Suppr超能文献

虚弱对全国队列中行经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术后结局及再入院的影响。

Impact of frailty on outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a national cohort.

作者信息

Miles Travis J, Ryan Christopher T, Hogan Katie J, Sayal Bhavesh S, Sylvester Christopher B, Rosengart Todd K, Coselli Joseph S, Moon Marc R, Ghanta Ravi K, Chatterjee Subhasis

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Tex.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2024 May 24;20:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.006. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effect of frailty on in-hospital mortality, readmission rates, and hospitalization costs after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in a population-level cohort.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement during 2016-2018. Multivariate logistic regression was used to discern independent effects of frailty on outcomes. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis was used to evaluate the effect of frailty on freedom from readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 243,619 patients underwent aortic valve replacement: 142,786 (58.6%) transcatheter aortic valve replacements and 100,833 (41.4%) surgical aortic valve replacements. Frail patients constituted 16,388 (11.5%) and 7251 (7.2%) in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement cohorts, respectively. Compared with nonfrail patients, frail patients had greater in-hospital mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 3.2% vs 1.1%; surgical aortic valve replacement: 6.1% vs 2.0%; both 001), longer length of stay (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: 4 vs 2 days; surgical aortic valve replacement: 13 vs 6 days; 001), and greater cost (transcatheter aortic valve replacement: $51,654 vs $44,401; surgical aortic valve replacement: $60,782 vs $40,544; 001). Time-to-event analysis showed that frail patients had higher rates of readmission over the calendar year in both transcatheter aortic valve replacement (001) and surgical aortic valve replacement (001) cohorts. This association persisted on adjusted multivariate regression for mortality (transcatheter aortic valve replacement odds ratio [95% CI] 1.98 [1.65-2.37], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.96 [1.60-2.41]), 30-day readmission (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.38 [1.27-1.49], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.47 [1.30-1.65]), and 90-day readmission (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.41 [1.31-1.52], surgical aortic valve replacement 1.60 [1.43-1.79]) (001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement, frailty is associated with in-hospital mortality, readmission, and higher costs. Further efforts to optimize outcomes for frail patients are warranted.

摘要

目的

我们在一个人群水平队列中研究了虚弱对经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院死亡率、再入院率和住院费用的影响。

方法

查询2016 - 2018年期间接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术患者的全国再入院数据库。采用多因素逻辑回归分析来识别虚弱对结局的独立影响。采用Kaplan - Meier事件发生时间分析来评估虚弱对无再入院的影响。

结果

共有243,619例患者接受了主动脉瓣置换术:142,786例(58.6%)接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术,100,833例(41.4%)接受外科主动脉瓣置换术。在经导管主动脉瓣置换术队列和外科主动脉瓣置换术队列中,虚弱患者分别占16,388例(11.5%)和7251例(7.2%)。与非虚弱患者相比,虚弱患者的住院死亡率更高(经导管主动脉瓣置换术:3.2%对1.1%;外科主动脉瓣置换术:6.1%对2.0%;P均<0.001),住院时间更长(经导管主动脉瓣置换术:4天对2天;外科主动脉瓣置换术:13天对6天;P<0.001),费用更高(经导管主动脉瓣置换术:51,654美元对44,401美元;外科主动脉瓣置换术:60,782美元对40,544美元;P<0.001)。事件发生时间分析表明,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(P<0.001)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(P<0.001)队列中,虚弱患者在整个日历年的再入院率更高。这种关联在调整后的多因素回归分析中对于死亡率(经导管主动脉瓣置换术比值比[95%置信区间]1.98[1.65 - 2.37],外科主动脉瓣置换术1.96[1.60 - 2.41])、30天再入院率(经导管主动脉瓣置换术1.38[1.27 - 1.49],外科主动脉瓣置换术1.47[1.30 - 1.65])和90天再入院率(经导管主动脉瓣置换术1.41[1.31 - 1.52],外科主动脉瓣置换术1.60[1.43 - 1.79])均持续存在(所有P<0.001)。

结论

对于接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者,虚弱与住院死亡率高、再入院率高及费用高相关。有必要进一步努力优化虚弱患者的治疗结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c19/11405972/724c5c4921b9/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验