Pain Interference Prior to and 1 Year After Surgery for Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury.

PURPOSE

Pain after brachial plexus injury (BPI) can be severely debilitating and is poorly understood. We hypothesized that pain interference (PI) ("the extent to which pain hinders engagement in life") would be predicted by depression, anxiety, severity of pain symptoms, and poorer preoperative muscle function.

METHODS

Among patients in a prospective multicenter BPI cohort study, 37 completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PI questionnaires before and 1 year after surgery. At both times, participants completed anxiety and depression questionnaires and BPI-specific measures of pain symptoms, physical limitations, and emotional recovery. Surgeon-graded muscle testing, injury severity, age at the time of injury, body mass index, and time from injury to surgery were included. We performed a bivariate analysis of predictors for preoperative and 1-year PROMIS PI followed by multivariable regression modeling using stepwise selection and Bayesian Information Criterion to select covariates.

RESULTS

Before surgery, the mean PROMIS PI score was 60.8 ± 11.0, with moderate correlations between PROMIS PI and depression, as well as between PROMIS PI and functional limitations. At 1 year after surgery, the mean PROMIS PI score was 59.7 ± 9.5. There was no difference in preoperative and 1-year PROMIS PI. There were strong correlations between PROMIS PI and pain symptoms, functional limitations, and emotional aspects of recovery at the 1-year follow-up that remained significant in multivariable regression. There were no notable associations between muscle testing and PI.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain interference remained substantial and elevated in BPI patients 1 year after surgery. We noted strong associations between PI and pain symptoms, functional limitations, and emotional aspects of recovery. These findings demonstrate the persistence of pain as a feature throughout life after BPI and that its treatment should be considered a priority alongside efforts to improve extremity function.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis IV.