Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae096.
Diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome is challenging and associated with high perihospital mortality rates. The study aim was to evaluate current pathways and understand the chronology of acute aortic syndrome patient care.
Consecutive patients with acute aortic syndrome imaging diagnosis between 1 January 2018 and 1 June 2021 were identified using a predetermined search strategy and followed up for 6 months through retrospective case note review. The UK National Interventional Radiology Trainee Research and Vascular and Endovascular Research Network co-ordinated the study.
From 15 UK sites, 620 patients were enrolled. The median age was 67 (range 25-98) years, 62.0% were male and 92.9% Caucasian. Type-A dissection (41.8%) was most common, followed by type-B (34.5%); 41.2% had complicated acute aortic syndrome. Mode of presentation included emergency ambulance (80.2%), self-presentation (16.2%), and primary care referral (3.6%). Time (median (i.q.r.)) to hospital presentation was 3.1 (1.8-8.6) h and decreased by sudden onset chest pain but increased with migratory pain or hypertension. Time from hospital presentation to imaging diagnosis was 3.2 (1.3-6.5) h and increased by family history of aortic disease and decreased by concurrent ischaemic limb. Time from diagnosis to treatment was 2 (1.0-4.3) h with interhospital transfer causing delay. Management included conservative (60.2%), open surgery (32.2%), endovascular (4.8%), hybrid (1.4%) and palliative (1.4%). Factors associated with a higher mortality rate at 30 days and 6 months were acute aortic syndrome type, complicated disease, no critical care admission and age more than 70 years (P < 0.05).
This study presents a longitudinal data set linking time-based delays to diagnosis and treatment with clinical outcomes. It can be used to prioritize research strategies to streamline patient care.
急性主动脉综合征的诊断具有挑战性,且与围手术期高死亡率相关。本研究旨在评估当前的诊疗路径,并了解急性主动脉综合征患者诊疗的时间顺序。
使用预定的搜索策略,确定了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 1 日期间进行急性主动脉综合征影像学诊断的连续患者,并通过回顾性病历审查进行了 6 个月的随访。英国国家介入放射学学员研究和血管及血管内研究网络协调了这项研究。
从 15 个英国站点共纳入 620 名患者。患者中位年龄为 67(25-98)岁,62.0%为男性,92.9%为白种人。A型夹层(41.8%)最常见,其次是 B 型(34.5%);41.2%的患者为复杂的急性主动脉综合征。发病模式包括急救车(80.2%)、自行就诊(16.2%)和初级保健转诊(3.6%)。从发病到就诊的中位时间(IQR)为 3.1(1.8-8.6)h,突发胸痛者时间更短,但迁移性疼痛或高血压者时间更长。从就诊到影像学诊断的中位时间为 3.2(1.3-6.5)h,有主动脉疾病家族史者时间更长,合并缺血性肢体疾病者时间更短。从诊断到治疗的中位时间为 2(1.0-4.3)h,院内转院会导致延迟。治疗方法包括保守治疗(60.2%)、开放手术(32.2%)、血管内治疗(4.8%)、杂交治疗(1.4%)和姑息治疗(1.4%)。30 天和 6 个月时死亡率较高的相关因素包括急性主动脉综合征类型、复杂疾病、未入住重症监护病房和年龄大于 70 岁(P < 0.05)。
本研究提供了一个从诊断到治疗再到临床结局的基于时间的延迟的纵向数据集,可用于确定优先研究策略,以简化患者的诊疗流程。