further development and implementation of nature-based approaches in mental health occupational therapy.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是识别和描述心理健康护理领域职业治疗师对自然环境/户外空间的使用情况。这包括对所使用环境的特征、干预措施、所治疗的心理健康状况以及所考虑的结果进行考量。

引言

研究表明,人类健康与环境之间存在联系。这些益处似乎对患有心理健康问题的人尤为相关。职业治疗师在评估和制定干预措施时已经会考虑环境因素,因此在心理健康实践中非常适合考虑并利用自然环境。然而,心理健康领域职业治疗师对自然环境的使用情况尚不清楚。

纳入标准

本范围综述纳入了任何与心理健康职业治疗实践中使用自然环境/户外空间相关的出版物。自然环境或户外空间的所有形式均包括在内,如医院花园和当地公园。没有地理、性别或年龄限制。所有心理健康诊断均符合纳入条件。

方法

检索了七个数据库:Embase(Ovid)、Emcare(Ovid)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、PsycINFO(ProQuest)、AMED(Ovid)、Trip数据库和CINAHL(EBSCOhost)。还使用了一些网站和数字资源库检索灰色文献。检索了用英文撰写的论文,对发表时间没有限制。由两名独立评审员筛选标题和摘要,以根据纳入标准进行评估,随后进行全文评审和数据提取。使用作者开发的数据提取工具提取数据。研究结果以表格形式呈现,并伴有叙述性总结,描述结果与综述目标和问题的相关性。

结果

在同行评审的出版物中,7篇论文使用了定性方法,7篇使用了混合方法。其余来源包括会议摘要、未发表的作品、一章书籍内容和一篇网站文章。所使用的环境包括森林、海滩、花园和公园。在这些环境中开展了各种干预措施,包括园艺和基于自然的活动、体育活动以及动物辅助干预。这种以活动为重点的干预措施大多在团体环境中进行,从而提供了社交元素。治疗了各种各样的心理健康状况。使用了多种方法来考量个体的结果,包括定性测量和定量结果测量工具。

结论

本综述突出了职业治疗师在心理健康服务中使用自然环境的许多特点。针对多种状况开展了此类干预措施,并使用了多种结果测量方法来了解其影响。本综述可为心理健康职业治疗中基于自然的方法的进一步发展和实施提供支持。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of natural environment use by occupational therapists working in mental health care: a scoping review.心理健康护理领域职业治疗师对自然环境的利用特征:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Dec 1;22(12):2518-2558. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00437.
2
Characteristics of natural environment use by occupational therapists working in mental health: a scoping review protocol.心理健康领域职业治疗师对自然环境的使用特点:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Apr 1;21(4):753-761. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00075.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review.初级保健中医师使用的基于价值的结果评估方法:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 Jan 1;23(1):108-142. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00183. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
6
Occupational therapy services provided to populations in non-urban areas: a scoping review protocol.面向非城市地区人群提供的职业治疗服务:范围综述研究方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Aug;19(8):1964-1970. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00242.
7
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
8
Non-familial intergenerational interventions and their impact on social and mental wellbeing of both younger and older people-A mapping review and evidence and gap map.非家庭代际干预及其对年轻人和老年人社会与心理健康的影响——一项映射综述以及证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 16;19(1):e1306. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1306. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Characteristics of Occupational Therapy Interventions for Community-Dwelling Adults With Anxiety: Protocol for a Scoping Review.针对社区居住的焦虑成年患者的职业治疗干预措施特点:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 1;12:e41230. doi: 10.2196/41230.
10
Preparing occupational therapy students for practice in rural areas: a scoping review protocol.准备职业治疗学生在农村地区实践:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 29;14(2):e075886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075886.