Department of Clinical Microbiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Oct 16;62(10):e0040224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00402-24. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
Rapid detection is crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control. GeneXpert (Cepheid) is a widely used PCR system, known for its simplicity, random access, and point-of-care compatibility. SD BIOSENSOR recently introduced a similar system, STANDARD M10, including a (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid resistance (herein, MDR-TB) assay and an MTB/nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) assay. We evaluated these assays for the potential to replace the established Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in a low-TB incidence setting. We analyzed 160 clinical respiratory samples (45 MTB-positive and 35 NTM-positive) and further 24 drug-resistant MTB, 30 mycobacterial species (2 MTB, 28 NTM), and 37 non-mycobacterial isolates. Compared with culture, clinical sensitivities and specificities for MTB detection were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.1-95.6%) and 97.4% (CI = 92.3-99.4%) with Xpert Ultra, 88.9% (95% CI = 76.1-95.6%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MDR-TB, and 84.4% (CI = 70.9-94.4%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MTB/NTM, respectively. For NTM detection, M10 MTB/NTM showed sensitivity and specificity of 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) and 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%). Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), sensitivity and specificity for detecting RIF resistance were 100% (CI = 77.3-100%) and 95.6% (CI = 84.4-99.6%) with Xpert Ultra, and 100% (CI = 74.9-100%) and 95.5% (CI = 84.0-99.6%) with M10 MDR-TB. M10 MDR-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity (CI = 74.7-99.0%) and 100% specificity (CI = 87.3-100%) for detecting isoniazid resistance. All discrepancies in DST by PCR were concordant with whole-genome sequencing. While M10 MDR-TB demonstrated great potential as an alternative to Xpert Ultra, M10 MTB/NTM had limitations in NTM screening. Additionally, the M10 sputum pretreatment did not inactivate MTB efficiently, which should be considered in process risk assessment.
The molecular diagnostic STANDARD M10 system is highly analogous to the widely established GeneXpert system, which significantly increases the relevance of this evaluation study in the field of rapid detection of . To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evaluation describing the performance of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays, including an extensive analytical specificity panel (inclusivity and exclusivity) for the detection of , drug resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.
快速检测对于结核病(TB)控制至关重要。GeneXpert(Cepheid)是一种广泛使用的 PCR 系统,以其简单性、随机存取和即时护理兼容性而闻名。SD BIOSENSOR 最近推出了一种类似的系统,称为 STANDARD M10,包括 MTB 和 rifampicin(RIF)和异烟肼耐药(以下简称 MDR-TB)检测以及 MTB/非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)检测。我们评估了这些检测方法在低结核病发病率环境中替代现有 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测的潜力。我们分析了 160 例临床呼吸道样本(45 例 MTB 阳性和 35 例 NTM 阳性),进一步分析了 24 例耐药 MTB、30 种分枝杆菌物种(2 种 MTB、28 种 NTM)和 37 种非分枝杆菌分离株。与培养相比,Xpert Ultra 对 MTB 检测的临床敏感性和特异性分别为 88.9%(95%置信区间[CI] = 76.1-95.6%)和 97.4%(CI = 92.3-99.4%),M10 MDR-TB 分别为 88.9%(95%CI = 76.1-95.6%)和 98.3%(CI = 93.5-99.9%),M10 MTB/NTM 分别为 84.4%(CI = 70.9-94.4%)和 98.3%(CI = 93.5-99.9%)。对于 NTM 检测,M10 MTB/NTM 显示出 65.7%(CI = 49.1-79.2%)的敏感性和 96.8%(CI = 91.8-99.0%)的特异性。与表型药物敏感性试验(DST)相比,Xpert Ultra 检测 RIF 耐药的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%(CI = 77.3-100%)和 95.6%(CI = 84.4-99.6%),M10 MDR-TB 分别为 100%(CI = 74.9-100%)和 95.5%(CI = 84.0-99.6%)。M10 MDR-TB 对检测异烟肼耐药的敏感性为 92.3%(CI = 74.7-99.0%),特异性为 100%(CI = 87.3-100%)。PCR 检测与全基因组测序的所有差异均一致。虽然 M10 MDR-TB 作为 Xpert Ultra 的替代品具有巨大潜力,但 M10 MTB/NTM 在 NTM 筛查方面存在局限性。此外,M10 痰液预处理不能有效地使 MTB 失活,这在工艺风险评估中应予以考虑。
分子诊断 STANDARD M10 系统与广泛建立的 GeneXpert 系统高度相似,这极大地增加了本研究在快速检测领域的相关性。据我们所知,这是第一项描述 STANDARD M10 MDR-TB 和 MTB/NTM 检测性能的临床评估,包括对 的检测、耐药性和非结核分枝杆菌的广泛分析特异性面板(包容性和排他性)。