Gyawali C Prakash, Marchetti Lorenzo, Rogers Benjamin D, Chan Walter W, Wong Ming-Wun, Visaggi Pierfrancesco, Rengarajan Arvind, Carlson Dustin A, Savarino Edoardo, de Bortoli Nicola, Chen Chien-Lin, Pandolfino John
Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 1;120(5):1009-1018. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003083. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
We explored if a score derived from parameters from esophageal testing could increase confidence in diagnosing conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease and in predicting outcome.
A prediction score was developed using metrics based on Lyon Consensus 2.0 thresholds extracted from endoscopy and pH-impedance monitoring. The Lyon score was the sum of weighted scores derived from a logistic regression model. The outcome was response to antireflux therapy, defined as 50% reduction in global symptoms on validated questionnaires. An existing database of endoscopy-negative patients with typical reflux symptoms undergoing esophageal testing from 2 centers (Europe and the United States) constituted the developmental cohort, while 2 separate cohorts (Europe and Asia) served as validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristics analysis determined performance of the Lyon score in predicting treatment response.
In 281 developmental cohort patients (median age 53 years, 57.7% female), the Lyon score demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.819 in predicting 50% symptom improvement ( P < 0.001) on receiver operating characteristics, with an optimal threshold of 6.25 (sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 73.4%). Of the individual components, only acid exposure time (AUC 0.799, P < 0.001), mean nocturnal baseline impedance (AUC 0.785, P < 0.001), and reflux episodes (AUC 0.764, P < 0.001) approached the Lyon score performance. The Lyon score segregated treatment response in both the European (AUC 0.908, P < 0.001) and Asian validation cohorts (AUC 0.637, P < 0.001) and outperformed the DeMeester score in sensitivity for predicting outcome in the developmental and Asian validation cohorts.
The novel Lyon score segregates reflux phenotypes and identifies likelihood of symptom response from antireflux therapy.
我们探讨了基于食管检测参数得出的评分是否能提高对确诊胃食管反流病的信心以及预测治疗结果。
使用基于从内镜检查和pH阻抗监测中提取的里昂共识2.0阈值的指标开发了一个预测评分。里昂评分是逻辑回归模型得出的加权分数之和。结果是抗反流治疗的反应,定义为经过验证的问卷上总体症状减轻50%。来自2个中心(欧洲和美国)的接受食管检测的内镜检查阴性且有典型反流症状的患者的现有数据库构成了开发队列,而另外2个独立队列(欧洲和亚洲)作为验证队列。受试者操作特征分析确定了里昂评分在预测治疗反应方面的性能。
在281名开发队列患者(中位年龄53岁,57.7%为女性)中,里昂评分在受试者操作特征分析中预测症状改善50%时的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.819(P<0.001),最佳阈值为6.25(敏感性81.2%,特异性73.4%)。在各个组成部分中,只有酸暴露时间(AUC 0.799,P<0.001)、夜间平均基线阻抗(AUC 0.785,P<0.001)和反流发作次数(AUC 0.764,P<0.001)接近里昂评分的性能。里昂评分在欧洲(AUC 0.908,P<0.001)和亚洲验证队列(AUC 0.637,P<0.001)中都能区分治疗反应,并且在开发队列和亚洲验证队列中预测结果的敏感性方面优于DeMeester评分。
新的里昂评分能区分反流表型并确定抗反流治疗症状反应的可能性。