• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹壁前疝的临床研究及其治疗:一所医学院的经验

A Clinical Study of Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias and Its Management: A Medical College Experience.

作者信息

Ali Iqbal M, Shetty K Saurav, Shetty Varun

机构信息

General Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.

General Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67209. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67209. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.67209
PMID:39295727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410062/
Abstract

Objective We aim to evaluate the various risk factors contributing to the occurrence of anterior abdominal wall hernias and assess the various surgical modalities. Materials and methods This prospective observational research was conducted between 2022 and 2024 at a tertiary care health center, involving 100 participants with an anterior abdominal wall hernia diagnosis aged over 14 years. The study excluded patients under 14 years with bleeding diathesis, inherited coagulopathies, inguinal or femoral hernias, or recurrent ventral hernias. Participants underwent detailed clinical examinations and biochemical evaluations and underwent a primary ultrasonography (USG)/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to determine defect size. Risk factors were documented, including age, gender, occupation, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, previous surgery history, multiparity, smoking, chronic straining due to constipation or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), malnutrition, chronic steroid use, chronic renal failure, and chronic liver disease. The surgical procedure was determined by the same surgical team for all cases. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis and preoperative painting/draping protocols were followed in all cases. Intraoperatively, intraoperative time (in hours) was documented. Postoperative parameters included pain, hematoma formation, seroma formation, surgical site infections (SSIs), and early recurrence. These intra- and postoperative findings constituted the primary outcome parameters. Secondary outcome parameters included hospital stay duration and time taken to return to work. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) software. Results The study analyzed the occurrence of ventral hernias in 100 patients, with the fourth decade having the highest occurrence (n=42 (42%)). The majority of the participants were male (female: n=47 (47%), male: n=53 (53%)). The majority of the participants were laborers, and 24% (n=24) were office workers. The study found that hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were risk factors for hernias. Other risk factors included obesity, previous history of surgery, multiparity, smoking, chronic straining, malnutrition, and chronic steroid use. The most common type of ventral hernia was umbilical hernia (n=33 (33%)), followed by paraumbilical hernias (n=30 (30%)), and incisional hernias (n=20 (20%)). Of the 100 patients, 74% underwent open hernia repair, with the mean operation time being minimal in cases managed with laparoscopic repair (2.5±0.67 hours). Postoperative pain was highest with the Rives-Stoppa (RS) repair with component separation group. The incidence of surgical site infection was the maximum among cases of open anatomical repair (41.7%), followed by RS repair (31.3%), while it was the minimum in laparoscopic repair (3.7%). Early recurrence was lower in the laparoscopic group (n=1 (3.7%)). Conclusion The study highlights risk factors for abdominal wall hernia and management approaches. Understanding these is crucial for identifying and preventing recurrence. Surgeons must choose the right surgical approach based on patient health and symptoms to achieve desired outcomes and minimize complications. In addition, surgical expertise, availability of resources, and knowledge of what works best for the surgeon constitute important determinants of surgical outcomes.

摘要

目的 我们旨在评估导致前腹壁疝发生的各种风险因素,并评估各种手术方式。

材料与方法 这项前瞻性观察性研究于2022年至2024年在一家三级医疗保健中心进行,纳入了100名年龄超过14岁且被诊断为前腹壁疝的参与者。该研究排除了14岁以下有出血倾向、遗传性凝血障碍、腹股沟疝或股疝、或复发性腹疝的患者。参与者接受了详细的临床检查和生化评估,并接受了一次初步超声检查(USG)/增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)以确定缺损大小。记录了风险因素,包括年龄、性别、职业、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、既往手术史、多胎妊娠、吸烟、因便秘或良性前列腺增生(BPH)导致的慢性用力、营养不良、长期使用类固醇、慢性肾衰竭和慢性肝病。所有病例均由同一手术团队确定手术方式。所有病例均遵循标准的抗生素预防和术前涂药/铺巾方案。术中记录了手术时间(以小时为单位)。术后参数包括疼痛、血肿形成、血清肿形成、手术部位感染(SSI)和早期复发。这些术中及术后发现构成了主要结局参数。次要结局参数包括住院时间和恢复工作所需时间。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16版(IBM SPSS Statistics,纽约州阿蒙克)软件进行数据分析。

结果 该研究分析了100例患者腹疝的发生情况,其中第四年龄段的发生率最高(n = 42(42%))。大多数参与者为男性(女性:n = 47(47%),男性:n = 53(53%))。大多数参与者为体力劳动者,24%(n = 24)为上班族。该研究发现高血压、糖尿病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病是疝的风险因素。其他风险因素包括肥胖、既往手术史、多胎妊娠、吸烟、慢性用力排便、营养不良和长期使用类固醇。最常见的腹疝类型是脐疝(n = 33(33%)),其次是脐旁疝(n = 30(30%))和切口疝(n = 二十(二十%))。100例患者中,74%接受了开放疝修补术,腹腔镜修补术治疗的病例平均手术时间最短(2.5±0.67小时)。Rives-Stoppa(RS)修补术联合成分分离组术后疼痛最严重。开放解剖修补术病例的手术部位感染发生率最高(41.7%),其次是RS修补术(31.3%),而腹腔镜修补术的发生率最低(3.7%)。腹腔镜组的早期复发率较低(n = 1(3.7%))。

结论 该研究强调了腹壁疝的风险因素和管理方法。了解这些对于识别和预防复发至关重要。外科医生必须根据患者的健康状况和症状选择合适的手术方式,以实现预期效果并将并发症降至最低。此外,手术专业知识、资源可用性以及对最适合外科医生的方法的了解是手术结局的重要决定因素。

相似文献

1
A Clinical Study of Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias and Its Management: A Medical College Experience.腹壁前疝的临床研究及其治疗:一所医学院的经验
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67209. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67209. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Hughes abdominal closure versus standard mass closure to reduce incisional hernias following surgery for colorectal cancer: the HART RCT.Hughes 腹部关闭术与标准质量关闭术在减少结直肠癌手术后切口疝中的比较:HART RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(34):1-100. doi: 10.3310/CMWC8368.
4
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.原发性腹直肌旁疝的腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM Plus)与扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa修补术(eTEP-RS):一家三级医院50例病例的经验
Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57678. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Evaluation of Open Rives-Stoppa and Lichtenstein Repair Methods for Bilateral Inguinal Hernias: A Single-Centre Comparative Analysis.开放性Rives-Stoppa和Lichtenstein修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的评估:单中心对比分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):e67946. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67946. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
eTEP inferior access with tailored retromuscular dissection for small to mid-sized umbilical hernia repair with or without inguinal hernia: early experience.经脐下入路并采用个体化肌后间隙分离术治疗小型至中型脐疝(伴或不伴腹股沟疝):早期经验
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1491-1499. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02649-z. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
7
Medium-term follow-up confirms the safety and durability of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with PTFE.中期随访证实了使用聚四氟乙烯进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术的安全性和耐久性。
Surgery. 2003 Oct;134(4):599-603; discussion 603-4. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00283-6.
8
Effective Management of Giant Ventral Hernias: A Comprehensive Approach Combining Preoperative Botulinum Toxin Application, Modified Ramírez's Component Separation, and Rives-Stoppa Hernioplasty.巨大腹疝的有效管理:一种综合方法,结合术前肉毒杆菌毒素应用、改良拉米雷斯成分分离术和里夫斯-斯托帕疝修补术。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 17;15(11):e48967. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48967. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
e-TEP repair for midline primary and incisional hernia: technical considerations and initial experience.电子经皮内固定技术(e-TEP)修复中线原发性和切口疝:技术考虑和初步经验。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1635-1646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02397-6. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
10
A Prospective Observational Study of Ventral Hernia.一项关于腹疝的前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2022 Aug 21;14(8):e28240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28240. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and costs of retromuscular and intraperitoneal onlay mesh techniques in robotic incisional hernia repair.机器人切口疝修补术中后肌膜和腹腔内覆盖网技术的临床结果和成本。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2850-2856. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10776-0. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
A Prospective Observational Study of Ventral Hernia.一项关于腹疝的前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2022 Aug 21;14(8):e28240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28240. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Abdominal Wall Hernias: An Epidemiological Profile and Surgical Experience from a Rural Medical College in Central India.腹壁疝:印度中部一所农村医学院的流行病学概况及手术经验
Surg J (N Y). 2021 Mar 11;7(1):e41-e46. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722744. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Para-Umbilical Hernia- A Prospective Comparative Study of Short Term Outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术修复脐旁疝——短期疗效的前瞻性比较研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):PC22-PC24. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28905.10512. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
5
Designing a ventral hernia staging system.设计腹疝分期系统。
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):111-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1418-x. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
6
Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗切口疝和腹疝的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Sep;38(9):2233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2578-z.
7
Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗原发性腹外疝的结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Nov;148(11):1043-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3587.
8
Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.网片固定方法与腹腔镜腹侧或切口疝修补术后疼痛和生活质量:三种固定技术的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair for primary ventral hernias.腹腔镜修补术与开放修补术治疗原发性腹疝的比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Aug;19(4):341-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31819756d7.
10
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;88(5):1083-100, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.05.015.