Miller Jason R, Yi Weijun, Adjeroh Donald A
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology; Hood College, Frederick, MD 21701, USA.
Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering; West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024 Sep 18;6(3):lqae125. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqae125. eCollection 2024 Sep.
The lncATLAS database quantifies the relative cytoplasmic versus nuclear abundance of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) observed in 15 human cell lines. The literature describes several machine learning models trained and evaluated on these and similar datasets. These reports showed moderate performance, . 72-74% accuracy, on test subsets of the data withheld from training. In all these reports, the datasets were filtered to include genes with extreme values while excluding genes with values in the middle range and the filters were applied prior to partitioning the data into training and testing subsets. Using several models and lncATLAS data, we show that this 'middle exclusion' protocol boosts performance metrics without boosting model performance on unfiltered test data. We show that various models achieve only about 60% accuracy when evaluated on unfiltered lncRNA data. We suggest that the problem of predicting lncRNA subcellular localization from nucleotide sequences is more challenging than currently perceived. We provide a basic model and evaluation procedure as a benchmark for future studies of this problem.
lncATLAS数据库对在15种人类细胞系中观察到的长链非编码RNA(lncRNA)的相对细胞质与细胞核丰度进行了量化。文献描述了在这些以及类似数据集上训练和评估的几种机器学习模型。这些报告显示,在 withheld from training的测试数据子集上,表现适中,准确率为72 - 74%。在所有这些报告中,数据集经过筛选,以纳入具有极端值的基因,同时排除具有中间范围值的基因,并且在将数据划分为训练和测试子集之前应用这些筛选条件。使用几种模型和lncATLAS数据,我们表明这种“中间排除”协议提高了性能指标,但在未过滤的测试数据上并未提高模型性能。我们表明,在未过滤的lncRNA数据上进行评估时,各种模型的准确率仅约为60%。我们认为,从核苷酸序列预测lncRNA亚细胞定位的问题比目前所认为的更具挑战性。我们提供了一个基本模型和评估程序,作为未来对此问题研究的基准。