Brunelli Alessandro, Lodhia Joshil, Milton Richard, Nardini Marco, Papagiannopoulos Kostas, Tcherveniakov Peter, Stefanou Demetrios, Teh Elaine, Chaudhuri Nilanjan
Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
JTCVS Open. 2024 May 20;20:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.002. eCollection 2024 Aug.
To evaluate the oncologic outcome of patients with hypermetabolic tumors resected by segmentectomy or lobectomy.
This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with peripheral clinical stage IA1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (January 2017-June 2023) who underwent resection by segmentectomy or lobectomy in a single center. A hypermetabolic tumor was defined as a tumor with a positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value >2.5. Propensity score case-matching analysis was used to generate 2 balanced groups of patients with hypermetabolic tumors operated by segmentectomy or lobectomy. Four-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cancer-specific survival were compared between the matched groups.
A total of 164 segmentectomies and 234 lobectomies were analyzed. There were 91 (55%) hypermetabolic tumors in the segmentectomy group versus 178 in the lobectomy group (76%), < .001. The comparison of the matched groups with hypermetabolic tumors showed a better 4-year OS after lobectomy compared with segmentectomy (lobectomy 87%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76-93; segmentectomy, 67%; 95% CI, 49-80; = .029). The 4-year EFS appeared to have a better trend after lobectomy (77%; 95% CI, 65-85) compared with segmentectomy (58%; 95% CI, 39-72), = .088. The 4-year cancer-specific survival, however, was similar between the matched groups (lobectomy, 95%; 95% CI, 86-98 vs segmentectomy, 94%; 95% CI, 78-99, = .79).
Early-stage peripheral hypermetabolic tumors are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes compared with less PET-avid tumors. Despite poorer OS and EFS after segmentectomy likely caused by cancer-unrelated deaths, cancer-specific survival in this high-risk group was similar after lobectomy or segmentectomy. In well-selected patients, a high PET maximum standardized uptake value should not be considered a contraindication to segmentectomy.
评估通过肺段切除术或肺叶切除术切除的高代谢肿瘤患者的肿瘤学结局。
这是一项对在单一中心接受肺段切除术或肺叶切除术的所有连续性外周临床I A1-2期非小细胞肺癌患者(2017年1月至2023年6月)的回顾性分析。高代谢肿瘤定义为正电子发射断层扫描(PET)最大标准化摄取值>2.5的肿瘤。采用倾向评分病例匹配分析来生成两组由肺段切除术或肺叶切除术治疗的高代谢肿瘤患者的平衡组。比较匹配组之间的4年总生存期(OS)、无事件生存期(EFS)和癌症特异性生存期。
共分析了164例肺段切除术和234例肺叶切除术。肺段切除术组有91例(55%)高代谢肿瘤,而肺叶切除术组有178例(76%),P<0.001。高代谢肿瘤匹配组的比较显示,与肺段切除术相比,肺叶切除术后4年OS更好(肺叶切除术87%;95%置信区间[CI],76-93;肺段切除术,67%;95%CI,49-80;P=0.029)。与肺段切除术(58%;95%CI,39-72)相比,肺叶切除术后4年EFS似乎有更好的趋势(77%;95%CI,65-85),P=0.088。然而,匹配组之间的4年癌症特异性生存期相似(肺叶切除术,95%;95%CI,86-98与肺段切除术,94%;95%CI,78-99,P=0.79)。
与PET摄取较低的肿瘤相比,早期外周高代谢肿瘤与较差的肿瘤学结局相关。尽管肺段切除术后OS和EFS较差可能是由与癌症无关的死亡导致,但在该高危组中,肺叶切除术或肺段切除术后癌症特异性生存期相似。在精心选择的患者中,PET最大标准化摄取值高不应被视为肺段切除术的禁忌证。