Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Petroleum - Gas University, Ploiesti, Romania.
J Med Life. 2024 Jun;17(6):625-633. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0282.
This study aimed to evaluate the quality of dental restorations using laboratory microscopic techniques, focusing on the positioning of restorations relative to cavity edges and identifying common errors, such as incomplete or excessive coronal restorations. A total of 41 extracted lateral teeth, previously treated in vivo with Class I or II composites, were analyzed. Thirty-three of these teeth were sectioned medio-distally or buccal-orally and examined under a research laboratory microscope. Marginal areas were measured using eyepieces with a graduated scale and calibration slide, and a frequency statistical analysis was conducted. The analysis revealed that the teeth had fractious edges, deficient marginal closure, excess composite, incorrectly restored occlusal cusps, and marginal adaptation errors, with approximately half of these errors involving excess material. It was observed that restoration procedures in distal areas are particularly challenging, and clinical errors with excess material occur more frequently than those with a deficit. These findings underscore the need for improved techniques and precision in dental restorations to minimize such errors.
本研究旨在使用实验室显微镜技术评估牙体修复的质量,重点关注修复体相对于窝洞边缘的位置,并确定常见的错误,如修复体不完全或过度冠向。共分析了 41 颗离体的上颌第一或第二前磨牙,这些牙齿之前在体内用 I 类或 II 类复合材料进行过治疗。其中 33 颗牙齿被沿近远中或颊舌向切割,并在研究实验室显微镜下进行检查。使用带有刻度的目镜和校准载玻片测量边缘区域,并进行频率统计分析。分析表明,这些牙齿边缘有碎裂,边缘封闭不足,复合树脂过多,牙尖恢复不正确,边缘适应性误差,其中大约一半的错误涉及过多的材料。观察到在远中区域的修复程序特别具有挑战性,并且临床中出现的过度材料错误比不足材料错误更为常见。这些发现强调了需要改进技术和提高精确度来最小化这些错误。